#METABOLOMICS WORKBENCH dagaul_20210722_122433 DATATRACK_ID:2765 STUDY_ID:ST001885 ANALYSIS_ID:AN003049 PROJECT_ID:000000
VERSION             	1
CREATED_ON             	July 22, 2021, 1:20 pm
#PROJECT
PR:PROJECT_TITLE                 	Differentiating toxic and nontoxic cogeneric harmful algae using the non-polar
PR:PROJECT_TITLE                 	metabolome.
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	Recognition and rejection of chemically defended prey is critical to maximizing
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	fitness for predators. Paralytic shellfish toxins (PSTs) which strongly inhibit
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	voltage-gated sodium channels in diverse animal taxa are produced by several
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	species of the bloom-forming algal genus Alexandrium where they appear to
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	function as chemical defenses against grazing copepods. Despite PSTs being
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	produced and localized within phytoplankton cells, some copepods distinguish
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	toxic from non-toxic prey, selectively ingesting less toxic cells, in ways that
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	suggest cell surface recognition perhaps associated with non-polar metabolites.
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	In this study LC/MS and NMR-based metabolomics revealed that the non-polar
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	metabolomes of two toxic species (Alexandrium catenella and Alexandrium
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	pacificum) vary considerably from their non-toxic congener Alexandrium tamarense
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	despite all three being very closely related. Toxic and non-toxic Alexandrium
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	spp. were distinguished from each other by metabolites belonging to seven lipid
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	classes. Of these, 17 specific metabolites were significantly more abundant in
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	both toxic A. catenella and A. pacificum compared to non-toxic A. tamarense
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	suggesting that just a small portion of the observed metabolic variability is
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	associated with toxicity. Future experiments aimed at deciphering chemoreception
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	mechanisms of copepod perception of Alexandrium toxicity should consider these
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	metabolites, and the broader lipid classes phosphatidylcholines and sterols, as
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	potential candidate cues.
PR:INSTITUTE                     	Georgia Institute of Technology
PR:LAST_NAME                     	Brown
PR:FIRST_NAME                    	Emily
PR:ADDRESS                       	950 Atlantic Dr Atlanta GA 30332, USA
PR:EMAIL                         	julia.kubanek@biosci.gatech.edu
PR:PHONE                         	404-894-8424
#STUDY
ST:STUDY_TITLE                   	MS Differentiating toxic and nontoxic cogeneric harmful algae using the
ST:STUDY_TITLE                   	non-polar metabolome.
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	Recognition and rejection of chemically defended prey is critical to maximizing
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	fitness for predators. Paralytic shellfish toxins (PSTs) which strongly inhibit
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	voltage-gated sodium channels in diverse animal taxa are produced by several
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	species of the bloom-forming algal genus Alexandrium where they appear to
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	function as chemical defenses against grazing copepods. Despite PSTs being
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	produced and localized within phytoplankton cells, some copepods distinguish
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	toxic from non-toxic prey, selectively ingesting less toxic cells, in ways that
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	suggest cell surface recognition perhaps associated with non-polar metabolites.
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	In this study LC/MS and NMR-based metabolomics revealed that the non-polar
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	metabolomes of two toxic species (Alexandrium catenella and Alexandrium
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	pacificum) vary considerably from their non-toxic congener Alexandrium tamarense
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	despite all three being very closely related. Toxic and non-toxic Alexandrium
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	spp. were distinguished from each other by metabolites belonging to seven lipid
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	classes. Of these, 17 specific metabolites were significantly more abundant in
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	both toxic A. catenella and A. pacificum compared to non-toxic A. tamarense
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	suggesting that just a small portion of the observed metabolic variability is
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	associated with toxicity. Future experiments aimed at deciphering chemoreception
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	mechanisms of copepod perception of Alexandrium toxicity should consider these
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	metabolites, and the broader lipid classes phosphatidylcholines and sterols, as
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	potential candidate cues.
ST:INSTITUTE                     	Georgia Institute of Technology
ST:LAST_NAME                     	Brown
ST:FIRST_NAME                    	Emily
ST:ADDRESS                       	950 Atlantic Dr Atlanta GA 30332, USA
ST:EMAIL                         	julia.kubanek@biosci.gatech.edu
ST:PHONE                         	404-894-8424
#SUBJECT
SU:SUBJECT_TYPE                  	Other organism
SU:SUBJECT_SPECIES               	Alexandrium catenella; Alexandrium tamarense; Alexandrium pacificum
SU:SPECIES_GROUP                 	Not Human -- Alexandrium catenella; Alexandrium tamarense; Alexandrium pacificum
#SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS:         	SUBJECT(optional)[tab]SAMPLE[tab]FACTORS(NAME:VALUE pairs separated by |)[tab]Raw file names and additional sample data
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	74_3ERB74_AC_1	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_catenella	RAW_FILE_NAME=74_3ERB74_AC_1
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	74_3ERB74_AC_2	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_catenella	RAW_FILE_NAME=74_3ERB74_AC_2
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	74_3ERB74_AC_3	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_catenella	RAW_FILE_NAME=74_3ERB74_AC_3
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	74_3ERB74_AC_4	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_catenella	RAW_FILE_NAME=74_3ERB74_AC_4
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	74_3ERB74_AC_5	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_catenella	RAW_FILE_NAME=74_3ERB74_AC_5
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	74_3ERB74_AC_6	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_catenella	RAW_FILE_NAME=74_3ERB74_AC_6
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	74_3ERB74_AC_7	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_catenella	RAW_FILE_NAME=74_3ERB74_AC_7
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	74_3ERB74_AC_8	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_catenella	RAW_FILE_NAME=74_3ERB74_AC_8
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	74_3ERB74_AC_9	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_catenella	RAW_FILE_NAME=74_3ERB74_AC_9
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	74_3ERB74_AC_10	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_catenella	RAW_FILE_NAME=74_3ERB74_AC_10
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	74_3ERB74_AC_11	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_catenella	RAW_FILE_NAME=74_3ERB74_AC_11
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	74_3ERB74_AC_12	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_catenella	RAW_FILE_NAME=74_3ERB74_AC_12
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	74_3ERB74_AC_13	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_catenella	RAW_FILE_NAME=74_3ERB74_AC_13
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	74_3ERB74_AC_14	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_catenella	RAW_FILE_NAME=74_3ERB74_AC_14
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	74_3ERB74_AC_15	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_catenella	RAW_FILE_NAME=74_3ERB74_AC_15
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	74_3ERB74_AT_1	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_tamarense	RAW_FILE_NAME=74_3ERB74_AT_1
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	74_3ERB74_AT_2	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_tamarense	RAW_FILE_NAME=74_3ERB74_AT_2
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	74_3ERB74_AT_3	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_tamarense	RAW_FILE_NAME=74_3ERB74_AT_3
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	74_3ERB74_AT_4	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_tamarense	RAW_FILE_NAME=74_3ERB74_AT_4
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	74_3ERB74_AT_5	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_tamarense	RAW_FILE_NAME=74_3ERB74_AT_5
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	74_3ERB74_AT_6	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_tamarense	RAW_FILE_NAME=74_3ERB74_AT_6
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	74_3ERB74_AT_7	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_tamarense	RAW_FILE_NAME=74_3ERB74_AT_7
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	74_3ERB74_AT_8	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_tamarense	RAW_FILE_NAME=74_3ERB74_AT_8
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	74_3ERB74_AT_9	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_tamarense	RAW_FILE_NAME=74_3ERB74_AT_9
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	74_3ERB74_AT_10	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_tamarense	RAW_FILE_NAME=74_3ERB74_AT_10
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	74_3ERB74_AT_11	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_tamarense	RAW_FILE_NAME=74_3ERB74_AT_11
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	74_3ERB74_AT_12	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_tamarense	RAW_FILE_NAME=74_3ERB74_AT_12
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	74_3ERB74_AT_13	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_tamarense	RAW_FILE_NAME=74_3ERB74_AT_13
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	74_3ERB74_AT_14	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_tamarense	RAW_FILE_NAME=74_3ERB74_AT_14
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	74_3ERB74_AT_15	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_tamarense	RAW_FILE_NAME=74_3ERB74_AT_15
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	75_3ERB75_AP_1	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_pacificum	RAW_FILE_NAME=75_3ERB75_AP_1
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	75_3ERB75_AP_2	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_pacificum	RAW_FILE_NAME=75_3ERB75_AP_2
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	75_3ERB75_AP_3	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_pacificum	RAW_FILE_NAME=75_3ERB75_AP_3
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	75_3ERB75_AP_4	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_pacificum	RAW_FILE_NAME=75_3ERB75_AP_4
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	75_3ERB75_AP_5	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_pacificum	RAW_FILE_NAME=75_3ERB75_AP_5
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	75_3ERB75_AP_6	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_pacificum	RAW_FILE_NAME=75_3ERB75_AP_6
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	75_3ERB75_AP_7	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_pacificum	RAW_FILE_NAME=75_3ERB75_AP_7
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	75_3ERB75_AP_9	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_pacificum	RAW_FILE_NAME=75_3ERB75_AP_9
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	75_3ERB75_AP_10	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_pacificum	RAW_FILE_NAME=75_3ERB75_AP_10
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	75_3ERB75_AP_11	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_pacificum	RAW_FILE_NAME=75_3ERB75_AP_11
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	75_3ERB75_AP_13	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_pacificum	RAW_FILE_NAME=75_3ERB75_AP_13
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	75_3ERB75_AP_14	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_pacificum	RAW_FILE_NAME=75_3ERB75_AP_14
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	75_3ERB75_AP_15	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_pacificum	RAW_FILE_NAME=75_3ERB75_AP_15
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	75_3ERB75_AT_1	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_tamarense2	RAW_FILE_NAME=75_3ERB75_AT_1
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	75_3ERB75_AT_2	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_tamarense2	RAW_FILE_NAME=75_3ERB75_AT_2
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	75_3ERB75_AT_3	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_tamarense2	RAW_FILE_NAME=75_3ERB75_AT_3
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	75_3ERB75_AT_4	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_tamarense2	RAW_FILE_NAME=75_3ERB75_AT_4.
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	75_3ERB75_AT_5	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_tamarense2	RAW_FILE_NAME=75_3ERB75_AT_5
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	75_3ERB75_AT_6	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_tamarense2	RAW_FILE_NAME=75_3ERB75_AT_6
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	75_3ERB75_AT_7	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_tamarense2	RAW_FILE_NAME=75_3ERB75_AT_7
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	75_3ERB75_AT_8	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_tamarense2	RAW_FILE_NAME=75_3ERB75_AT_8
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	75_3ERB75_AT_9	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_tamarense2	RAW_FILE_NAME=75_3ERB75_AT_9
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	75_3ERB75_AT_10	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_tamarense2	RAW_FILE_NAME=75_3ERB75_AT_10
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	75_3ERB75_AT_11	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_tamarense2	RAW_FILE_NAME=75_3ERB75_AT_11
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	75_3ERB75_AT_12	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_tamarense2	RAW_FILE_NAME=75_3ERB75_AT_12
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	75_3ERB75_AT_13	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_tamarense2	RAW_FILE_NAME=75_3ERB75_AT_13
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	75_3ERB75_AT_14	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_tamarense2	RAW_FILE_NAME=75_3ERB75_AT_14
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	75_3ERB75_AT_15	factor:Treatment;Alexandrium_tamarense2	RAW_FILE_NAME=75_3ERB75_AT_15
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	Blank01	factor:QC	RAW_FILE_NAME=Blank01
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	Blank02	factor:QC	RAW_FILE_NAME=Blank02
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	QC01	factor:QC	RAW_FILE_NAME=QC01
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	QC02	factor:QC	RAW_FILE_NAME=QC02
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	QC03	factor:QC	RAW_FILE_NAME=QC03
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	QC04	factor:QC	RAW_FILE_NAME=QC04
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	QC05	factor:QC	RAW_FILE_NAME=QC05
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	QC06	factor:QC	RAW_FILE_NAME=QC06
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	QC07	factor:QC	RAW_FILE_NAME=QC07
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	QC08	factor:QC	RAW_FILE_NAME=QC08
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	QC09	factor:QC	RAW_FILE_NAME=QC09
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	QC10	factor:QC	RAW_FILE_NAME=QC10
#COLLECTION
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	Alexandrium cells were collected by vacuum filtration onto GF/F filters and
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	quenched with liquid nitrogen. Frozen cells with filters were stored in
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	foil(previously muffled for 3 h at 450 °C) at -80 °C until extraction.
CO:SAMPLE_TYPE                   	Algae
#TREATMENT
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	Metabolomes of toxic versus non-toxic species were compared using the following
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	experimental pairings: A. tamarense (n=15) with A. catenella (n=15) (Experiment
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	1) and A. tamarense (n=15) with A. pacificum (n=15) (Experiment 2). The same
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	non-toxic strain of A. tamarense was used in both experiments but the two
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	experiments were conducted separately, in different months, to make the
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	experiment manageable based on availability of batches grown from stock
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	cultures. For both experiments, Alexandrium spp. cultures at a cell density of
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	12,000 to 13,000 cells mL-1 were split into fifteen 300 mL subcultures of each
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	species which grew for two days. At the end of each experiment, during
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	harvesting, a 1.0 mL aliquot from each culture was preserved with Lugol’s
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	solution to measure cell concentrations
#SAMPLEPREP
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	IPA: ACN (2:1) extract 4.54e6 cells per 1mL
#CHROMATOGRAPHY
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_TYPE           	Reversed phase
CH:INSTRUMENT_NAME               	Thermo Vanquish
CH:COLUMN_NAME                   	Thermo Accucore C30 (150 x 2.1 mm, 2.6um)
#ANALYSIS
AN:ANALYSIS_TYPE                 	MS
#MS
MS:INSTRUMENT_NAME               	Thermo Orbitrap ID-X tribrid
MS:INSTRUMENT_TYPE               	orbitrap and ion trap
MS:MS_TYPE                       	ESI
MS:ION_MODE                      	POSITIVE
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	compound discoverer
MS:MS_RESULTS_FILE               	ST001885_AN003049_Results.txt	UNITS:peak area	Has m/z:Neutral masses	Has RT:Yes	RT units:Minutes
#END