Data for Physiological and metabolic response of crab megalopae and juveniles to ocean acidification (part-III) (Study ST001165)

(Analysis AN001927)

Values for each metabolite have been scaled by dividing by the mean across all factors

Run Hierarchial cluster analysis on this study | Run Heatmap cluster analysis on this study

MetaboliteF1F2F3F4
1_Ceramide (d18:1/17:0) iSTD 1.0223 0.9986 0.9944 0.9847
1_CUDA iSTD 0.9900 1.0270 0.9922 0.9908
1_FA (16:0)-d3 iSTD 1.0193 1.0282 0.9652 0.9874
1_LPC (17:0) iSTD 1.0263 0.9972 0.9984 0.9781
1_LPE (17:1) iSTD 1.0158 1.0065 0.9871 0.9905
1_MAG (17:0/0:0/0:0) iSTD 1.0225 1.0095 0.9848 0.9833
1_PC (12:0/13:0) iSTD 1.0035 1.0145 0.9967 0.9853
1_PE (17:0/17:0) iSTD 1.0354 0.9955 0.9742 0.9948
1_PG (17:0/17:0) iSTD 1.0293 1.0024 0.9749 0.9934
1_SM (d18:1/17:0) iSTD 1.0511 0.9944 0.9983 0.9561
Ceramide (d34:1) 1.0127 0.9449 0.9869 1.0555
FA (15:0) (pentadecylicacid) 0.9933 1.1285 0.9089 0.9693
FA (16:1) (palmitoleicacid) 0.9552 1.1234 1.0211 0.9002
FA (17:0) (margaricacid) 1.0634 1.0719 0.9273 0.9374
FA (17:1) (heptadecenoicacid) 0.8869 1.0126 1.1397 0.9608
FA (18:0) (stearicacid) 1.1595 1.0761 0.8604 0.9039
FA (18:1) (oleicacid) 1.0907 1.0302 0.8338 1.0453
FA (18:2) (linoleicacid) 0.9752 1.0040 0.9375 1.0833
FA (18:3) (linolenicacid) 0.9001 1.0381 1.0856 0.9762
FA (20:0) (arachidicacid) 0.6098 2.3634 0.4983 0.5285
FA (20:1) (eicosenoicacid) 1.0431 1.0752 1.0550 0.8268
FA (20:2) (eicosadienoicacid) 0.9719 1.0314 1.0562 0.9404
FA (20:3) (eicosatrienoicacid) 0.9711 1.0739 1.0025 0.9525
FA (20:3) (homo-gamma-linolenicacid) 0.9274 1.1322 1.0259 0.9145
FA (20:4) (arachidonicacid) 1.0546 1.0025 1.0087 0.9341
FA (20:5) (eicosapentaenoicacid) 0.9164 1.0844 0.9735 1.0258
FA (22:0) (behenicacid) 0.4280 2.7447 0.3781 0.4492
FA (22:2) (docosadienoicacid) 0.9614 1.0686 1.0933 0.8766
FA (22:6) (docosahexaenoicacid) 1.0046 1.1847 1.0475 0.7631
GlcCer(d14:1(4E)/20:0(2OH)) 0.7971 1.0622 0.8779 1.2628
LPC (16:0) 0.8465 0.9553 0.9440 1.2543
LPC (20:3) 0.8990 0.9878 0.9673 1.1459
LPE (16:0) 0.8644 0.9167 0.9378 1.2811
LPE (20:4) 0.9861 0.9783 0.9933 1.0423
PC (32:0) 0.9183 0.9600 0.9335 1.1882
PC (32:1) 0.8683 1.0222 0.8711 1.2383
PC (32:2) 0.8363 1.0384 0.9747 1.1505
PC (34:1) 1.3996 0.8776 0.7130 1.0097
PC (34:2) 0.9019 1.0397 0.9059 1.1525
PC (34:3) 0.8020 1.0720 0.9012 1.2249
PC (34:4) 0.7268 1.0767 0.8823 1.3143
PC (36:4) A 0.7527 1.0869 0.8918 1.2686
PC (36:4) B 0.8104 1.0630 0.9279 1.1986
PC (36:5) A 0.8101 1.0754 0.8857 1.2288
PC (36:5) B 0.7603 1.0577 0.8770 1.3050
PC (38:5) A 0.8183 0.9775 0.9668 1.2374
PC (38:5) B 0.8922 1.0268 0.9453 1.1357
PC (38:6) 0.7560 1.0234 0.8700 1.3505
PC (40:7) 0.8781 1.0128 0.8783 1.2309
PC (o-32:0) 1.0592 0.8655 1.0328 1.0426
PC (p-32:0) or PC (o-32:1) 1.1299 1.0180 0.9105 0.9416
PC (p-34:0) or PC (o-34:1) 0.8474 1.0408 0.9409 1.1710
PC (p-34:1) or PC (o-34:2) B 0.8879 0.9978 0.9409 1.1735
PC (p-36:3) or PC (o-36:4) 0.9265 0.9964 0.9502 1.1269
PC (p-38:4) or PC (o-38:5) A 0.8999 0.9962 0.9713 1.1327
PC (p-38:5) or PC (o-38:6) 0.8340 1.0138 0.9457 1.2065
PE (36:4) 0.8645 1.0498 0.9475 1.1382
PE (38:4) B 0.9094 1.0482 0.9443 1.0980
PE (38:6) 1.0503 0.9229 0.8577 1.1691
PE (p-36:1) or PE (o-36:2) 0.9086 0.9732 0.9607 1.1576
PE (p-36:2) or PE (o-36:3) 0.8372 1.0587 0.9352 1.1689
PE (p-36:4) or PE (o-36:5) 0.9366 1.0745 0.8842 1.1047
PE (p-36:5) or PE (o-36:6) 0.9361 1.0398 0.8524 1.1716
PE (p-38:2) or PE (o-38:3) 0.8238 1.0042 0.9430 1.2290
PE (p-38:3) or PE (o-38:4) 0.9439 0.9588 1.0558 1.0415
PE (p-38:5) or PE (o-38:6) 0.9150 1.0870 0.8647 1.1334
PE (p-38:6) or PE (o-38:7) 0.9437 0.9881 0.8701 1.1980
PE (p-40:5) or PE (o-40:6) 1.1479 0.9227 0.8661 1.0633
PE (p-40:6) or PE (o-40:7) 0.8912 0.9896 0.9304 1.1888
Run Hierarchial cluster analysis on this study | Run Heatmap cluster analysis on this study

Factors:

F1ph treatment:High | DO treatment:High
F2ph treatment:High | DO treatment:Low
F3ph treatment:Low | DO treatment:High
F4ph treatment:Low | DO treatment:Low
  logo