#METABOLOMICS WORKBENCH douglas_walker_20200619_083741 DATATRACK_ID:2058 STUDY_ID:ST001406 ANALYSIS_ID:AN002349 PROJECT_ID:PR000963
VERSION             	1
CREATED_ON             	June 22, 2020, 7:12 pm
#PROJECT
PR:PROJECT_TITLE                 	Environmental chemical burden in metabolic tissues and systemic biological
PR:PROJECT_TITLE                 	pathways in adolescent bariatric surgery patients: A pilot untargeted
PR:PROJECT_TITLE                 	metabolomic approach
PR:PROJECT_TYPE                  	Pilot Study
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	Background: Advances in untargeted metabolomic technologies have great potential
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	for insight into adverse metabolic effects underlying exposure to environmental
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	chemicals. However, important challenges need to be addressed, including how
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	biological response corresponds to the environmental chemical burden in
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	different target tissues. Aim: We performed a pilot study using state-of-the-art
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	ultra-high-resolution mass spectrometry (UHRMS) to characterize the burden of
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	lipophilic persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in metabolic tissues and
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	associated alterations in the plasma metabolome. Methods: We studied 11
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	adolescents with severe obesity at the time of bariatric surgery. We measured 18
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	POPs that can act as endocrine and metabolic disruptors (i.e. 2 dioxins, 11
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	organochlorine compounds [OCs] and 5 polybrominated diphenyl ethers [PBDEs]) in
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	visceral and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue (vAT and sAT), and liver
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	samples using gas chromatography with UHRMS. Biological pathways were evaluated
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	by measuring the plasma metabolome using high-resolution metabolomics. Network
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	and pathway enrichment analysis assessed correlations between the
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	tissue-specific burden of three frequently detected POPs (i.e.
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	p,p’-dichlorodiphenyldichloroethene [DDE], hexachlorobenzene [HCB] and
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	PBDE-47) and plasma metabolic pathways. Results: Concentrations of 4 OCs and 3
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	PBDEs were quantifiable in at least one metabolic tissue for >80% of
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	participants. All POPs had the highest median concentrations in adipose tissue,
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	especially sAT, except for PBDE-154, which had comparable average concentrations
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	across all tissues. Pathway analysis showed high correlations between
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	tissue-specific POPs and metabolic alterations in pathways of amino acid
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	metabolism, lipid and fatty acid metabolism, and carbohydrate metabolism.
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	Conclusions: Most of the measured POPs appear to accumulate preferentially in
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	adipose tissue compared to liver. Findings of plasma metabolic pathways
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	potentially associated with tissue-specific POPs concentrations merit further
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	investigation in larger populations. Keywords: persistent organic pollutants,
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	adipose tissue, liver, bariatric surgery, exposome, high-resolution metabolomics
PR:INSTITUTE                     	Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
PR:DEPARTMENT                    	Environmental Medicine and Public Health
PR:LABORATORY                    	High Resolution Exposomics Research Group
PR:LAST_NAME                     	Walker
PR:FIRST_NAME                    	Douglas
PR:ADDRESS                       	One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1057, New York, NY 10029
PR:EMAIL                         	douglas.walker@mssm.edu
PR:PHONE                         	212-241-9891
PR:FUNDING_SOURCE                	NIEHS: R21ES028903, R21ES029328, R21ES029681, R01ES029944, R01ES030364,
PR:FUNDING_SOURCE                	U2CES026561, U2CES030163, P30ES023515, P30 ES019776, P30ES007048, P01ES022845,
PR:FUNDING_SOURCE                	R01ES024946; EPA: RD-83544101
PR:PUBLICATIONS                  	Valvi D, Walker DI, Inge T, Bartell SM, Jenkins T, Helmrath M, Ziegler TR, La
PR:PUBLICATIONS                  	Merrill MA, Eckel SP, Conti D, Liang Y, Jones DP, McConnell R, Chatzi L. (2020).
PR:PUBLICATIONS                  	Environmental chemical burden in metabolic tissues and systemic biological
PR:PUBLICATIONS                  	pathways in adolescent bariatric surgery patients: A pilot untargeted
PR:PUBLICATIONS                  	metabolomic approach. Environment International. In Press.
PR:CONTRIBUTORS                  	Valvi D, Walker DI, Inge T, Bartell SM, Jenkins T, Helmrath M, Ziegler TR, La
PR:CONTRIBUTORS                  	Merrill MA, Eckel SP, Conti D, Liang Y, Jones DP, McConnell R, Chatzi L
#STUDY
ST:STUDY_TITLE                   	Environmental chemical burden in metabolic tissues and systemic biological
ST:STUDY_TITLE                   	pathways in adolescent bariatric surgery patients: A pilot untargeted
ST:STUDY_TITLE                   	metabolomic approach (part-II)
ST:STUDY_TYPE                    	Subcutaneous adipose tissue (AT); Visceral AT; Liver Tissue; Plasma
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	Background: Advances in untargeted metabolomic technologies have great potential
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	for insight into adverse metabolic effects underlying exposure to environmental
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	chemicals. However, important challenges need to be addressed, including how
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	biological response corresponds to the environmental chemical burden in
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	different target tissues. Aim: We performed a pilot study using state-of-the-art
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	ultra-high-resolution mass spectrometry (UHRMS) to characterize the burden of
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	lipophilic persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in metabolic tissues and
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	associated alterations in the plasma metabolome. Methods: We studied 11
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	adolescents with severe obesity at the time of bariatric surgery. We measured 18
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	POPs that can act as endocrine and metabolic disruptors (i.e. 2 dioxins, 11
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	organochlorine compounds [OCs] and 5 polybrominated diphenyl ethers [PBDEs]) in
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	visceral and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue (vAT and sAT), and liver
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	samples using gas chromatography with UHRMS. Biological pathways were evaluated
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	by measuring the plasma metabolome using high-resolution metabolomics. Network
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	and pathway enrichment analysis assessed correlations between the
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	tissue-specific burden of three frequently detected POPs (i.e.
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	p,p’-dichlorodiphenyldichloroethene [DDE], hexachlorobenzene [HCB] and
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	PBDE-47) and plasma metabolic pathways. Results: Concentrations of 4 OCs and 3
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	PBDEs were quantifiable in at least one metabolic tissue for >80% of
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	participants. All POPs had the highest median concentrations in adipose tissue,
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	especially sAT, except for PBDE-154, which had comparable average concentrations
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	across all tissues. Pathway analysis showed high correlations between
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	tissue-specific POPs and metabolic alterations in pathways of amino acid
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	metabolism, lipid and fatty acid metabolism, and carbohydrate metabolism.
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	Conclusions: Most of the measured POPs appear to accumulate preferentially in
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	adipose tissue compared to liver. Findings of plasma metabolic pathways
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	potentially associated with tissue-specific POPs concentrations merit further
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	investigation in larger populations.
ST:INSTITUTE                     	Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
ST:DEPARTMENT                    	Environmental Medicine and Public Health
ST:LABORATORY                    	High Resolution Exposomics Research Group
ST:LAST_NAME                     	Walker
ST:FIRST_NAME                    	Doug
ST:ADDRESS                       	One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1057, New York, NY 10029
ST:EMAIL                         	douglas.walker@mssm.edu
ST:PHONE                         	212-241-9891
ST:NUM_GROUPS                    	4
ST:TOTAL_SUBJECTS                	11
ST:NUM_MALES                     	1
ST:NUM_FEMALES                   	10
ST:STUDY_COMMENTS                	Upload #1: Visceral and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue, liver tissue.
ST:STUDY_COMMENTS                	Plasma metabolomics are in upload #2
ST:PUBLICATIONS                  	Valvi D, Walker DI, Inge T, Bartell SM, Jenkins T, Helmrath M, Ziegler TR, La
ST:PUBLICATIONS                  	Merrill MA, Eckel SP, Conti D, Liang Y, Jones DP, McConnell R, Chatzi L. (2020).
ST:PUBLICATIONS                  	Environmental chemical burden in metabolic tissues and systemic biological
ST:PUBLICATIONS                  	pathways in adolescent bariatric surgery patients: A pilot untargeted
ST:PUBLICATIONS                  	metabolomic approach. Environment International. In Press.
#SUBJECT
SU:SUBJECT_TYPE                  	Human
SU:SUBJECT_SPECIES               	Homo sapiens
SU:TAXONOMY_ID                   	9606
SU:AGE_OR_AGE_RANGE              	11-20 years
SU:GENDER                        	Male and female
#SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS:         	SUBJECT(optional)[tab]SAMPLE[tab]FACTORS(NAME:VALUE pairs separated by |)[tab]Raw file names and additional sample data
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_02	POTR_02_sAT	Tissue Type:INTRA-ABDOMINAL ADIPOSE TISSUE	Batch=1; Tissue Weight (g)=0.3613; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180308_003;DW_20180308_004
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_03	POTR_03_sAT	Tissue Type:INTRA-ABDOMINAL ADIPOSE TISSUE	Batch=1; Tissue Weight (g)=0.1314; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180308_007;DW_20180308_008
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_04	POTR_04_sAT	Tissue Type:INTRA-ABDOMINAL ADIPOSE TISSUE	Batch=1; Tissue Weight (g)=0.3944; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180308_009;DW_20180308_010
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_05	POTR_05_sAT	Tissue Type:INTRA-ABDOMINAL ADIPOSE TISSUE	Batch=1; Tissue Weight (g)=0.266; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180308_011;DW_20180308_012
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_06	POTR_06_sAT	Tissue Type:INTRA-ABDOMINAL ADIPOSE TISSUE	Batch=1; Tissue Weight (g)=0.2335; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180308_013;DW_20180308_014
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_07	POTR_07_sAT	Tissue Type:INTRA-ABDOMINAL ADIPOSE TISSUE	Batch=1; Tissue Weight (g)=0.2454; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180308_015;DW_20180308_016
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_08	POTR_08_sAT	Tissue Type:INTRA-ABDOMINAL ADIPOSE TISSUE	Batch=1; Tissue Weight (g)=0.2901; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180308_017;DW_20180308_018
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_09	POTR_09_sAT	Tissue Type:INTRA-ABDOMINAL ADIPOSE TISSUE	Batch=1; Tissue Weight (g)=0.3367; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180308_019;DW_20180308_020
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_10	POTR_10_sAT	Tissue Type:INTRA-ABDOMINAL ADIPOSE TISSUE	Batch=1; Tissue Weight (g)=0.6257; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180308_021;DW_20180308_022
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_11	POTR_11_sAT	Tissue Type:INTRA-ABDOMINAL ADIPOSE TISSUE	Batch=1; Tissue Weight (g)=0.1377; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180308_023;DW_20180308_024
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_12	POTR_12_sAT	Tissue Type:INTRA-ABDOMINAL ADIPOSE TISSUE	Batch=1; Tissue Weight (g)=0.5808; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180309_005;DW_20180309_006
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_02	POTR_02_vAT	Tissue Type:SUBCUTANEOUS ADIPOSE TISSUE	Batch=3; Tissue Weight (g)=0.7665; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180309_007;DW_20180309_008
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_03	POTR_03_vAT	Tissue Type:SUBCUTANEOUS ADIPOSE TISSUE	Batch=3; Tissue Weight (g)=0.139; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180309_009;DW_20180309_010
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_04	POTR_04_vAT	Tissue Type:SUBCUTANEOUS ADIPOSE TISSUE	Batch=3; Tissue Weight (g)=0.2564; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180309_011;DW_20180309_012
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_05	POTR_05_vAT	Tissue Type:SUBCUTANEOUS ADIPOSE TISSUE	Batch=3; Tissue Weight (g)=0.2598; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180309_013;DW_20180309_014
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_06	POTR_06_vAT	Tissue Type:SUBCUTANEOUS ADIPOSE TISSUE	Batch=3; Tissue Weight (g)=0.3776; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180309_015;DW_20180309_016
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_07	POTR_07_vAT	Tissue Type:SUBCUTANEOUS ADIPOSE TISSUE	Batch=3; Tissue Weight (g)=0.1319; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180309_017;DW_20180309_018
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_08	POTR_08_vAT	Tissue Type:SUBCUTANEOUS ADIPOSE TISSUE	Batch=3; Tissue Weight (g)=0.2847; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180309_019;DW_20180309_020
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_09	POTR_09_vAT	Tissue Type:SUBCUTANEOUS ADIPOSE TISSUE	Batch=3; Tissue Weight (g)=0.2846; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180309_021;DW_20180309_022
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_10	POTR_10_vAT	Tissue Type:SUBCUTANEOUS ADIPOSE TISSUE	Batch=3; Tissue Weight (g)=0.2978; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180309_023;DW_20180309_024
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_11	POTR_11_vAT	Tissue Type:SUBCUTANEOUS ADIPOSE TISSUE	Batch=3; Tissue Weight (g)=0.254; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180309_025;DW_20180309_026
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_12	POTR_12_vAT	Tissue Type:SUBCUTANEOUS ADIPOSE TISSUE	Batch=3; Tissue Weight (g)=0.1495; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180312_005;DW_20180312_006
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_02	POTR_02_Liver	Tissue Type:LIVER	Batch=2; Tissue Weight (g)=0.4708; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180312_007;DW_20180312_008
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_03	POTR_03_Liver	Tissue Type:LIVER	Batch=2; Tissue Weight (g)=0.1482; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180312_009;DW_20180312_010
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_04	POTR_04_Liver	Tissue Type:LIVER	Batch=2; Tissue Weight (g)=0.2413; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180312_011;DW_20180312_012
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_05	POTR_05_Liver	Tissue Type:LIVER	Batch=2; Tissue Weight (g)=0.38; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180312_013;DW_20180312_014
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_06	POTR_06_Liver	Tissue Type:LIVER	Batch=2; Tissue Weight (g)=0.3593; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180312_015;DW_20180312_016
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_07	POTR_07_Liver	Tissue Type:LIVER	Batch=2; Tissue Weight (g)=0.0918; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180312_017;DW_20180312_018
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_08	POTR_08_Liver	Tissue Type:LIVER	Batch=2; Tissue Weight (g)=0.5442; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180312_019;DW_20180312_020
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_09	POTR_09_Liver	Tissue Type:LIVER	Batch=2; Tissue Weight (g)=0.2081; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180312_021;DW_20180312_022
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_10	POTR_10_Liver	Tissue Type:LIVER	Batch=2; Tissue Weight (g)=0.1846; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180312_023;DW_20180312_024
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_11	POTR_11_Liver	Tissue Type:LIVER	Batch=2; Tissue Weight (g)=0.1493; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180312_025;DW_20180312_026
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	POTR_12	POTR_12_Liver	Tissue Type:LIVER	Batch=2; Tissue Weight (g)=0.1051; RAW_FILE_NAME=DW_20180312_025
#COLLECTION
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	Eleven adolescents 12–20 years of age undergoing bariatric surgery at
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	Cincinnati Children’s Hospital between 2006 and 2012 were offered enrollment
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	in a prospective biospecimen repository protocol (Pediatric Obesity Tissue
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	Repository [POTR]). Sample recruitment and other POTR features have been
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	reported previously (Davidson et al. 2017). Intraoperatively, visceral adipose
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	tissue (vAT) samples from the omentum, abdominal subcutaneous AT (sAT), and
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	liver samples were obtained by the surgeon and processed immediately in an area
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	adjacent to the operating room. All samples were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen,
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	then stored at −80°C. Plasma was collected pre-operatively after overnight
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	fasting and stored at -80°C. Written informed consent was obtained from
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	participants equal to or above 18 years old or from the parent or guardian if
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	participants were less than 18 years old. The study was approved by the
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	Institutional Review Board at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital.
CO:SAMPLE_TYPE                   	Adipose tissue
CO:STORAGE_CONDITIONS            	-80℃
#TREATMENT
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	The objective of the observational study was to evaluate the relationship
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	between adipose and liver tissue POPs and the plasma metabolome. All
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	participants underwent bariatric surgery at the time of tissue collection. No
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	other treatment or intervention was evaluated.
#SAMPLEPREP
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	Tissue POPs concentrations were measured in vAT, sAT and liver tissues collected
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	during surgery. All tissue samples were prepared in batches of 11 study samples
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	and 3 method blanks using a modified version of the QuECHERS method described by
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	(Zamariola et al. 2017). Briefly, 0.2-0.5g of tissue was weighed, placed in an
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	amber glass vial and treated with 3.5mL of LC-MS grade water. Each sample was
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	then spiked with 50μL internal standard solution prepared in 2-proponal that
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	was designed to represent environmental chemicals with a range of physiochemical
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	properties to monitor analysis QA/QC, and included 500 ng/mL [13C6]-Anthracene,
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	[13C12]-PCB28, [DIETHYL-D10]-Chlorpyrifos, [13C12]-PCB101, [13C12]-4,4'-DDE,
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	[13C12]-PCB153, [13C12]-PCB180, [13C12]-PBDE47, [13C10]-Mirex,
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	[13C6]-cis-Permethrin, [13C12]-PBDE99 and [13C12]-PBB153. Following addition of
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	the internal standard solution, the sample was then homogenized for 1 min and
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	placed in a sonicating bath for 10 min. The resulting homogenate was transferred
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	to a 50 mL conical tube containing 10mL acetonitrile, 4000mg MgSO4 and1000mg
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	NaCl, and vortexed for 5 min. After centrifuging, a 1.5mL aliquout was
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	transferred to a cleanup tube containing 50 mg primary and secondary amine
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	exchange material (PSA), 50 mg C18 and 150 mg MgSO4, vortex-mixed for 1 min and
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	centrifuged at max speed for 5 min. From the supernatant, a 1 mL aliquot was
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	transferred to a clean, glass tube and dried completely in a vacuum centrifuge
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	operated at 35°C. The residue was then resuspended in 50μL isooctane and
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	transferred to a GC vial containing a low volume insert and capped with a Teflon
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	lined cap until analysis.
SP:SAMPLEPREP_PROTOCOL_ID        	douglas_walker_Protocol_for_adipose_tissue_exposomics_v3_08Mar2018.pdf
SP:SAMPLEPREP_PROTOCOL_FILENAME  	douglas_walker_Protocol_for_adipose_tissue_exposomics_v3_08Mar2018.pdf
SP:PROCESSING_STORAGE_CONDITIONS 	Room temperature
#CHROMATOGRAPHY
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	Tissue extracts were analyzed using a Thermo Scientific 1310 gas chromatograph
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	connected to a Q Exactive GC Orbitrap GC-MS/MS ultra-high-resolution mass
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	spectrometer and Triplus RSH autosampler. A 2 µL aliquot of extract was
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	injected into an inlet maintained at 250ºC in pulsed split-less mode. The
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	analytes were separated on an Agilent DB-5MSUI capillary column (30m length ×
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	0.25mm inner diameter × 0.25µm film thickness) using high purity helium
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	(99.999% purity) as the carrier gas at a constant flow rate of 1 mL/min. The
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	oven temperature program consisted of an initial temperature of 100ºC for 1
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	min, increased to 180ºC at 25ºC/min; followed by a temperature ramp to 215ºC
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	at 5ºC/min, and finally increased to 300ºC at 25ºC/min and held for 10 min,
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	resulting in a total run time of 26.6 min.
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_TYPE           	GC
CH:INSTRUMENT_NAME               	Thermo Trace 1310
CH:COLUMN_NAME                   	Agilent DB5-MS (30m x 0.25mm, 0.25um)
CH:FLOW_RATE                     	1 mL/min
CH:INJECTION_TEMPERATURE         	250C
CH:INTERNAL_STANDARD             	[13C6]-Anthracene, [13C12]-PCB28, [DIETHYL-D10]-Chlorpyrifos, [13C12]-PCB101,
CH:INTERNAL_STANDARD             	[13C12]-4,4'-DDE, [13C12]-PCB153, [13C12]-PCB180, [13C12]-PBDE47, [13C10]-Mirex,
CH:INTERNAL_STANDARD             	[13C6]-cis-Permethrin, [13C12]-PBDE99 and [13C12]-PBB153
CH:SAMPLE_INJECTION              	2 uL
CH:ANALYTICAL_TIME               	26.6
CH:OVEN_TEMPERATURE              	The oven temperature program consisted of an initial temperature of 100ºC for 1
CH:OVEN_TEMPERATURE              	min, increased to 180ºC at 25ºC/min; followed by a temperature ramp to 215ºC
CH:OVEN_TEMPERATURE              	at 5ºC/min, and finally increased to 300ºC at 25ºC/min and held for 10 min
CH:TRANSFERLINE_TEMPERATURE      	280
CH:SAMPLE_SYRINGE_SIZE           	10uL
#ANALYSIS
AN:ANALYSIS_TYPE                 	MS
AN:LABORATORY_NAME               	Clinical Biomarkers Laboratory
AN:OPERATOR_NAME                 	Bill Liang
AN:ACQUISITION_DATE              	March 2018
AN:DATA_FORMAT                   	.Raw
#MS
MS:INSTRUMENT_NAME               	Thermo Q Exactive GC Orbitrap GC-MS/MS
MS:INSTRUMENT_TYPE               	Orbitrap
MS:MS_TYPE                       	EI
MS:ION_MODE                      	POSITIVE
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	Targeted peak assignment and integration was completed using TraceFinder
MS:ION_SOURCE_TEMPERATURE        	250C
MS:IONIZATION                    	Postive
MS:IONIZATION_ENERGY             	-70eV
#MS_METABOLITE_DATA
MS_METABOLITE_DATA:UNITS	pg/g
MS_METABOLITE_DATA_START
Samples	POTR_02_sAT	POTR_03_sAT	POTR_04_sAT	POTR_05_sAT	POTR_06_sAT	POTR_07_sAT	POTR_08_sAT	POTR_09_sAT	POTR_10_sAT	POTR_11_sAT	POTR_12_sAT	POTR_02_vAT	POTR_03_vAT	POTR_04_vAT	POTR_05_vAT	POTR_06_vAT	POTR_07_vAT	POTR_08_vAT	POTR_09_vAT	POTR_10_vAT	POTR_11_vAT	POTR_12_vAT	POTR_02_Liver	POTR_03_Liver	POTR_04_Liver	POTR_05_Liver	POTR_06_Liver	POTR_07_Liver	POTR_08_Liver	POTR_09_Liver	POTR_10_Liver	POTR_11_Liver	POTR_12_Liver
Factors	Tissue Type:INTRA-ABDOMINAL ADIPOSE TISSUE	Tissue Type:INTRA-ABDOMINAL ADIPOSE TISSUE	Tissue Type:INTRA-ABDOMINAL ADIPOSE TISSUE	Tissue Type:INTRA-ABDOMINAL ADIPOSE TISSUE	Tissue Type:INTRA-ABDOMINAL ADIPOSE TISSUE	Tissue Type:INTRA-ABDOMINAL ADIPOSE TISSUE	Tissue Type:INTRA-ABDOMINAL ADIPOSE TISSUE	Tissue Type:INTRA-ABDOMINAL ADIPOSE TISSUE	Tissue Type:INTRA-ABDOMINAL ADIPOSE TISSUE	Tissue Type:INTRA-ABDOMINAL ADIPOSE TISSUE	Tissue Type:INTRA-ABDOMINAL ADIPOSE TISSUE	Tissue Type:SUBCUTANEOUS ADIPOSE TISSUE	Tissue Type:SUBCUTANEOUS ADIPOSE TISSUE	Tissue Type:SUBCUTANEOUS ADIPOSE TISSUE	Tissue Type:SUBCUTANEOUS ADIPOSE TISSUE	Tissue Type:SUBCUTANEOUS ADIPOSE TISSUE	Tissue Type:SUBCUTANEOUS ADIPOSE TISSUE	Tissue Type:SUBCUTANEOUS ADIPOSE TISSUE	Tissue Type:SUBCUTANEOUS ADIPOSE TISSUE	Tissue Type:SUBCUTANEOUS ADIPOSE TISSUE	Tissue Type:SUBCUTANEOUS ADIPOSE TISSUE	Tissue Type:SUBCUTANEOUS ADIPOSE TISSUE	Tissue Type:LIVER	Tissue Type:LIVER	Tissue Type:LIVER	Tissue Type:LIVER	Tissue Type:LIVER	Tissue Type:LIVER	Tissue Type:LIVER	Tissue Type:LIVER	Tissue Type:LIVER	Tissue Type:LIVER	Tissue Type:LIVER
PCB-52	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	39.54	ND	37.75	91.13	197.52	28.40	ND	45.58	258.42	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	184.78	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	55.89	ND	ND	ND
PBDE-28	30.86	ND	ND	ND	ND	1028.69	60.51	86.72	131.26	ND	1010.40	89.58	ND	ND	ND	48.82	2051.42	ND	60.41	ND	2092.36	1190.90	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
p'p-DDE	7236.64	351.90	3532.15	5992.24	5557.92	6284.58	5303.77	5725.23	5645.20	3996.85	6263.13	9170.66	2345.33	7472.32	14144.22	4964.45	14439.87	6433.22	8091.20	11240.46	13810.68	10624.08	677.63	540.75	160.58	1042.72	433.93	396.56	455.69	476.46	403.97	1013.40	2898.82
o.p-DDE	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	564.74	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
PCB-28	93.83	265.02	330.62	149.54	107.04	168.08	323.98	514.22	519.12	143.43	162.96	203.56	668.18	1133.43	1696.27	243.80	894.91	417.30	1054.62	492.93	1195.06	818.93	38.98	116.58	ND	38.95	127.53	404.42	83.49	87.44	599.10	152.82	407.05
Hexachlorobenzene	658.13	ND	693.73	835.45	1112.86	1151.36	1048.40	1150.35	887.96	952.75	713.87	730.44	392.16	2083.04	1267.13	1333.00	2059.26	1804.25	1263.66	1525.63	1288.12	2558.82	116.14	164.51	ND	160.80	195.39	207.39	37.23	80.66	508.70	170.77	277.34
PCB-77	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
2,3,7,8-TCDF	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
2,3,7,8-TCDD	ND	222.54	ND	ND	ND	134.42	91.22	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	441.63	200.60	ND	ND	544.86	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	91.16	ND	96.45	ND	127.33	ND	ND	118.69	ND	ND	ND
PBDE-47	3611.93	263.81	2092.88	937.25	1881.23	26349.95	4261.06	2112.89	3144.95	3409.47	19397.14	5316.95	3323.21	3904.27	1764.52	1838.94	56613.64	6754.79	2658.03	7541.23	32391.98	34236.85	201.66	287.64	ND	ND	ND	538.29	99.14	ND	ND	1532.40	5447.87
PCB-101	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	208.27	ND	ND	ND	126.49	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
PCB-153	325.82	ND	91.65	247.62	202.15	72.83	109.68	575.21	556.30	142.42	271.46	442.58	ND	199.43	371.10	236.16	111.74	54.40	841.42	707.61	626.09	176.66	ND	98.98	ND	ND	ND	ND	18.42	ND	ND	ND	103.53
PCB-138	54.13	ND	ND	ND	69.48	ND	ND	107.39	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	18.74	286.77	ND	86.73	98.07	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
PCB-180	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	303.17	388.93	161.01	ND	42.94	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	252.76	815.71	81.62	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
PBDE-100	370.30	ND	367.04	ND	464.72	3203.87	637.15	140.04	739.21	359.35	3331.21	719.59	ND	638.13	159.82	381.79	7048.19	651.24	138.82	1468.84	5656.45	7495.14	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	587.92
PBDE-99	240.81	ND	118.12	ND	ND	5120.01	314.91	ND	225.83	ND	2634.26	847.22	ND	168.64	ND	ND	10099.36	351.60	ND	235.99	4549.32	5030.53	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	532.59
Trans-Nonachlor	554.02	ND	ND	429.06	563.49	511.19	645.06	641.45	357.56	109.97	487.00	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
Cis-Nonachlor	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	226.69	ND	251.14	650.65	222.81	1303.82	71.82	648.95	273.86	822.30	361.09	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
PCB-170	ND	ND	ND	ND	995.81	ND	ND	142.95	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	2177.00	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	2570.14	ND	ND	ND	938.04	ND	ND	ND	ND	1869.22
PBDE-154	1096.34	5115.36	434.95	1215.47	1481.84	1809.63	957.84	830.30	151.13	2342.61	125.17	158.44	6156.07	1311.23	1235.21	891.20	6398.79	1005.09	1493.78	717.96	1506.27	2346.96	809.71	3694.14	1783.52	522.14	1123.45	2668.31	315.39	750.52	2049.19	1931.00	4652.17
MS_METABOLITE_DATA_END
#METABOLITES
METABOLITES_START
metabolite_name	Class	mz	time	quantitated m/z measured	retention time measured	Mass error (ppm)	Time error (s)
PCB-52	Analyte	219.9841	672	219.9841	671.8082	-0.1214	-0.1918
PBDE-28	Analyte	245.9673	930	245.9676	929.7869	1.2002	-0.2131
p'p-DDE	Analyte	246.0000	862	245.9999	862.0917	-0.4720	0.4917
o.p-DDE	Analyte	246.0000	806	245.9997	806.1966	-1.0553	-0.2034
PCB-28	Analyte	255.9608	619	255.9609	619.0833	0.2297	-0.1167
Hexachlorobenzene	Analyte	283.8097	494	283.8098	494.4939	0.2100	0.0939
PCB-77	Analyte	291.9188	877	291.9189	877.3900	0.2210	0.1900
2,3,7,8-TCDF	Analyte	305.8978	986	305.8980	986.1893	0.8097	-0.2107
2,3,7,8-TCDD	Analyte	321.8927	1007	321.8928	1007.3544	0.4296	-0.0456
PBDE-47	Analyte	325.8757	1130	325.8759	1130.4329	0.6739	0.0329
PCB-101	Analyte	325.8797	814	325.8798	813.2907	0.1590	-0.3093
PCB-153	Analyte	359.8405	957	359.8407	956.6924	0.5780	-0.3076
PCB-138	Analyte	359.8405	1003	359.8406	1002.5033	0.3279	-0.0967
PCB-180	Analyte	393.8016	1118	393.8017	1118.7848	0.3197	0.3848
PBDE-100	Analyte	403.7860	1277	403.7864	1277.4486	0.9872	0.0486
PBDE-99	Analyte	403.7860	1325	403.7863	1324.4712	0.7056	-0.3288
Trans-Nonachlor	Analyte	408.7833	830	408.7834	830.2733	0.1874	-0.1267
Cis-Nonachlor	Analyte	408.7833	935	408.7834	934.5798	0.1267	-0.2202
PCB-170	Analyte	459.7339	1550	459.7339	1550.2848	0.0672	-0.1152
PBDE-154	Analyte	483.6941	1442	483.6945	1441.6214	0.8020	-0.1786
METABOLITES_END
#END