#METABOLOMICS WORKBENCH AParrish_20210924_133329 DATATRACK_ID:2864 STUDY_ID:ST001934 ANALYSIS_ID:AN003144 PROJECT_ID:PR001223
VERSION             	1
CREATED_ON             	September 24, 2021, 1:56 pm
#PROJECT
PR:PROJECT_TITLE                 	Differential Accumulation of Metabolites and Transcripts Related to Flavonoid, 
PR:PROJECT_TITLE                 	Styrylpyrone, and Galactolipid Biosynthesis in Equisetum Species and Tissue Types
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	Members of the genus Equisetum are often referred to as “living fossils”,
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	partly because they are the only extant representatives of the Equisetidae, a
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	subclass that was once prominent in late Paleozoic forests. Several classes of
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	specialized metabolites have been reported to occur in the genus Equisetum.
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	However, while steady progress is being made with identifying individual novel
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	metabolites of Equisetum, few if any analyses have focused on assessing the
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	chemical diversity across the genus. The present study focused on three species:
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	E. hyemale subsp. affine (rough horsetail or scouring rush), which is native to
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	the temperate to artic portions of North America; E. arvense (common horsetail),
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	which is endemic to the arctic and temperate regions of the northern hemisphere;
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	and Equisetum telmateia subsp. braunii (Milde) Hauke (giant horsetail), which is
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	native to western North America. Both below-ground rhizome and above-ground
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	shoot material was harvested from each species, extracted with aqueous methanol,
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	and subjected to non-targeted HPLC-QTOF-MS analysis. This research project was
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	designed to lay the foundation for continued research to capture the metabolic
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	capabilities in the ferns and fern allies.
PR:INSTITUTE                     	Washington State University
PR:DEPARTMENT                    	Institute of Biological Chemistry
PR:LABORATORY                    	Lange
PR:LAST_NAME                     	Lange
PR:FIRST_NAME                    	Mark
PR:ADDRESS                       	Plant Sciences Building, Pullman, Washington 99164
PR:EMAIL                         	lange-m@wsu.edu
PR:PHONE                         	+1-509-335-3794
#STUDY
ST:STUDY_TITLE                   	Differential Accumulation of Metabolites and Transcripts Related to Flavonoid, 
ST:STUDY_TITLE                   	Styrylpyrone, and Galactolipid Biosynthesis in Equisetum Species and Tissue Types
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	Members of the genus Equisetum are often referred to as “living fossils”,
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	partly because they are the only extant representatives of the Equisetidae, a
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	subclass that was once prominent in late Paleozoic forests. Several classes of
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	specialized metabolites have been reported to occur in the genus Equisetum.
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	However, while steady progress is being made with identifying individual novel
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	metabolites of Equisetum, few if any analyses have focused on assessing the
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	chemical diversity across the genus. The present study focused on three species:
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	E. hyemale subsp. affine (rough horsetail or scouring rush), which is native to
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	the temperate to artic portions of North America; E. arvense (common horsetail),
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	which is endemic to the arctic and temperate regions of the northern hemisphere;
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	and Equisetum telmateia subsp. braunii (Milde) Hauke (giant horsetail), which is
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	native to western North America. Both below-ground rhizome and above-ground
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	shoot material was harvested from each species, extracted with aqueous methanol,
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	and subjected to non-targeted HPLC-QTOF-MS analysis. This research project was
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	designed to lay the foundation for continued research to capture the metabolic
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	capabilities in the ferns and fern allies.
ST:INSTITUTE                     	Washington State University
ST:DEPARTMENT                    	Institute of Biological Chemistry
ST:LABORATORY                    	Lange
ST:LAST_NAME                     	Lange
ST:FIRST_NAME                    	Mark
ST:ADDRESS                       	Plant Sciences Building, Pullman, Washington 99164
ST:EMAIL                         	lange-m@wsu.edu
ST:PHONE                         	+1-509-335-3794
ST:NUM_GROUPS                    	6
ST:TOTAL_SUBJECTS                	30
#SUBJECT
SU:SUBJECT_TYPE                  	Plant
SU:SUBJECT_SPECIES               	Equisetum arvense;Equisetum hyemale;Equisetum telmateia
#SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS:         	SUBJECT(optional)[tab]SAMPLE[tab]FACTORS(NAME:VALUE pairs separated by |)[tab]Raw file names and additional sample data
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	Ea_rhiz_1	Species:E. arvense | Organ:rhizome	RAW_FILE_NAME=EA.R1.d
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	Ea_rhiz_2	Species:E. arvense | Organ:rhizome	RAW_FILE_NAME=EA.R2.d
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	Ea_rhiz_3	Species:E. arvense | Organ:rhizome	RAW_FILE_NAME=EA.R3.d
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	Ea_rhiz_4	Species:E. arvense | Organ:rhizome	RAW_FILE_NAME=EA.R4.d
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	Ea_rhiz_5	Species:E. arvense | Organ:rhizome	RAW_FILE_NAME=EA.R5.d
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	Ea_stem_1	Species:E. arvense | Organ:stem	RAW_FILE_NAME=EA.S1.d
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	Ea_stem_2	Species:E. arvense | Organ:stem	RAW_FILE_NAME=EA.S2.d
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	Ea_stem_3	Species:E. arvense | Organ:stem	RAW_FILE_NAME=EA.S3.d
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	Ea_stem_4	Species:E. arvense | Organ:stem	RAW_FILE_NAME=EA.S4.d
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	Ea_stem_5	Species:E. arvense | Organ:stem	RAW_FILE_NAME=EA.S5.d
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	Eh_rhiz_1	Species:E. hyemale | Organ:rhizome	RAW_FILE_NAME=EH.R1.d
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	Eh_rhiz_2	Species:E. hyemale | Organ:rhizome	RAW_FILE_NAME=EH.R2.d
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	Eh_rhiz_3	Species:E. hyemale | Organ:rhizome	RAW_FILE_NAME=EH.R3.d
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	Eh_rhiz_4	Species:E. hyemale | Organ:rhizome	RAW_FILE_NAME=EH.R4.d
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	Eh_rhiz_5	Species:E. hyemale | Organ:rhizome	RAW_FILE_NAME=EH.R5.d
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	Eh_stem_1	Species:E. hyemale | Organ:stem	RAW_FILE_NAME=EH.S1.d
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	Eh_stem_2	Species:E. hyemale | Organ:stem	RAW_FILE_NAME=EH.S2.d
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	Eh_stem_3	Species:E. hyemale | Organ:stem	RAW_FILE_NAME=EH.S3.d
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	Eh_stem_4	Species:E. hyemale | Organ:stem	RAW_FILE_NAME=EH.S4.d
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	Eh_stem_5	Species:E. hyemale | Organ:stem	RAW_FILE_NAME=EH.S5.d
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	Et_rhiz_1	Species:E. telmateia | Organ:rhizome	RAW_FILE_NAME=ET.R1.d
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	Et_rhiz_2	Species:E. telmateia | Organ:rhizome	RAW_FILE_NAME=ET.R2.d
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	Et_rhiz_3	Species:E. telmateia | Organ:rhizome	RAW_FILE_NAME=ET.R3.d
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	Et_rhiz_4	Species:E. telmateia | Organ:rhizome	RAW_FILE_NAME=ET.R4.d
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	Et_rhiz_5	Species:E. telmateia | Organ:rhizome	RAW_FILE_NAME=ET.R5.d
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	Et_stem_1	Species:E. telmateia | Organ:stem	RAW_FILE_NAME=ET.S1.d
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	Et_stem_2	Species:E. telmateia | Organ:stem	RAW_FILE_NAME=ET.S2.d
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	Et_stem_3	Species:E. telmateia | Organ:stem	RAW_FILE_NAME=ET.S3.d
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	Et_stem_4	Species:E. telmateia | Organ:stem	RAW_FILE_NAME=ET.S4.d
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	Et_stem_5	Species:E. telmateia | Organ:stem	RAW_FILE_NAME=ET.S5.d
#COLLECTION
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	E. arvense, E. hyemale and E. telmateia (voucher specimens deposited with the 
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	John G. Searle Herbarium of the Field Museum, Chicago, IL, USA) were maintained 
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	in a greenhouse under ambient lighting, with supplemental lighting from sodium-
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	vapor lamps. The photosynthetically active radiation varied from 15 to 25 mol 
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	m-2 d-1. Temperatures ranged between 22 and 27 °C and the humidity was set to 70
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	 ± 10 %. Five biological replicates (separate plants) were harvested at the same 
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	time of day for below-ground rhizomes and above-ground stems of vegetative 
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	shoots. Samples were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and freeze-dried (aerial 
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	parts for 5 days, rhizomes for 7 days). Lyophilized material was submerged in 
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	liquid nitrogen, homogenized using mortar and pestle. 
CO:SAMPLE_TYPE                   	Tissue homogenate
CO:STORAGE_CONDITIONS            	-80 °C
#TREATMENT
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	No Treatment
#SAMPLEPREP
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	Five biological replicates (separate plants) were harvested at the same 
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	time of day for below-ground rhizomes and above-ground stems of vegetative 
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	shoots. Samples were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and freeze-dried (aerial 
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	parts for 5 days, rhizomes for 7 days). Lyophilized material was submerged in 
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	liquid nitrogen, homogenized using mortar and pestle. 
SP:EXTRACTION_METHOD             	Frozen tissue homogenate (30 mg per sample) was transferred to a 2 ml reaction 
SP:EXTRACTION_METHOD             	tube and extracted with 1 ml of 80 % aqueous methanol (containing 10 mg/l 
SP:EXTRACTION_METHOD             	anthracene-9-carboxylic acid as internal standard) by vigorous shaking (VX-2500 
SP:EXTRACTION_METHOD             	multi-tube vortexer, VWR Scientific, South Plainfield, NY, USA) for 10 min and 
SP:EXTRACTION_METHOD             	subsequent sonication for 20 min (FS30 ultrasonic cleaner, Fisher Scientific, 
SP:EXTRACTION_METHOD             	Hampton, NY, USA). Following centrifugation for 10 min at 13,000 × g (5415 
SP:EXTRACTION_METHOD             	microfuge, Eppendorf, Enfield, CT, USA), the supernatant was filtered through 
SP:EXTRACTION_METHOD             	0.22 µm polypropylene syringe filter tips, and the flow-through collected in 
SP:EXTRACTION_METHOD             	plastic inserts for 2 ml reaction vials.
#CHROMATOGRAPHY
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_TYPE           	HPLC
CH:INSTRUMENT_NAME               	Agilent 1290 HPLC
CH:COLUMN_NAME                   	HD Zorbax SB-Aq (100 × 2.1 × mm, 1.8 µm)
CH:FLOW_GRADIENT                 	5 % B to 10 % B at 5 min, 20 % B at 10 min, 80 % B at 35 min, 95 % B at 45 min
CH:FLOW_RATE                     	0.6 ml/min
CH:COLUMN_TEMPERATURE            	60 °C
CH:SOLVENT_A                     	0.1 % formic acid in water
CH:SOLVENT_B                     	0.1 % formic acid in acetonitrile
CH:INTERNAL_STANDARD             	10 mg/l Anthracene-9-carboxylic acid
CH:SAMPLE_INJECTION              	10 ul
CH:TARGET_SAMPLE_TEMPERATURE     	Autosampler set to 4 °C
#ANALYSIS
AN:ANALYSIS_TYPE                 	MS
AN:LABORATORY_NAME               	Lange
AN:OPERATOR_NAME                 	Parrish
AN:SOFTWARE_VERSION              	MassHunter Qualitative Analysis software version B.07.00 Service Pack 1 build
AN:SOFTWARE_VERSION              	7.0.7024.29, Profinder B.06.00 build 6.0.0625.0
#MS
MS:INSTRUMENT_NAME               	Agilent 6530 QTOF
MS:INSTRUMENT_TYPE               	QTOF
MS:MS_TYPE                       	ESI
MS:ION_MODE                      	POSITIVE
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	HPLC–QTOF–MS with electrospray ion source (positive ion mode) Raw data sets
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	were opened in the Profinder B.06.00 build 6.0.0625.0 software package (Agilent
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and molecular feature elements (MFEs)
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	obtained using the Batch Recursive Feature Extraction algorithm. Binning and
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	alignment tolerances were set to 10 % + 20 s for the retention time and 10 ppm +
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	2 mDa for the mass accuracy, and 0.0025 m/z + 5.0 ppm for the isotope grouping
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	space tolerance. Additional parameters that were considered for feature
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	extraction were quasi-molecular ions and adducts ([M+H]+, [M+Na]+, [M+K]+,
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	[M+NH4]+), dimers, neutral losses (H2O, H3PO4, C6H10O5 (glucose), C12H20O9
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	(rutinose), C12H20O10 (sophorose), C6H10O4 (rhamnose), and C5H8O4 (xylose)),
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	absolute peak height = 2000 counts, and occurrence required in a minimum of
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	four of the five replicates of each sample type. These pre-processing steps
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	generated 848 MFEs (849 including ISTD), and exported into an Excel spreadsheet.
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	Additional exclusion criteria for MFEs were: relative standard deviation of mass
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	accuracy > 5.0 ppm; percent relative standard deviation returned as ”NaN”
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	(Not a Number) or an empty cell; an unacceptably close accurate mass and
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	retention time (± 0.010 m/z and ± 0.02 min.; screened as duplicates); or if it
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	was a fragment. This additional filtering returned 544 remaining MFEs. Peak
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	areas of MFEs for each sample were normalized based on sample weight and the
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	peak area of the internal standard (MFEs without a peak area were filled in with
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	a nominal value of two).
MS:SOURCE_TEMPERATURE            	325 °C
MS:DATAFORMAT                    	.d
MS:NEBULIZER                     	2.4 bar
MS:MS_RESULTS_FILE               	ST001934_AN003144_Results.txt	UNITS:Peak area	Has m/z:Yes	Has RT:Yes	RT units:Minutes
#END