#METABOLOMICS WORKBENCH hwelhaven_20221019_123521 DATATRACK_ID:3522 STUDY_ID:ST002342 ANALYSIS_ID:AN003826
VERSION                          	1
CREATED_ON                       	12-15-2022
#PROJECT
PR:PROJECT_TITLE                 	Welhaven_Vahidi_JBMR
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	C57BL/6J male and female germ-free and conventional mice were housed at Montana
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	State University and then used to study differences in bone associated with
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	microbiome status and sex.
PR:INSTITUTE                     	Montana State University
PR:LAST_NAME                     	Welhaven
PR:FIRST_NAME                    	Hope
PR:ADDRESS                       	Culbertson Hall, 100
PR:EMAIL                         	hwelhaven@gmail.com
PR:PHONE                         	4066961526
PR:FUNDING_SOURCE                	National Science Foundation (CMMI 1554708, CMMI 2120239) and the National
PR:FUNDING_SOURCE                	Institutes of Health (NIAMS R01AR073964, NIGMS P20GM103474, NIH R03AG068680
PR:DOI                           	http://dx.doi.org/10.21228/M88X2F
#STUDY
ST:STUDY_TITLE                   	The gut microbiome has sexually dimorphic effects on bone tissue energy
ST:STUDY_TITLE                   	metabolism and multiscale bone quality in C57BL/6J mice
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	Male and female germ-free and conventional were euthanized at 20 weeks of age,
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	and various tissues were obtained to assess differences in bone properties
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	associated with microbiome status and sex. For metabolomic analyses, the humeri
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	was obtained, bone marrow was flushed using PBS, and subchondral bone
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	metabolites were extracted using a methanol:acetone precipitation approach.
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	Next, samples were injected, ionized, and data was acquired using LC-MS. Data
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	was processed and converted using MSConvert and XCMS. Following this step,
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	metabolic phenotypes of mice that differ by microbiome status and sex were
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	investigated using MetaboAnalyst. Differences in metabolism were related to
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	lipid, energy, and amino acid metabolism. Specifically, females, both
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	conventional and germ-free, had dysregulated lipid metabolism, whereas, males,
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	both conventional and germ-free had dysregulated amino acid metabolism. Other
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	differences detected between male and female mice that differ by germ-free
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	status corresponded to differences in bone strength, bone marrow adiposity, and
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	osteocyte density.
ST:INSTITUTE                     	Montana State University
ST:DEPARTMENT                    	Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, Chemistry & Biochemistry
ST:LAST_NAME                     	Welhaven
ST:FIRST_NAME                    	Hope
ST:ADDRESS                       	Culbertson Hall, 100
ST:EMAIL                         	hwelhaven@gmail.com
ST:PHONE                         	4066961526
ST:SUBMIT_DATE                   	2022-10-19
#SUBJECT
SU:SUBJECT_TYPE                  	Mammal
SU:SUBJECT_SPECIES               	Mus musculus
SU:TAXONOMY_ID                   	10090
SU:GENOTYPE_STRAIN               	C57Bl/6
SU:AGE_OR_AGE_RANGE              	20 weeks (at euthanasia)
SU:GENDER                        	Male and female
SU:ANIMAL_ANIMAL_SUPPLIER        	Jackson Labratories
SU:ANIMAL_LIGHT_CYCLE            	Standard light dark cycle
SU:ANIMAL_FEED                   	PicoLab Rodent Diet 20, 20% protein
#SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS:         	SUBJECT(optional)[tab]SAMPLE[tab]FACTORS(NAME:VALUE pairs separated by |)[tab]Additional sample data
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H27	Sex:Female | Microbiome Status:Control	RAW_FILE_NAME=H27
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H28	Sex:Female | Microbiome Status:Control	RAW_FILE_NAME=H28
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H29	Sex:Female | Microbiome Status:Control	RAW_FILE_NAME=H29
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H30	Sex:Female | Microbiome Status:Control	RAW_FILE_NAME=H30
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H31	Sex:Female | Microbiome Status:Control	RAW_FILE_NAME=H31
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H32	Sex:Female | Microbiome Status:Control	RAW_FILE_NAME=H32
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H33	Sex:Female | Microbiome Status:Control	RAW_FILE_NAME=H33
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H34	Sex:Female | Microbiome Status:Control	RAW_FILE_NAME=H34
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H35	Sex:Female | Microbiome Status:Control	RAW_FILE_NAME=H35
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H36	Sex:Female | Microbiome Status:Control	RAW_FILE_NAME=H36
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H1	Sex:Female | Microbiome Status:Germ-Free	RAW_FILE_NAME=H1
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H18	Sex:Female | Microbiome Status:Germ-Free	RAW_FILE_NAME=H18
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H19	Sex:Female | Microbiome Status:Germ-Free	RAW_FILE_NAME=H19
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H2	Sex:Female | Microbiome Status:Germ-Free	RAW_FILE_NAME=H2
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H20	Sex:Female | Microbiome Status:Germ-Free	RAW_FILE_NAME=H20
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H3	Sex:Female | Microbiome Status:Germ-Free	RAW_FILE_NAME=H3
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H10	Sex:Male | Microbiome Status:Control	RAW_FILE_NAME=H10
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H11	Sex:Male | Microbiome Status:Control	RAW_FILE_NAME=H11
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H12	Sex:Male | Microbiome Status:Control	RAW_FILE_NAME=H12
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H13	Sex:Male | Microbiome Status:Control	RAW_FILE_NAME=H13
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H4	Sex:Male | Microbiome Status:Control	RAW_FILE_NAME=H4
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H5	Sex:Male | Microbiome Status:Control	RAW_FILE_NAME=H5
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H6	Sex:Male | Microbiome Status:Control	RAW_FILE_NAME=H6
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H7	Sex:Male | Microbiome Status:Control	RAW_FILE_NAME=H7
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H8	Sex:Male | Microbiome Status:Control	RAW_FILE_NAME=H8
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H9	Sex:Male | Microbiome Status:Control	RAW_FILE_NAME=H9
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H14	Sex:Male | Microbiome Status:Germ-Free	RAW_FILE_NAME=H14
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H15	Sex:Male | Microbiome Status:Germ-Free	RAW_FILE_NAME=H15
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H16	Sex:Male | Microbiome Status:Germ-Free	RAW_FILE_NAME=H16
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H17	Sex:Male | Microbiome Status:Germ-Free	RAW_FILE_NAME=H17
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H21	Sex:Male | Microbiome Status:Germ-Free	RAW_FILE_NAME=H21
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H22	Sex:Male | Microbiome Status:Germ-Free	RAW_FILE_NAME=H22
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	H23	Sex:Male | Microbiome Status:Germ-Free	RAW_FILE_NAME=H23
#COLLECTION
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	Samples were collected following mouse euthanasia. The humerus was obtained and
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	bone marrow was flushed using PBS. Next, metabolites were extracted using
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	methanol:acetone.
CO:SAMPLE_TYPE                   	Bone
#TREATMENT
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	All C57Bl/6J mice (male, female, germ-free, conventional) were housed at Montana
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	State University. During this time, mice were kept on a light/dark cycle and fed
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	a standard chow diet ad libitum. Upon 20 weeks of age, mice were euthanized. No
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	additional factors such as injury, diet, or exercise occurred. Mice were
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	employed to analyze differences in bone at macro and micro levels that are
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	associated with the microbiome and sex.
#SAMPLEPREP
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	Once euthanized, tissues were dissected and harvested for various techniques.
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	For metabolomics, humeri samples underwent homogenization/crushing, extracted
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	with methanol:acetone, and were then subjected to rounds of vortexing and
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	centrifugation. Once metabolites were isolated, samples were dried via vacuum
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	concentration and resuspended with acetonitrile:water for LC-MS analysis.
#CHROMATOGRAPHY
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	Samples were analyzed using an Agilent 1290 UPLC coupled to an Agilent 6538
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	QTOF. All samples were run in normal phase using a Cogent Diamond Hydride HILIC
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	column (150 x 2.1 mm; 100Å pore size on a 4µm particle size). Solvents: 0.1%
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	formic acid in water (A), 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (B). Elution
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	gradient: 100 to 25% solvent B over 17 minutes, 0 to 70% solvent A over 20
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	minutes, at 21 minutes, B increases from 25% to 100% till 25 minutes while A
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	decreases from 70% to 0% till 25 minutes. The last 4 minutes act as a wash.
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	Total run time = 25 minute method (per sample)
CH:INSTRUMENT_NAME               	Agilent 1290
CH:COLUMN_NAME                   	Cogent Diamond Hydride (150 × 2.1mm,4um)
CH:FLOW_GRADIENT                 	100 to 25% solvent B over 17 minutes, 0 to 70% solvent A over 20 minutes, at 21
CH:FLOW_GRADIENT                 	minutes, B increases from 25% to 100% till 25 minutes while A decreases from 70%
CH:FLOW_GRADIENT                 	to 0% till 25 minutes. The last 4 minutes act as a wash.
CH:FLOW_RATE                     	0.400 mL/min
CH:INJECTION_TEMPERATURE         	4C
CH:SOLVENT_A                     	100% water; 0.1% formic acid
CH:SOLVENT_B                     	100% acetonitrile; 0.1% formic acid
CH:ANALYTICAL_TIME               	25 minutes
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_TYPE           	HILIC
#ANALYSIS
AN:ANALYSIS_TYPE                 	MS
AN:OPERATOR_NAME                 	Hope Welhaven
#MS
MS:INSTRUMENT_NAME               	Agilent 6538 QTOF
MS:INSTRUMENT_TYPE               	Single quadrupole
MS:MS_TYPE                       	ESI
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	Data was acquired in positive mode following a 25-minute method. Following
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	injection and acquisition, .d files were converted to .mzMLs using MSConvert
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	(Threshold peak filter value = 1000; Peak picking = true, 1-1; 32-bit, no z-lib
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	compression). Once .mzMLs were avaiable, XCMS was used (parameters reflected run
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	parameters = positive mode, feature detection 15 ppm, adducts = [M+H]+, [M+Na]+
MS:ION_MODE                      	POSITIVE
MS:MS_RESULTS_FILE               	ST002342_AN003826_Results.txt	UNITS:Peak Intensity	Has m/z:Yes	Has RT:Yes	RT units:Minutes
#END