#METABOLOMICS WORKBENCH chenmin_20220814_140231 DATATRACK_ID:3405 STUDY_ID:ST002397 ANALYSIS_ID:AN003904 PROJECT_ID:PR001544
VERSION             	1
CREATED_ON             	December 8, 2022, 11:09 am
#PROJECT
PR:PROJECT_TITLE                 	Quantify the absolute abundace of metabolite
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	Quantify the absolute abundace of metabolite of yeast under different specific
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	growth rate.
PR:INSTITUTE                     	Shanghai Center for Systems Biomedicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University
PR:LAST_NAME                     	Chen
PR:FIRST_NAME                    	Min
PR:ADDRESS                       	State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, East China University of Science
PR:ADDRESS                       	and Technology
PR:EMAIL                         	mchen531@163.com
PR:PHONE                         	18582480786
#STUDY
ST:STUDY_TITLE                   	System-level analysis of flux regulation of yeast show that glycolytic flux is
ST:STUDY_TITLE                   	controlled by allosteric regulation and enzyme phosphorylation
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	Energy metabolism is central for cellular function and has therefore evolved to
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	be tightly regulated such that energy production can be balanced to energy
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	demand. Energy is being produced in the central carbon metabolism (CCM) and even
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	though there has been extensive studies on how fluxes through the different
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	pathways in this part of metabolism are regulated. There is little understanding
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	of how fluxes are affected by posttranslational modifications and by allosteric
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	regulators. Here we integrated multi-omics data (intracellular metabolome,
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	extracellular metabolome, proteome, phosphoproteome, and fluxome) under 9
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	different chemostat conditions for building a mathematical model that could map
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	functional regulatory events (FREs) in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Using
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	hierarchical analysis combined with the mathematical model, we observed pathway
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	and metabolism-specific flux regulation mechanisms in the CCM. We also found
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	that the glycolytic flux increased with specific growth rate, and this increase
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	was accompanied by a decrease of both metabolites derived FREs and protein
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	phosphorylation level.
ST:INSTITUTE                     	Shanghai Center for Systems Biomedicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University
ST:LAST_NAME                     	Chen
ST:FIRST_NAME                    	Min
ST:ADDRESS                       	State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, East China University of Science
ST:ADDRESS                       	and Technology
ST:EMAIL                         	mchen531@163.com
ST:PHONE                         	18582480786
#SUBJECT
SU:SUBJECT_TYPE                  	Yeast
SU:SUBJECT_SPECIES               	Saccharomyces cerevisiae
SU:TAXONOMY_ID                   	4932
SU:GENDER                        	Not applicable
#FACTORS
#SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS:         	SUBJECT(optional)[tab]SAMPLE[tab]FACTORS(NAME:VALUE pairs separated by |)[tab]Raw file names and additional sample data
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	Wild-type	u0.027_pool1_PS	Treatment:Control	RAW_FILE_NAME=u0.027_pool1_PS.raw
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	Wild-type	u0.051_pool1_PS	Treatment:Glucose	RAW_FILE_NAME=u0.051_pool1_PS.raw
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	Wild-type	u0.118_pool1_PS	Treatment:Glucose	RAW_FILE_NAME=u0.118_pool1_PS.raw
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	Wild-type	u0.154_pool1_PS	Treatment:Glucose	RAW_FILE_NAME=u0.154_pool1_PS.raw
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	Wild-type	u0.207_pool1_PS	Treatment:Glucose	RAW_FILE_NAME=u0.207_pool1_PS.raw
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	Wild-type	u0.249_pool1_PS	Treatment:Glucose	RAW_FILE_NAME=u0.249_pool1_PS.raw
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	Wild-type	u0.316_pool1_PS	Treatment:Glucose	RAW_FILE_NAME=u0.316_pool1_PS.raw
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	Wild-type	u0.355_pool1_PS	Treatment:Glucose	RAW_FILE_NAME=u0.355_pool1_PS.raw
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	Wild-type	u0.385_pool1_PS	Treatment:Glucose	RAW_FILE_NAME=u0.385_pool1_PS.raw
#COLLECTION
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	Cells were washed with cold PBS and them flash-frozen in liquid N2
CO:SAMPLE_TYPE                   	Yeast cells
CO:STORAGE_CONDITIONS            	-80℃
#TREATMENT
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	For quantification of intracellular metabolite concentrations,1.0 mL-broth
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	samples were rapidly withdrawn and quenched in pre-weighed tubes containing 5 mL
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	cold (−40 °C) pure methanol followed immediately by vigorous vortexing. The
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	quenched samples were rapidly weighed and poured into a filtration device
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	containing a cellulose membrane and previously layered with 15 mL of cold
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	methanol (−40 °C). Subsequently, a vacuum was applied followed by an
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	immediate additional washing step with 15 mL cold methanol (−40 °C). The
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	filter containing the cold washed biomass was then transferred into a 50
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	mL-falcon tube containing 30 mL of preheated (75 °C) aqueous ethanol solution
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	(75% v/v). 100 μL of 13C cell extract was added to the tube as an internal
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	standard. The tube containing the sample was then tightly closed, shaken
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	vigorously, and placed into a water bath at 95 °C during 3 min for metabolite
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	extraction. The tubes were then cooled using an ice bath and the filter was
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	removed. This extract was then concentrated by complete evaporation of the
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	ethanol–water mixture under vacuum, and resuspended in 500 μL milliQ water.
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	After a first centrifugation at 15000 g for 5 min at 1 °C, the supernatant was
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	transferred into a centrifugal filter unit and centrifuged again at the same
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	conditions. The filtrate was placed into a screw-capped polypropylene vial and
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	stored at −80 °C until further analysis. Samples were analyzed by LC-MS.
#SAMPLEPREP
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	Total liquids are divided into liquid phase vials.
SP:PROCESSING_STORAGE_CONDITIONS 	4℃
SP:EXTRACT_STORAGE               	On ice
#CHROMATOGRAPHY
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_TYPE           	Reversed phase
CH:INSTRUMENT_NAME               	Waters NanoAcquity
CH:COLUMN_NAME                   	Waters Acquity BEH Amide (150 x 2.1mm, 1.7um)
CH:FLOW_RATE                     	0.2ml/min
CH:COLUMN_TEMPERATURE            	40
CH:SOLVENT_A                     	Ammonium formate (5mM)
CH:SOLVENT_B                     	85% Acetonitrile
#ANALYSIS
AN:ANALYSIS_TYPE                 	MS
#MS
MS:INSTRUMENT_NAME               	Thermo TSQ Quantum Ultra
MS:INSTRUMENT_TYPE               	Triple quadrupole
MS:MS_TYPE                       	ESI
MS:ION_MODE                      	NEGATIVE
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	Xcalibur
#MS_METABOLITE_DATA
MS_METABOLITE_DATA:UNITS	umol/l
MS_METABOLITE_DATA_START
Samples	u0.027_pool1_PS	u0.051_pool1_PS	u0.118_pool1_PS	u0.154_pool1_PS	u0.207_pool1_PS	u0.249_pool1_PS	u0.316_pool1_PS	u0.355_pool1_PS	u0.385_pool1_PS
Factors	Treatment:Control	Treatment:Glucose	Treatment:Glucose	Treatment:Glucose	Treatment:Glucose	Treatment:Glucose	Treatment:Glucose	Treatment:Glucose	Treatment:Glucose
phosphoenolpyruvic acid	8.618601621	2.232683467	1.120280261	1.760134851	6.713984464	0.768511953	0.347016882	0.968514442	1.019077823
glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate	0.121460635	0.045694607	0.072591789	0.042970954	0.16307067	0.066297482	0.063039568	1.445282221	0.032929685
3-phospho-D-glyceric acid	4.635480583	8.679707733	5.070640609	10.45270648	4.189350549	3.179532337	3.087335884	3.488473162	3.51207178
D-erythrose 4-phosphate	0.093330407	0.0138	0.0101	0.011245	0.109881056	0.009675	0.0085	0.367645649	0.430754257
D-ribose 5-phosphate	0.324964141	0.216170497	0.576211772	0.333079912	0.699808488	1.161806496	0.515096491	0.986549867	1.641584908
α-D-glucose 6-phosphate	4.103195807	8.166494567	11.48597458	7.526147112	10.80558548	19.73160388	9.118207763	9.218333573	9.50267798
fructose 6-phosphate	2.262115348	1.957638298	2.451041802	1.392696194	7.091994652	4.84674652	2.504595383	4.620218219	4.637077431
6-phospho-D-gluconic acid	0.713146304	1.204102396	1.272544054	1.497844732	2.515091761	1.995743245	0.658659938	2.626381483	0.58745655
sedoheptulose 7-phosphate	0.27877432	3.489365414	8.063400301	9.214010696	7.57191164	13.53878418	6.38561305	1.837382897	2.194246412
β-D-fructofuranose 1,6-bisphosphate	0.556389372	1.062707867	1.245841842	1.442486943	1.497032062	2.939011244	2.086310307	1.497297273	0.719646884
MS_METABOLITE_DATA_END
#METABOLITES
METABOLITES_START
metabolite_name	retention index	quantified m/z	PubChem ID	KEGG ID
phosphoenolpyruvic acid	10.26	167.04196	1005	C00074
glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate	5.2	169.05784	729 	C00661
3-phospho-D-glyceric acid	9.99	185.0572	439183  
D-erythrose 4-phosphate	4.4	199.08382	122357  	C00279
D-ribose 5-phosphate	5.19	229.11	439167  	C00117
α-D-glucose 6-phosphate	5.15	259.13578	439958  	C00092
fructose 6-phosphate	5.17	259.13578	69507  	C00085
6-phospho-D-gluconic acid	9.97	275.13518	91493  
sedoheptulose 7-phosphate	5.16	289.1618	165007  	C05382
β-D-fructofuranose 1,6-bisphosphate	13.5	339.1157	5460765  	C00354
METABOLITES_END
#END