Return to study ST002381 main page

MB Sample ID: SA237588

Local Sample ID:586
Subject ID:SU002470
Subject Type:Bacteria
Subject Species:Ruegeria pomeroyi

Select appropriate tab below to view additional metadata details:


Subject:

Subject ID:SU002470
Subject Type:Bacteria
Subject Species:Ruegeria pomeroyi

Factors:

Local Sample IDMB Sample IDFactor Level IDLevel ValueFactor Name
586SA237588FL029479cholineFactor_1 (substrate)
586SA237588FL029479ΔSPO1087Factor_2 (bacteria)
586SA237588FL029479TfinalFactor_2 (time)

Collection:

Collection ID:CO002463
Collection Summary:Cultures, 220 ul in 96 well plate (Fisher), were centrifuged at 2250 xg for 10 minutes to pellet cells. Supernatant, 200 ul, was collected and transferred to new 96 well plate. Samples were stored at -80 oC until further processing.
Collection Protocol Filename:2_Collection protocol_UGA_mutant_Nov2022.docx
Sample Type:Artificial sea water
Storage Conditions:-80℃

Treatment:

Treatment ID:TR002482
Treatment Summary:Mutants of Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS-3 were grown on minimal medium containing a single substrate as sole carbon source, they were screened for their ability to drawdown this target substrate. Screens were performed in L1 minimal medium modified to a salinity of 20 and amended with ammonium (3 mM) and kanamycin (50 ug ml-1). For each mutant-substrate pair, 3 replicate 220 µl cultures were prepared in 96 well plates by inoculating 3 ul of washed (3x) overnight mutant cultures into minimal medium containing the candidate substrate at 8 mM carbon concentration. Cultures were grown shaking at 25oC for 24 h or 36 h, depending on the growth rate supported by the carbon source. As a positive control, four wells with the same medium were inoculated with washed overnight cultures of the pooled-BarSeq library, used as a proxy for wild-type R. pomeroyi fitness but harboring a transposon/kanamycin resistance gene insertion.
Treatment Protocol Filename:3_Treatment protocol_UGA_mutant_Nov2022.docx

Sample Preparation:

Sampleprep ID:SP002476
Sampleprep Summary:Samples were thawed on ice. Each sample, 180 ul, was transferred to a 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube and mixed with 20 µL of a deuterated phosphate buffer (30 mmol L-1, pH 7.4) and an internal standard 2,2-dimethyl-2-silapentane-5-sulfonate-d6 (DSS, 1 mmol L-1) and transferred to a 3-mm NMR tube (Bruker).
Sampleprep Protocol Filename:4_Sample preparation protocol_UGA_mutant_Nov2022.docx

Analysis:

MB Sample ID:SA237588
Analysis ID:AN003880
Analysis Type:NMR
Analysis Protocol File:5_Analysis protocol_UGA_mutant_Nov2022.docx
Num Factors:118
Num Metabolites:21
Units:intensity_(peak_area)

NMR:

NMR ID:NM000256
Analysis ID:AN003880
Instrument Name:Bruker
Instrument Type:FT-NMR
NMR Experiment Type:1D-1H
NMR Comments:Analysis protocol: Instrument – Metabolites were analyzed by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy using a Bruker Avance lll 600 MHz spectrometer equipped with a 5-mm TCI cryoprobe. Data acquisition– Data were acquired by a one dimensional 1H experiment with water suppression (noesypr1d, Bruker) at 298K using TopSpin 3.6.4 (Bruker). For only glycerol, 1H J-resolved experiment (jresgpprqf) was used to avoid overlapping background peaks. Acquisition parameters are in ‘6_Acquisition and processing parameters_UGA_mutant_Nov2022.xlsx. Specific pulse programs used for individual samples are in ‘1_Study design_UGA_mutant_Nov2022.xlsx. Data processing – The raw Bruker spectra were processed using NMRPipe on NMRbox. For Jres, spectra were further symmetrized and tilted. Detailed spectrum processing parameters for individual NMR experiments are in ‘6_Acquisition and processing parameters_UGA_mutant_Nov2022.xlsx. NMRPipe scripts are available in folder ‘Data_analysis’. Downstream data analysis: Downstream analysis was conducted using Metabolomics Toolbox (https://github.com/artedison/Edison_Lab_Shared_Metabolomics_UGA) and MATLAB R2022a (MathWorks). All the input files, processing steps and scripts, and the output files are available in folder ‘Data_analysis’.
Spectrometer Frequency:600 MHz
  logo