Summary of Study ST001655

This data is available at the NIH Common Fund's National Metabolomics Data Repository (NMDR) website, the Metabolomics Workbench, https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org, where it has been assigned Project ID PR001061. The data can be accessed directly via it's Project DOI: 10.21228/M8JQ37 This work is supported by NIH grant, U2C- DK119886.

See: https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/about/howtocite.php

This study contains a large results data set and is not available in the mwTab file. It is only available for download via FTP as data file(s) here.

Show all samples  
Download mwTab file (text)   |  Download mwTab file(JSON)   |  Download data files (Contains raw data)
Study IDST001655
Study TitleCharacterization of anaphylaxis reveals different metabolic changes depending on severity and triggers - NMR (part-I)
Study SummaryBackground: Despite its increasing incidence, the underlying molecular processes of anaphylaxis remain unclear and there are not known biomarkers for appropriate diagnosis. The mechanism associated to the reactions still needs to be clarified in humans. The rapid onset and potentially fatal outcome in the absence of managed treatment, prevent its study and prompt obvious technical and ethical implications. Methods: Twenty episodes of anaphylaxis were analyzed. Sera was collected at different times: during the acute phase (T1), the recovery phase (T2) and around 2-3 months after the anaphylactic reaction (T0). The analysis included untargeted metabolomics combining liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and proton-nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR). Reactions were classified according to the trigger (food and/or drug) and severity (moderate and severe). Results: “Food T1 vs T2” and “moderate T1 vs T2” anaphylaxis comparisons showed clear metabolic patterns during the onset of an anaphylactic reaction, which differed from those induced by drugs, food+drug or severe anaphylaxis “T1 vs T2”. Moreover, the model of food anaphylaxis was able to distinguish the well-characterized IgE (beta-lactam) from non-IgE- mediated anaphylaxis (NSAIDs), suggesting a differential metabolic pathway associated with the mechanism of action. Moreover, metabolic differences between “moderate vs severe” at T1 and T0 were studied. Among the metabolites, glucose, lipids, cortisol, betaine and oleamide were observed altered. Conclusions: The results of the study provide the first evidence that different anaphylactic triggers, induce differential metabolic changes. Besides, the basal status might identify high risk patients, thus opening new ways to understand, diagnose and treat anaphylaxis.
Institute
The Centre of Metabolomics and Bioanalysis
DepartmentAnalytical chemistry
Last NameObeso Montero
First NameDavid
AddressAv. de Montepríncipe, s/n
Emaildavid.obesomontero@beca.ceu.es
Phone607535650
Submit Date2021-01-18
Num Groups2 groups
Total Subjects20
Raw Data AvailableYes
Raw Data File Type(s)d
Analysis Type DetailNMR
Release Date2022-01-18
Release Version1
David Obeso Montero David Obeso Montero
https://dx.doi.org/10.21228/M8JQ37
ftp://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/Studies/ application/zip

Select appropriate tab below to view additional metadata details:


Project:

Project ID:PR001061
Project DOI:doi: 10.21228/M8JQ37
Project Title:Characterization of anaphylaxis reveals different metabolic changes depending on severity and triggers.
Project Summary:Despite its increasing incidence, the underlying molecular processes of anaphylaxis remain unclear and there are not known biomarkers for appropriate diagnosis. The mechanism associated to the reactions still needs to be clarified in humans. The rapid onset and potentially fatal outcome in the absence of managed treatment, prevent its study and prompt obvious technical and ethical implications. Twenty episodes of anaphylaxis were analyzed. Sera was collected at different times: during the acute phase (T1), the recovery phase (T2) and around 2-3 months after the anaphylactic reaction (T0). The analysis included untargeted metabolomics combining liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and proton-nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR). Reactions were classified according to the trigger (food and/or drug) and severity (moderate and severe). “Food T1 vs T2” and “moderate T1 vs T2” anaphylaxis comparisons showed clear metabolic patterns during the onset of an anaphylactic reaction, which differed from those induced by drugs, food+drug or severe anaphylaxis “T1 vs T2”. Moreover, the model of food anaphylaxis was able to distinguish the well-characterized IgE (beta-lactam) from non-IgE- mediated anaphylaxis (NSAIDs), suggesting a differential metabolic pathway associated with the mechanism of action. Moreover, metabolic differences between “moderate vs severe” at T1 and T0 were studied. Among the metabolites, glucose, lipids, cortisol, betaine and oleamide were observed altered. The results of the study provide the first evidence that different anaphylactic triggers, induce differential metabolic changes. Besides, the basal status might identify high risk patients, thus opening new ways to understand, diagnose and treat anaphylaxis.
Institute:Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe
Department:Subdirección Médica, Departament de Salut València La Fe.
Last Name:Hernández Fernández de Rojas
First Name:Dolores
Address:Avinguda de Fernando Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 València, Valencia, España.
Email:hernandez_dol@gva.es
Phone:91 372 47 00 ext. 4662

Subject:

Subject ID:SU001732
Subject Type:Human
Subject Species:Homo sapiens
Taxonomy ID:9606
Gender:Male and female

Factors:

Subject type: Human; Subject species: Homo sapiens (Factor headings shown in green)

mb_sample_id local_sample_id Trigger
SA151815P15_t0Drug | Severity:Mild | Time:Time 0
SA151816P15_t1Drug | Severity:Mild | Time:Time 1
SA151817P17_t0Drug | Severity:Moderate | Time:Time 0
SA151818P1_t0Drug | Severity:Moderate | Time:Time 0
SA151819P3_t0Drug | Severity:Moderate | Time:Time 0
SA151820P1_t1Drug | Severity:Moderate | Time:Time 1
SA151821P17_t1Drug | Severity:Moderate | Time:Time 1
SA151822P3_t1Drug | Severity:Moderate | Time:Time 1
SA151823P1_t2Drug | Severity:Moderate | Time:Time 2
SA151824P17_t2Drug | Severity:Moderate | Time:Time 2
SA151825P19_t0Drug | Severity:Severe | Time:Time 0
SA151826P14_t0Drug | Severity:Severe | Time:Time 0
SA151827P4_t0Drug | Severity:Severe | Time:Time 0
SA151828P7_t0Drug | Severity:Severe | Time:Time 0
SA151829P13_t0Drug | Severity:Severe | Time:Time 0
SA151830P4_t1Drug | Severity:Severe | Time:Time 1
SA151831P13_t1Drug | Severity:Severe | Time:Time 1
SA151832P14_t1Drug | Severity:Severe | Time:Time 1
SA151833P19_t1Drug | Severity:Severe | Time:Time 1
SA151834P7_t1Drug | Severity:Severe | Time:Time 1
SA151835P7_t2Drug | Severity:Severe | Time:Time 2
SA151836P13_t2Drug | Severity:Severe | Time:Time 2
SA151837P14_t2Drug | Severity:Severe | Time:Time 2
SA151838P19_t2Drug | Severity:Severe | Time:Time 2
SA151839P4_t2Drug | Severity:Severe | Time:Time 2
SA151840P2_t0Food | Severity:Moderate | Time:Time 0
SA151841P16_t0Food | Severity:Moderate | Time:Time 0
SA151842P9_t0Food | Severity:Moderate | Time:Time 0
SA151843P18_t0Food | Severity:Moderate | Time:Time 0
SA151844P2_t1Food | Severity:Moderate | Time:Time 1
SA151845P9_t1Food | Severity:Moderate | Time:Time 1
SA151846P10_t1Food | Severity:Moderate | Time:Time 1
SA151847P18_t1Food | Severity:Moderate | Time:Time 1
SA151848P16_t1Food | Severity:Moderate | Time:Time 1
SA151849P9_t2Food | Severity:Moderate | Time:Time 2
SA151850P18_t2Food | Severity:Moderate | Time:Time 2
SA151851P2_t2Food | Severity:Moderate | Time:Time 2
SA151852P16_t2Food | Severity:Moderate | Time:Time 2
SA151853P10_t2Food | Severity:Moderate | Time:Time 2
SA151854P11_t0Food | Severity:Severe | Time:Time 0
SA151855P11_t1Food | Severity:Severe | Time:Time 1
SA151856P11_t2Food | Severity:Severe | Time:Time 2
SA151857P5_t1Idiopatic | Severity:Moderate | Time:Time 1
SA151858P5_t2Idiopatic | Severity:Moderate | Time:Time 2
SA151859P12_t0Idiopatic | Severity:Severe | Time:Time 0
SA151860P6_t0Idiopatic | Severity:Severe | Time:Time 0
SA151861P6_t1Idiopatic | Severity:Severe | Time:Time 1
SA151862P12_t1Idiopatic | Severity:Severe | Time:Time 1
SA151863P12_t2Idiopatic | Severity:Severe | Time:Time 2
SA151864P6_t2Idiopatic | Severity:Severe | Time:Time 2
SA151865P20_t0Other | Severity:Moderate | Time:Time 0
SA151866P8_t0Other | Severity:Moderate | Time:Time 0
SA151867P20_t1Other | Severity:Moderate | Time:Time 1
SA151868P8_t1Other | Severity:Moderate | Time:Time 1
SA151869P8_t2Other | Severity:Moderate | Time:Time 2
Showing results 1 to 55 of 55

Collection:

Collection ID:CO001725
Collection Summary:A prospective clinical and observational study of patients with anaphylactic reactions was performed. Patients of all ages and both sexes were recruited at outpatient clinics and the departments of Emergency, and other services at Hospital La Fe. All fulfilled clinical criteria of anaphylaxis and severity was graded following the classification by Brown, et al3. Patients were classified as food, drug or idiopathic origin, as well as in mild, moderate or severe according to the number of organs affected and clinical symptoms. The allergy evaluation was conducted by the Allergology Service of Hospital La Fe. The ethical committee approved the study protocol and all subjects were informed and provided written consent. Serum samples were taken during the acute moment of the reaction at the first moment of medical attention (< 2h, hereafter referred as ‘T1’), and after clinical recovery (approximately 2-4h later, referred to as ‘T2’). Patients were treated according to the Galaxy 2016 practical guide, using all necessary drugs to rescue them. Samples were collected, following specific standard operating procedures (SOPs)31-33. Briefly, these were collected in a vacutainer tube (Ref. 368965) and processed within the first 30 to 60 min after blood extraction. Sample aliquots were stored at -80ºC until further analyses. Subsequently, between 2-3 months after the anaphylaxis, a serum sample was taken when the allergy evaluation was performed (basal state, called ‘T0’).
Sample Type:Blood (serum)
Storage Conditions:-80℃

Treatment:

Treatment ID:TR001745
Treatment Summary:Patients were treated according to the Galaxy 2016 practical guide, using all necessary drugs to rescue them.

Sample Preparation:

Sampleprep ID:SP001738
Sampleprep Summary:After thawing the samples, 150 µL of cold acetonitrile (0.1% formic acid, v/v) was added to 50 µL of serum, vortex and kept at -20ºC for 30 min for protein precipitation. Then, 25 µl of cleaned supernatant were transferred to a 96 well-plate for UPLC-MS analysis. Finally, 125 µL of H2O (0.1% formic acid, v/v), and 2 µL of internal standard (IS) mix solution, containing reserpine, leucine enkephaline, caffeine-d9 and phenylalanine-d5 in H20:CH3OH (1:1, 0.1% v/v formic acid) at 20 µM were added to each sample. Blank samples were prepared by replacing serum by ultrapure H20 in order to identify potential artefacts from the tube, reagents and other materials. A quality control (QC) was prepared by mixing 10 µL from each prepared sample. Samples were randomly injected in the chromatographic system (UPLC-ToF-MS) injection a QC every 6 serum samples in order to avoid intra-batch variability, as well as to enhance quality and reproducibility. Blank analysis was performed at the beginning and at end of the sequence. Sample stability and analytical drift were investigated through the internal standard intensities.

Analysis:

Analysis ID:AN002702
Analysis Type:NMR

NMR:

NMR ID:NM000202
Analysis ID:AN002702
Instrument Name:Bruker 500MHz spectrometer
Instrument Type:FT-NMR
NMR Experiment Type:1D-1H
Spectrometer Frequency:500MHz
  logo