Summary of Study ST001311

This data is available at the NIH Common Fund's National Metabolomics Data Repository (NMDR) website, the Metabolomics Workbench, https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org, where it has been assigned Project ID PR000890. The data can be accessed directly via it's Project DOI: 10.21228/M8ND7K This work is supported by NIH grant, U2C- DK119886.

See: https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/about/howtocite.php

Perform statistical analysis  |  Show all samples  |  Show named metabolites  |  Download named metabolite data  
Download mwTab file (text)   |  Download mwTab file(JSON)   |  Download data files
Study IDST001311
Study TitleLipid expression in liver after early lifer exposure to an endocrine disruptor at 70 days postnatal (part-II)
Study TypeLipid expression after chemical exposure versus control
Study SummaryOur early-life environment has a profound influence on developing organs that impact metabolic function and determines disease susceptibility across the life-course. Using a rat model for exposure to an endocrine disrupting chemical (EDC), we show that early-life exposure causes metabolic dysfunction in adulthood and reprograms histone marks in the developing liver to accelerate acquisition of an adult epigenomic signature. This epigenomic reprogramming persists long after the initial exposure, but many reprogrammed genes remain transcriptionally silent with their impact on metabolism not revealed until a later life exposure to a Western-style diet. Diet-dependent metabolic disruption was largely driven by reprogramming of the Early Growth Response 1 (EGR1) transcriptome and production of metabolites in pathways linked to cholesterol, lipid and one-carbon metabolism. These findings demonstrate the importance of epigenome:environment interactions, which early in life accelerate epigenomic aging, and later in adulthood unlock metabolically restricted epigenetic reprogramming to drive metabolic dysfunction.
Institute
Baylor College of Medicine
Last NameWalker
First NameCheryl
Address1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
EmailCheryl.walker@bcm.edu
Phone713-798-8219
Submit Date2020-01-24
Num Groups2
Total Subjects10
Num Males10
Analysis Type DetailLC-MS
Release Date2020-03-11
Release Version1
Cheryl Walker Cheryl Walker
https://dx.doi.org/10.21228/M8ND7K
ftp://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/Studies/ application/zip

Select appropriate tab below to view additional metadata details:


Project:

Project ID:PR000890
Project DOI:doi: 10.21228/M8ND7K
Project Title:Metabolite and lipid profiling after early-life exposure to an endocrine disrupting chemical.
Project Type:Targeted and Untargeted MS analysis
Project Summary:Metabolic profiling in serum and liver tissue after early-life exposure to an endocrine disrupting chemical.
Institute:Baylor College of Medicine
Last Name:Walker
First Name:Cheryl
Address:1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
Email:Cheryl.walker@bcm.edu
Phone:713-798-8219

Subject:

Subject ID:SU001385
Subject Type:Mammal
Subject Species:Rattus norvegicus
Taxonomy ID:10116
Genotype Strain:Sprague Dawley
Age Or Age Range:70 days old
Gender:Male
Animal Animal Supplier:Harlan
Animal Housing:polycarbonate-free caging
Animal Light Cycle:14-hr light and 10-hr dark
Animal Feed:Phytoestrogen Reduced II 18-5, Ziegler Bros, Inc

Factors:

Subject type: Mammal; Subject species: Rattus norvegicus (Factor headings shown in green)

mb_sample_id local_sample_id Treatment
SA094659ncB3BPA
SA094660ncB4BPA
SA094661ncB5BPA
SA094662ncB2BPA
SA094663ncB1BPA
SA094664ncV2vehicle
SA094665ncV3vehicle
SA094666ncV4vehicle
SA094667ncV5vehicle
SA094668ncV1vehicle
Showing results 1 to 10 of 10

Collection:

Collection ID:CO001380
Collection Summary:Liver tissue was harvested on post-natal day 70 . Tissue was snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen.
Sample Type:Liver

Treatment:

Treatment ID:TR001400
Treatment Summary:Neonatal rats were treated with vehicle (sesame oil) or bisphenol A (BPA; 50 µg/kg dissolved in sesame oil) orally via pipette tip on post-natal days 1, 3, and 5. Littermates were randomly assigned to the treatment groups. BPA was obtained from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS). The dose and route of administration recapitulates human exposure to BPA. Tissue was harvested on postnatal day 70.

Sample Preparation:

Sampleprep ID:SP001393
Sampleprep Summary:Lipids were extracted using a modified Bligh-Dyer method. Fifty µL of serum and 25 mg of crushed liver was used for the extraction. The extraction was carried out using 2:2:2 volume ratio of water/methanol/dichloromethane at room temperature after spiking internal standards 17:0 LPC, 17:0 PC, 17:0 PE, 17:0 PG, 17:0 ceramide, 17:0 SM, 17:0PS, 17:0PA, 17:0 TAG, 17:0 MAG, 16:0/18:1 DAG, 17:0 CE. The organic layer was collected and completely dried under nitrogen. Before MS analysis, the dried extract was resuspended in 100 μL of Buffer B (10:5:85 Acetonitrile/water/Isopropyl alcohol) containing 10 mM NH4OAc and subjected to LC/MS. The lipidome was separated using reverse-phase chromatography.
Sampleprep Protocol Filename:unbiased.liver.MS.method.pdf

Combined analysis:

Analysis ID AN002182 AN002183
Analysis type MS MS
Chromatography type Reversed phase Reversed phase
Chromatography system Shimadzu Nexera-x2 Shimadzu Nexera-x2
Column 1.8 μm particle 50 × 2.1 mm 1.8 μm particle 50 × 2.1 mm
MS Type ESI ESI
MS instrument type Triple TOF Triple TOF
MS instrument name ABI Sciex 5600 TripleTOF ABI Sciex 5600 TripleTOF
Ion Mode POSITIVE NEGATIVE
Units peak intensity peak intensity

Chromatography:

Chromatography ID:CH001597
Instrument Name:Shimadzu Nexera-x2
Column Name:1.8 μm particle 50 × 2.1 mm
Column Temperature:55
Flow Gradient:linear gradient over a 20 min total run time, with 60% solvent A and 40% solvent B gradient in the first 10 minutes, then the gradient was ramped in a linear fashion to 100% solvent B which was maintained for 7 minutes. After that the system was switched back to 60% solvent B and 40% solvent A for 3 minutes.
Flow Rate:0.4 mL/min
Solvent A:40% acetonitrile/60% water; 10 mM ammonium acetate
Solvent B:10% acetonitrile/5% water/85% isopropanol; 10 mM ammonium acetate
Chromatography Type:Reversed phase
  
Chromatography ID:CH001598
Instrument Name:Shimadzu Nexera-x2
Column Name:1.8 μm particle 50 × 2.1 mm
Column Temperature:55
Flow Gradient:linear gradient over a 20 min total run time, with 60% solvent A and 40% solvent B gradient in the first 10 minutes, then the gradient was ramped in a linear fashion to 100% solvent B which was maintained for 7 minutes. After that the system was switched back to 60% solvent B and 40% solvent A for 3 minutes.
Flow Rate:0.4 mL/min
Solvent A:40% acetonitrile/60% water; 10 mM ammonium acetate
Solvent B:10% acetonitrile/5% water/85% isopropanol; 10 mM ammonium acetate
Chromatography Type:Reversed phase

MS:

MS ID:MS002029
Analysis ID:AN002182
Instrument Name:ABI Sciex 5600 TripleTOF
Instrument Type:Triple TOF
MS Type:ESI
MS Comments:For data acquisition through LC/MS analysis, we used a Shimadzu CTO-20A Nexera X2 UHPLC system equipped with a degasser, binary pump, thermostatted auto sampler, and a column oven for chromatographic separation. The column heater temperature was set at 55°C. For lipid separation, the 5 uL of the lipid extract was injected into a 1.8 μm particle 50 × 2.1 mm Acquity HSS UPLC T3 column (Waters, Milford, MA) which heats to 55°C. Acetonitrile/water (40:60, v/v) with 10 mM ammonium acetate was solvent A and acetonitrile/water/isopropanol (10:5:85 v/v) with 10 mM ammonium acetate was solvent B. For chromatographic elution we used a linear gradient over a 20 min total run time, with 60% solvent A and 40% solvent B gradient in the first 10 minutes, then the gradient was ramped in a linear fashion to 100% solvent B which was maintained for 7 minutes. After that the system was switched back to 60% solvent B and 40% solvent A for 3 minutes. The flow rate used for these experiments was 0.4 mL/min and the injection volume was 5μL. The column was equilibrated for 3 min before the next injection and run at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min for a total run time of 20 min. The data acquisition of each sample was performed in both positive and negative ionization modes using a TripleTOF 5600 equipped with a Turbo VTM ion source (AB Sciex, Concord, Canada). The column effluent was directed to the electrospray ionization source. The voltage of source was set to 5500 V for positive ionization and 4500 V for negative ionization mode, the declustering potential was set to 60 V, and the source temperature to 450oC for both modes. The curtain gas flow, nebulizer, and heater gas were set to 30, 40, and 45 units, respectively. The instrument performed one TOF MS survey scan (150 ms) and 15 MS/MS scans with a total duty cycle time of 2.4 s. The mass range in both modes was 50-1200 m/z. We controlled the acquisition of MS/MS spectra by data-dependent acquisition (DDA) function of the Analyst TF software (AB Sciex, Concord, Canada) with the following parameters: dynamic background subtraction, charge monitoring to exclude multiply charged ions and isotopes, and dynamic exclusion of former target ions for 9 s. Rolling collision energy spread was set whereby the software calculated the collision energy value to be applied as a function of m/z. Mass accuracy was maintained by the use of an automated calibrant delivery system interfaced to the second inlet of the DuoSpray source. Lipidomics Data Analysis. Raw data was converted to the mgf data format using proteoWizard software (2).The NIST MS PepSearch Program was used to search the converted files against LipidBlast libraries. The m/z width was determined by the mass accuracy of internal standards and were set to 0.001 for positive mode and to 0.005 for negative mode with an overall mass error of less than 2 parts per million. The minimum match factor used was set to 400. All raw data files were searched against the library of identified lipids based on mass and retention time using Multiquant 1.1.0.26 (ABsciex, Concord, Canada). Relative abundance of peak spectra was used for the analyses. Lipids that were identified in both positive and negative ion modes were initially analyzed separately for their relationship with outcome to ensure persistent results. As the relationship with outcome was not different in such lipids by ion modes, the values from positive mode were used in the final analysis. For lipid features with multiple adducts, the sum of spectral peaks from different adducts was used for the corresponding lipid. Identified lipids were quantified by normalizing against their respective internal standard. Quality control samples were used to monitor the overall quality of the lipid extraction and mass spectrometry analyses. The distributions of detected lipid species across the quality control samples indicated high reproducibility.
Ion Mode:POSITIVE
  
MS ID:MS002030
Analysis ID:AN002183
Instrument Name:ABI Sciex 5600 TripleTOF
Instrument Type:Triple TOF
MS Type:ESI
MS Comments:For data acquisition through LC/MS analysis, we used a Shimadzu CTO-20A Nexera X2 UHPLC system equipped with a degasser, binary pump, thermostatted auto sampler, and a column oven for chromatographic separation. The column heater temperature was set at 55°C. For lipid separation, the 5 uL of the lipid extract was injected into a 1.8 μm particle 50 × 2.1 mm Acquity HSS UPLC T3 column (Waters, Milford, MA) which heats to 55°C. Acetonitrile/water (40:60, v/v) with 10 mM ammonium acetate was solvent A and acetonitrile/water/isopropanol (10:5:85 v/v) with 10 mM ammonium acetate was solvent B. For chromatographic elution we used a linear gradient over a 20 min total run time, with 60% solvent A and 40% solvent B gradient in the first 10 minutes, then the gradient was ramped in a linear fashion to 100% solvent B which was maintained for 7 minutes. After that the system was switched back to 60% solvent B and 40% solvent A for 3 minutes. The flow rate used for these experiments was 0.4 mL/min and the injection volume was 5μL. The column was equilibrated for 3 min before the next injection and run at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min for a total run time of 20 min. The data acquisition of each sample was performed in both positive and negative ionization modes using a TripleTOF 5600 equipped with a Turbo VTM ion source (AB Sciex, Concord, Canada). The column effluent was directed to the electrospray ionization source. The voltage of source was set to 5500 V for positive ionization and 4500 V for negative ionization mode, the declustering potential was set to 60 V, and the source temperature to 450oC for both modes. The curtain gas flow, nebulizer, and heater gas were set to 30, 40, and 45 units, respectively. The instrument performed one TOF MS survey scan (150 ms) and 15 MS/MS scans with a total duty cycle time of 2.4 s. The mass range in both modes was 50-1200 m/z. We controlled the acquisition of MS/MS spectra by data-dependent acquisition (DDA) function of the Analyst TF software (AB Sciex, Concord, Canada) with the following parameters: dynamic background subtraction, charge monitoring to exclude multiply charged ions and isotopes, and dynamic exclusion of former target ions for 9 s. Rolling collision energy spread was set whereby the software calculated the collision energy value to be applied as a function of m/z. Mass accuracy was maintained by the use of an automated calibrant delivery system interfaced to the second inlet of the DuoSpray source. Lipidomics Data Analysis. Raw data was converted to the mgf data format using proteoWizard software (2).The NIST MS PepSearch Program was used to search the converted files against LipidBlast libraries. The m/z width was determined by the mass accuracy of internal standards and were set to 0.001 for positive mode and to 0.005 for negative mode with an overall mass error of less than 2 parts per million. The minimum match factor used was set to 400. All raw data files were searched against the library of identified lipids based on mass and retention time using Multiquant 1.1.0.26 (ABsciex, Concord, Canada). Relative abundance of peak spectra was used for the analyses. Lipids that were identified in both positive and negative ion modes were initially analyzed separately for their relationship with outcome to ensure persistent results. As the relationship with outcome was not different in such lipids by ion modes, the values from positive mode were used in the final analysis. For lipid features with multiple adducts, the sum of spectral peaks from different adducts was used for the corresponding lipid. Identified lipids were quantified by normalizing against their respective internal standard. Quality control samples were used to monitor the overall quality of the lipid extraction and mass spectrometry analyses. The distributions of detected lipid species across the quality control samples indicated high reproducibility.
Ion Mode:NEGATIVE
  logo