Summary of Study ST001862

This data is available at the NIH Common Fund's National Metabolomics Data Repository (NMDR) website, the Metabolomics Workbench, https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org, where it has been assigned Project ID PR001175. The data can be accessed directly via it's Project DOI: 10.21228/M8TM5F This work is supported by NIH grant, U2C- DK119886.

See: https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/about/howtocite.php

This study contains a large results data set and is not available in the mwTab file. It is only available for download via FTP as data file(s) here.

Perform statistical analysis  |  Show all samples  |  Show named metabolites  |  Download named metabolite data  
Download mwTab file (text)   |  Download mwTab file(JSON)   |  Download data files (Contains raw data)
Study IDST001862
Study TitleCross-feeding between intestinal pathobionts promotes their overgrowth during undernutrition
Study SummaryChild undernutrition is a global health issue associated with a high burden of infectious disease. Undernourished children display an overabundance of intestinal pathogens and pathobionts, and these bacteria induce enteric dysfunction in undernourished mice; however, the cause of their overgrowth remains poorly defined. Here, we show that disease-inducing human isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and Bacteroidales spp. are capable of multi-species symbiotic cross-feeding, resulting in synergistic growth of a mixed community in vitro. Growth synergy occurs uniquely under malnourished conditions limited in protein and iron: in this context, Bacteroidales spp. liberate diet- and mucin-derived sugars and Enterobacteriaceae spp. enhance the bioavailability of iron. Analysis of human microbiota datasets reveals that Bacteroidaceae and Enterobacteriaceae are strongly correlated in undernourished children, but not in adequately nourished children, consistent with a diet-dependent growth synergy in the human gut. Together these data suggest that dietary cross-feeding fuels the overgrowth of pathobionts in undernutrition.
Institute
University of British Columbia
DepartmentMichael Smith Laboratories
Last NameHuus
First NameKelsey
Address3125 East Mall
Emailkhuus@msl.ubc.ca
Phone+1-604-822-2210
Submit Date2021-07-11
Raw Data AvailableYes
Raw Data File Type(s)d
Analysis Type DetailLC-MS
Release Date2021-11-06
Release Version1
Kelsey Huus Kelsey Huus
https://dx.doi.org/10.21228/M8TM5F
ftp://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/Studies/ application/zip

Select appropriate tab below to view additional metadata details:


Project:

Project ID:PR001175
Project DOI:doi: 10.21228/M8TM5F
Project Title:Cross-feeding between intestinal pathobionts promotes their overgrowth during undernutrition
Project Summary:Child undernutrition is a global health issue associated with a high burden of infectious disease. Undernourished children display an overabundance of intestinal pathogens and pathobionts, and these bacteria induce enteric dysfunction in undernourished mice; however, the cause of their overgrowth remains poorly defined. Here, we show that disease-inducing human isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and Bacteroidales spp. are capable of multi-species symbiotic cross-feeding, resulting in synergistic growth of a mixed community in vitro. Growth synergy occurs uniquely under malnourished conditions limited in protein and iron: in this context, Bacteroidales spp. liberate diet- and mucin-derived sugars and Enterobacteriaceae spp. enhance the bioavailability of iron. Analysis of human microbiota datasets reveals that Bacteroidaceae and Enterobacteriaceae are strongly correlated in undernourished children, but not in adequately nourished children, consistent with a diet-dependent growth synergy in the human gut. Together these data suggest that dietary cross-feeding fuels the overgrowth of pathobionts in undernutrition.
Institute:University of British Columbia
Department:Michael Smith Laboratories
Last Name:Huus
First Name:Kelsey
Address:3125 East Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4, Canada
Email:khuus@msl.ubc.ca
Phone:+1-604-822-2210

Subject:

Subject ID:SU001939
Subject Type:Bacteria
Subject Species:Bacteroides spp. and Escherichia spp. (mixed communities)
Taxonomy ID:B. fragilis 3_1_12; B. vulgatus 3_1_40A; B. ovatus 3_8_47; B. dorei 5_1_36; P. distasonis 2_1_33B; E. coli 3_1_53; E. coli 4_1_47

Factors:

Subject type: Bacteria; Subject species: Bacteroides spp. and Escherichia spp. (mixed communities) (Factor headings shown in green)

mb_sample_id local_sample_id Factor
SA17437527_Blank30h
SA17437626_Blank20h
SA174377blank_media10h
SA174378blank_media20h
SA174379blank_media30h
SA17438025_Blank10h
SA17438128_Blank40h
SA174382BO5_16h16h
SA174383BO6_16h16h
SA174384E4_16h16h
SA17438509_E3-16h16h
SA174386B6_16h16h
SA17438701_B1-16h16h
SA174388B4_16h16h
SA174389B5_16h16h
SA174390E5_16h16h
SA174391E6_16h16h
SA17439204_BO1-16h16h
SA17439303_B3-16h16h
SA17439402_B2-16h16h
SA17439505_BO2-16h16h
SA174396BE6_16h16h
SA174397BE4_16h16h
SA174398BE5_16h16h
SA17439906_BO3-16h16h
SA174400BO4_16h16h
SA17440107_E1-16h16h
SA17440211_BE2-16h16h
SA17440312_BE3-16h16h
SA17440410_BE1-16h16h
SA17440508_E2-16h16h
SA174406E4_24h24h
SA174407BO6_24h24h
SA174408BO5_24h24h
SA174409E5_24h24h
SA174410BE5_24h24h
SA17441113_B1-24h24h
SA174412BE6_24h24h
SA174413BO4_24h24h
SA174414BE4_24h24h
SA174415E6_24h24h
SA174416B5_24h24h
SA17441721_E3-24h24h
SA17441820_E2-24h24h
SA17441922_BE1-24h24h
SA17442023_BE2-24h24h
SA17442124_BE3-24h24h
SA17442219_E1-24h24h
SA17442318_BO3-24h24h
SA17442414_B2-24h24h
SA174425B4_24h24h
SA17442615_B3-24h24h
SA17442716_BO1-24h24h
SA17442817_BO2-24h24h
SA174429B6_24h24h
Showing results 1 to 55 of 55

Collection:

Collection ID:CO001932
Collection Summary:Bacteria were grown anaerobically at 37ºC in MAL-M medium. Culture supernatants at 0, 16 and 24h were collected by centrifugation at 16000 g for 20 minutes. Supernatants were filter sterilized at 0.22 µM and stored at -70ºC before analysis.
Sample Type:Bacterial cells
Storage Conditions:Described in summary

Treatment:

Treatment ID:TR001951
Treatment Summary:The groups differ by bacterial community composition as follows: B, Bacteroidales mix (B. fragilis, B. vulgatus B. ovatus, B. dorei, P. distasonis); E, E. coli mix (E. coli 3_1_53 and E. coli 4_1_47); BE, Bacteroidales-E.coli mix (all seven strains as above); BO, B. ovatus only. Strains were inoculated in equal proportions based on normalized O.D. from overnight input cultures.

Sample Preparation:

Sampleprep ID:SP001945
Sampleprep Summary:Sugars Analysis Low molecular weight sugars and NAc-sugar amines were quantified by LC-MRM/MS at The Metabolomics Innovation Centre (TMIC) commercial service (University of Victoria , Genome BC Proteomics Centre), according to previously published UPLC-MRM/MS methods (Han et al 2016, Electrophoresis), with necessary modifications. In brief, a mixed stock solution of 13 low-MW sugars and 4 N-acetyl sugar amines was prepared with the use of their standard substances in 80% methanol at 500µM for each compound. This solution was then serially diluted with the same solvent to prepare calibration solutions in a concentration range of 0.002 to 125µM. For chemical derivatization, 20µL of each medium sample or each calibration solution was mixed in turn with 20µL of an internal standard solution containing 13C6-glucose, 13C6-mannose, 13C6-fructose and 13C5-ribose in water, 40µL of 200-mM 3-nitrophenylhydrazine hydrochloride solution in 60% methanol and 40µL of 200-mM EDC.HCl solution prepared in a mixed solvent of methanol/water/pyridine (60:40:5, v/v/v). The mixture was allowed to react at 50ºC for 90 min. SCFA Analysis Quantification of short-chain fatty acids was performed in-house according to a method developed by Han et al., with minor modifications(Han et al 2015, Analytica Chimica Acta). Briefly, 500µL of supernatant were mixed with 500µL of 50 % acetonitrile, then the mixture was vortexed for 5 minutes and centrifuged at 7000 x g for 5 minutes. 50 µL of the organic phase were derivatized adding 20µL of 200mM 3NPH in 50 % acetonitrile and 20 µL 120 mM EDC solution of 6 % pyridine in 50 % acetonitrile. The mixture was left under agitation at 40ºC for 30 minutes. After this time reaction was stopped adding 100 µL of 0.1 % formic acid in 90 % acetonitrile.

Combined analysis:

Analysis ID AN003018 AN003019
Analysis type MS MS
Chromatography type Normal phase Reversed phase
Chromatography system Agilent 1290 Agilent 1200
Column Phenomenex PFP UPLC (2.1 x 150mm,1.7um) Agilent Zorbax 300 C18 (250x4.6mm)
MS Type ESI ESI
MS instrument type Triple quadrupole Triple quadrupole
MS instrument name Agilent 6495 QQQ Agilent 6460 QQQ
Ion Mode NEGATIVE POSITIVE
Units µM µM

Chromatography:

Chromatography ID:CH002236
Chromatography Summary:Sugars Analysis
Methods Filename:methods_summary_ms.docx
Instrument Name:Agilent 1290
Column Name:Phenomenex PFP UPLC (2.1 x 150mm,1.7um)
Chromatography Type:Normal phase
  
Chromatography ID:CH002237
Chromatography Summary:SCFA Analysis
Methods Filename:methods_summary_ms.docx
Instrument Name:Agilent 1200
Column Name:Agilent Zorbax 300 C18 (250x4.6mm)
Chromatography Type:Reversed phase

MS:

MS ID:MS002807
Analysis ID:AN003018
Instrument Name:Agilent 6495 QQQ
Instrument Type:Triple quadrupole
MS Type:ESI
MS Comments:The raw data was acquired using the Agilent MassHunter® 7.0 software. After data acquisitions, linearly regressed calibration curves of individual compounds were constructed with the analyte-to-internal standard peak area ratios measured from injection of the calibration curves. For those compounds without their isotope-labelling analogues as the internal standards, 13C6-fructose was used a common internal standard. Concentrations of the analytes were calculated by interpolating the calibration curves of individual compounds with their analyte-to-internal standard peak area ratios measured from injection of the sample solutions.
Ion Mode:NEGATIVE
  
MS ID:MS002808
Analysis ID:AN003019
Instrument Name:Agilent 6460 QQQ
Instrument Type:Triple quadrupole
MS Type:ESI
MS Comments:A collision energy of 10V was used for multiple reaction monitoring (MRM), and LC-MS/MS data were analysed by Mass Hunter Qualitative Analysis B.06.00 software (Agilent Technologies). The identification and quantification of the SCFAs were carried out based on the retention time and mass fragmentation pattern comparing with standards. Six-point calibration curves made by peak area vs concentration of the pure standards were used to quantify the different SCFA. The linearity of the curves was determined by the coefficient of determination (R2), being higher than 0.99 for all standards. Concentrations of the SCFAs were calculated by interpolating the calibration curves of individual compounds.
Ion Mode:POSITIVE
  logo