Summary of Study ST001919

This data is available at the NIH Common Fund's National Metabolomics Data Repository (NMDR) website, the Metabolomics Workbench, https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org, where it has been assigned Project ID PR001210. The data can be accessed directly via it's Project DOI: 10.21228/M89D7G This work is supported by NIH grant, U2C- DK119886.

See: https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/about/howtocite.php

Perform statistical analysis  |  Show all samples  |  Show named metabolites  |  Download named metabolite data  
Download mwTab file (text)   |  Download mwTab file(JSON)   |  Download data files (Contains raw data)
Study IDST001919
Study TitleExposure to environmental contaminants is associated with alterations in hepatic lipid metabolism in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
Study SummaryBackground & aims: Recent experimental models and epidemiological studies suggest that specific environmental contaminants (ECs) contribute to the initiation and pathology of NAFLD. However, the underlying mechanisms linking EC exposure with NAFLD remain poorly understood and there is no data on their impact on the human liver metabolome. Herein, we hypothesized that exposure to ECs, particularly perfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS), impacts liver metabolism, specifically bile acid metabolism. Methods: In a well-characterized human NAFLD cohort of 105 individuals, we investigated the effects of EC exposure on liver metabolism. We characterized the liver (via biopsy) and circulating metabolomes using four mass spectrometry-based analytical platforms, and measured PFAS and other ECs in serum. We subsequently compared these results with an exposure study in a PPARa-humanized mouse model. Results: PFAS exposure appears associated with perturbation of key hepatic metabolic pathways previously found altered in NAFLD, particularly as regards bile acid metabolism. Specifically, we identified stronger associations between the liver metabolome, chemical exposure and NAFLD-associated clinical variables in female subjects versus males. The murine exposure study further corroborated our findings, vis-à-vis a sex-specific association between PFAS exposure and NAFLD-associated lipid changes. Conclusions: Females may be more sensitive to the harmful impacts of PFAS. Lipid-related changes subsequent to PFAS exposure may be secondary to the interplay between PFAS and bile acid metabolism.
Institute
Örebro University
DepartmentDepartment of Medical Sciences
Last NameMcGlinchey
First NameAidan
AddressSchool of Medical Sciences, Örebro, Örebro, 70281, Sweden
Emailaidan.mcglinchey@oru.se
Phone+46736485638
Submit Date2021-09-07
Raw Data AvailableYes
Raw Data File Type(s)mzdata.xml
Analysis Type DetailLC-MS
Release Date2021-11-03
Release Version1
Aidan McGlinchey Aidan McGlinchey
https://dx.doi.org/10.21228/M89D7G
ftp://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/Studies/ application/zip

Select appropriate tab below to view additional metadata details:


Project:

Project ID:PR001210
Project DOI:doi: 10.21228/M89D7G
Project Title:Exposure to environmental contaminants is associated with alterations in hepatic lipid metabolism in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
Project Summary:Background & aims: Recent experimental models and epidemiological studies suggest that specific environmental contaminants (ECs) contribute to the initiation and pathology of NAFLD. However, the underlying mechanisms linking EC exposure with NAFLD remain poorly understood and there is no data on their impact on the human liver metabolome. Herein, we hypothesized that exposure to ECs, particularly perfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS), impacts liver metabolism, specifically bile acid metabolism. Methods: In a well-characterized human NAFLD cohort of 105 individuals, we investigated the effects of EC exposure on liver metabolism. We characterized the liver (via biopsy) and circulating metabolomes using four mass spectrometry-based analytical platforms, and measured PFAS and other ECs in serum. We subsequently compared these results with an exposure study in a PPARa-humanized mouse model. Results: PFAS exposure appears associated with perturbation of key hepatic metabolic pathways previously found altered in NAFLD, particularly as regards bile acid metabolism. Specifically, we identified stronger associations between the liver metabolome, chemical exposure and NAFLD-associated clinical variables in female subjects versus males. The murine exposure study further corroborated our findings, vis-à-vis a sex-specific association between PFAS exposure and NAFLD-associated lipid changes. Conclusions: Females may be more sensitive to the harmful impacts of PFAS. Lipid-related changes subsequent to PFAS exposure may be secondary to the interplay between PFAS and bile acid metabolism.
Institute:Örebro University
Department:Department of Medical Sciences
Last Name:McGlinchey
First Name:Aidan
Address:School of Medical Sciences, Örebro, Örebro, 70281, Sweden
Email:aidan.mcglinchey@oru.se
Phone:+46736485638

Subject:

Subject ID:SU001997
Subject Type:Mammal
Subject Species:Mus musculus
Taxonomy ID:10090
Gender:Male and female

Factors:

Subject type: Mammal; Subject species: Mus musculus (Factor headings shown in green)

mb_sample_id local_sample_id Cohort Mouse Sex Genotype Ear Mark Treatment
SA1778300060_LC_20190903_sample_00312 10 Female KO 1x Rt PFOA
SA1778310060_LC_20190903_sample_00382 11 Male KO 1x Lt Vh
SA1778320060_LC_20190903_sample_00302 12 Male hPPARa None Vh
SA1778330060_LC_20190903_sample_00092 13 Male hPPARa 1x Rt PFOA
SA1778340060_LC_20190903_sample_00122 8 Female KO 1x Lt Vh
SA1778350060_LC_20190903_sample_00212 9 Female hPPARa None PFOA
SA1778360060_LC_20190903_sample_00113 14 Male KO None Vh
SA1778370060_LC_20190903_sample_00293 15 Male hPPARa 1x Rt Vh
SA1778380060_LC_20190903_sample_00023 16 Female hPPARa None Vh
SA1778390060_LC_20190903_sample_00083 17 Female KO 1x Rt Vh
SA1778400060_LC_20190903_sample_00163 18 Female hPPARa 1x Lt Vh
SA1778410060_LC_20190903_sample_00063 19 Female hPPARa 1x Bt Vh
SA1778420060_LC_20190903_sample_00254 20 Male hPPARa 1x Rt PFOA
SA1778430060_LC_20190903_sample_00224 21 Male KO 2x Rt PFOA
SA1778440060_LC_20190903_sample_00334 22 Female KO 1x Lt PFOA
SA1778450060_LC_20190903_sample_00365 23 Female KO None PFOA
SA1778460060_LC_20190903_sample_00345 24 Female KO 1x Rt PFOA
SA1778470060_LC_20190903_sample_00175 25 Female hPPARa 1x Lt PFOA
SA1778480060_LC_20190903_sample_00325 26 Female hPPARa 1x Bt PFOA
SA1778490060_LC_20190903_sample_00275 27 Male KO None PFOA
SA1778500060_LC_20190903_sample_00285 28 Male hPPARa 1x Rt PFOA
SA1778510060_LC_20190903_sample_00265 29 Male KO 1x Lt PFOA
SA1778520060_LC_20190903_sample_00416 30 Male hPPARa 1x Rt Vh
SA1778530060_LC_20190903_sample_00356 31 Male hPPARa 1x Lt Vh
SA1778540060_LC_20190903_sample_00186 32 Male KO 1x Bt Vh
SA1778550060_LC_20190903_sample_00076 33 Female KO None Vh
SA1778560060_LC_20190903_sample_00106 34 Female KO 1x Rt Vh
SA1778570060_LC_20190903_sample_00046 35 Female KO 1x Lt Vh
SA1778580060_LC_20190903_sample_00406 36 Female hPPARa 1x Bt Vh
SA1778590060_LC_20190903_sample_00236 37 Male hPPARa None PFOA
SA1778600060_LC_20190903_sample_00147 38 Male hPPARa None Vh
SA1778610060_LC_20190903_sample_00157 39 Male hPPARa 1x Rt Vh
SA1778620060_LC_20190903_sample_00397 40 Male hPPARa 1x Lt Vh
SA1778630060_LC_20190903_sample_00037 41 Male KO 1x Bt Vh
SA1778640060_LC_20190903_sample_00137 42 Female hPPARa None PFOA
SA1778650060_LC_20190903_sample_00058 43 Male hPPARa None PFOA
SA1778660060_LC_20190903_sample_00018 44 Female hPPARa 1x Lt PFOA
SA1778670060_LC_20190903_sample_00208 45 Female KO 1x Bt PFOA
SA1778680060_LC_20190903_sample_00378 46 Female hPPARa 2x Rt PFOA
SA1778690060_LC_20190903_sample_00248 47 Female hPPARa None Vh
SA1778700060_LC_20190903_sample_00198 48 Female hPPARa 1x Rt Vh
Showing results 1 to 41 of 41

Collection:

Collection ID:CO001990
Collection Summary:Male and female, humanized PPARa mice (hPPARa) were generated from mouse PPARa-null, human PPARa-heterozygous breeding pairs (generously provided by Dr. Frank Gonzalez, NCI). At weaning, mice were provided a custom diet based on the What we eat in America (NHANES 2013/2014) analysis (Research Diets, New Brunswick, NJ) (USDA, 2018): 51.8% carbohydrate, 33.5% fat (soybean oil, lard and butter, with cholesterol at 224 mg/1884 kcal), and 14.7% protein, as a % energy intake. Fats are in the form of . Vehicle (VH) and treatment water were prepared from NERL High Purity water (23-249-589, Thermo Fisher Scientific), prepared with PFAS removal. Mice were administered vehicle (0.5% sucrose) drinking water or PFOA (8 mM +0.5% sucrose) drinking water ad libitum for 6-7 weeks. Food and water consumption were determined on a per cage basis each week and previously reported. Body weight was measured weekly. Aliquots of liver for lipidomics were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80?C. A total of 11 female mice (5 VH and 6 PFOA) and 12 male mice (7 VH and 5 PFOA) were analyzed.
Sample Type:Liver
Storage Conditions:-80?

Treatment:

Treatment ID:TR002009
Treatment Summary:Male and female, humanized PPARa mice (hPPARa) were generated from mouse PPARa-null, human PPARa-heterozygous breeding pairs (generously provided by Dr. Frank Gonzalez, NCI). At weaning, mice were provided a custom diet based on the What we eat in America (NHANES 2013/2014) analysis (Research Diets, New Brunswick, NJ) (USDA, 2018): 51.8% carbohydrate, 33.5% fat (soybean oil, lard and butter, with cholesterol at 224 mg/1884 kcal), and 14.7% protein, as a % energy intake. Fats are in the form of . Vehicle (VH) and treatment water were prepared from NERL High Purity water (23-249-589, Thermo Fisher Scientific), prepared with PFAS removal. Mice were administered vehicle (0.5% sucrose) drinking water or PFOA (8 mM +0.5% sucrose) drinking water ad libitum for 6-7 weeks. Food and water consumption were determined on a per cage basis each week and previously reported. Body weight was measured weekly. Aliquots of liver for lipidomics were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80?C. A total of 11 female mice (5 VH and 6 PFOA) and 12 male mice (7 VH and 5 PFOA) were analyzed.

Sample Preparation:

Sampleprep ID:SP002003
Sampleprep Summary:Male and female, humanized PPARa mice (hPPARa) were generated from mouse PPARa-null, human PPARa-heterozygous breeding pairs (generously provided by Dr. Frank Gonzalez, NCI). At weaning, mice were provided a custom diet based on the What we eat in America (NHANES 2013/2014) analysis (Research Diets, New Brunswick, NJ) (USDA, 2018): 51.8% carbohydrate, 33.5% fat (soybean oil, lard and butter, with cholesterol at 224 mg/1884 kcal), and 14.7% protein, as a % energy intake. Fats are in the form of . Vehicle (VH) and treatment water were prepared from NERL High Purity water (23-249-589, Thermo Fisher Scientific), prepared with PFAS removal. Mice were administered vehicle (0.5% sucrose) drinking water or PFOA (8 mM +0.5% sucrose) drinking water ad libitum for 6-7 weeks. Food and water consumption were determined on a per cage basis each week and previously reported. Body weight was measured weekly. Aliquots of liver for lipidomics were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80?C. A total of 11 female mice (5 VH and 6 PFOA) and 12 male mice (7 VH and 5 PFOA) were analyzed. Liver tissues were first homogenized with cryo-homogenization (Covaris, CryoPrep CP02, Massachusetts, USA) and weighted (ca. 5 mg). 20 µL of internal standard mixture 1A was added. This mixture contained PC(17:0/0:0), PC(17:0/17:0), PE(17:0/17:0), PG(17:0/17:0)[rac], Cer(d18:1/17:0), PS(17:0/17:0) and PA(17:0/17:0) (Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc., Alabaster, AL) as well as MG(17:0/0:0/0:0)[rac], DG(17:0/17:0/0:0)[rac] and TG(17:0/17:0/17:0). The lipids were extracted using a mixture of HPLC-grade chloroform and methanol (2:1; 400 µL). 50 µl of 0.9% NaCl was added and the lower phase (200 µL) was collected and 20 µL of an internal standard mixture containing labeled PC (16:1/0:0-D3), PC(16:1/16:1-D6) and TG(16:0/16:0/16:0-13C3) was added. The extracts were analyzed on a Waters Q-Tof Premier mass spectrometer combined with an Acquity Ultra Performance LCTM. The column (at 50 °C) was an Acquity UPLCTM BEH C18 2.1 × 100 mm with 1.7 µm particles. The solvent system included A. ultrapure water (1% 1 M NH4Ac, 0.1% HCOOH) and B. LC/MS grade acetonitrile/isopropanol (1:1, 1% 1M NH4Ac, 0.1% HCOOH). The gradient started from 65% A / 35% B, reached 80% B in 2 min, 100% B in 7 min and remained there for 7 min. The flow rate was 0.400 ml/min and the injected amount was 2.0 µL (Acquity Sample Organizer, at 10 °C). Reserpine was used as the lock spray reference compound. The lipid profiling was carried out using electrospray ionization mode and the data were collected at a mass range of m/z 300-1200 with a scan duration of 0.2 sec. The data processing included alignment of peaks, peak integration, normalization and identification. Lipids were identified using an internal spectral library. The data were normalized using one or more internal standards representative of each class of lipid present in the samples: the intensity of each identified lipid was normalized by dividing it with the intensity of its corresponding standard and multiplying it by the concentration of the standard. All monoacyl lipids except cholesterol esters, such as monoacylglycerols and monoacylglycerophospholipids, were normalized with PC(17:0/0:0), all diacyl lipids except ethanolamine phospholipids were normalized with PC(17:0/17:0), all ceramides with Cer(d18:1/17:0), all diacyl ethanolamine phospholipids with PE(17:0/17:0), and TG and cholesterol esters with TG(17:0/17:0/17:0). Other (unidentified) molecular species were normalized with PC(17:0/0:0) for retention times < 300 s, PC(17:0/17:0) for a retention time between 300 s and 410 s, and TG(17:0/17:0/17:0) for longer retention times. Quality control of the method showed that the day-to-day repeatability of control serum samples, and the relative standard deviation (RSD) for values identified was on average below 25% and 20% for discovery and validation sECs, respectively. The internal standards added to all samples in the study had an average RSD of 25% and 13 % in the discovery and validation sECs.
Processing Storage Conditions:Described in summary
Extract Storage:-80?

Combined analysis:

Analysis ID AN003118
Analysis type MS
Chromatography type Reversed phase
Chromatography system Agilent 6545 LC/QTOF
Column Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18
MS Type ESI
MS instrument type QTOF
MS instrument name Agilent 6545 QTOF
Ion Mode UNSPECIFIED
Units Summarised value

Chromatography:

Chromatography ID:CH002303
Chromatography Summary:The extracts were analyzed on a Waters Q-Tof Premier mass spectrometer combined with an Acquity Ultra Performance LCTM. The column (at 50 °C) was an Acquity UPLCTM BEH C18 2.1 × 100 mm with 1.7 µm particles. The solvent system included A. ultrapure water (1% 1 M NH4Ac, 0.1% HCOOH) and B. LC/MS grade acetonitrile/isopropanol (1:1, 1% 1M NH4Ac, 0.1% HCOOH). The gradient started from 65% A / 35% B, reached 80% B in 2 min, 100% B in 7 min and remained there for 7 min. The flow rate was 0.400 ml/min and the injected amount was 2.0 µL (Acquity Sample Organizer, at 10 °C). Reserpine was used as the lock spray reference compound. The lipid profiling was carried out using electrospray ionization mode and the data were collected at a mass range of m/z 300-1200 with a scan duration of 0.2 sec.
Instrument Name:Agilent 6545 LC/QTOF
Column Name:Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18
Column Temperature:50
Flow Gradient:The gradient started from 65% A / 35% B, reached 80% B in 2 min, 100% B in 7 min and remained there for 7 min.
Flow Rate:0.400 ml/min
Solvent A:100% water; 0.1% formic acid; 10 mM ammonium acetate
Solvent B:50% acetonitrile/50% isopropanol 0.1% formic acid; 10 mM ammonium acetate
Chromatography Type:Reversed phase

MS:

MS ID:MS002899
Analysis ID:AN003118
Instrument Name:Agilent 6545 QTOF
Instrument Type:QTOF
MS Type:ESI
MS Comments:The data processing included alignment of peaks, peak integration, normalization and identification. Lipids were identified using an internal spectral library. The data were normalized using one or more internal standards representative of each class of lipid present in the samples: the intensity of each identified lipid was normalized by dividing it with the intensity of its corresponding standard and multiplying it by the concentration of the standard. All monoacyl lipids except cholesterol esters, such as monoacylglycerols and monoacylglycerophospholipids, were normalized with PC(17:0/0:0), all diacyl lipids except ethanolamine phospholipids were normalized with PC(17:0/17:0), all ceramides with Cer(d18:1/17:0), all diacyl ethanolamine phospholipids with PE(17:0/17:0), and TG and cholesterol esters with TG(17:0/17:0/17:0). Other (unidentified) molecular species were normalized with PC(17:0/0:0) for retention times < 300 s, PC(17:0/17:0) for a retention time between 300 s and 410 s, and TG(17:0/17:0/17:0) for longer retention times. Quality control of the method showed that the day-to-day repeatability of control serum samples, and the relative standard deviation (RSD) for values identified was on average below 25% and 20% for discovery and validation sECs, respectively. The internal standards added to all samples in the study had an average RSD of 25% and 13 % in the discovery and validation sECs.
Ion Mode:UNSPECIFIED
  logo