Summary of Study ST002210

This data is available at the NIH Common Fund's National Metabolomics Data Repository (NMDR) website, the Metabolomics Workbench, https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org, where it has been assigned Project ID PR001411. The data can be accessed directly via it's Project DOI: 10.21228/M8BB0F This work is supported by NIH grant, U2C- DK119886.

See: https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/about/howtocite.php

This study contains a large results data set and is not available in the mwTab file. It is only available for download via FTP as data file(s) here.

Show all samples  |  Perform analysis on untargeted data  
Download mwTab file (text)   |  Download mwTab file(JSON)   |  Download data files (Contains raw data)
Study IDST002210
Study TitleRevealing the Social Biomarkers of Residual Feed Intake by Using 16s rRNA and LC-MS/MS in Duroc Pig
Study SummaryFeed efficiency (FE) is a typical social affected trait. However, the mechanisms involved are not fully elucidated. According to the rank of residual feed intake (RFI)’s the social genetic effect (SGE), ten high and low pigs were selected, named LRI and HRI groups. The sampling of jejunal chyme after slaughter. 16S rRNA and LC-MS/MS were conducted to investigate the relationship between the gut microbiome or metabolites and the SGE of RFI. The results showed significant differences between HRI and LRI groups. Compared with the HRI group, Escherichia, Eubacterium, and Gemmiger were enriched in the LRI group (P < 0.01), whereas the abundance of Fusobacterium, Eubacterium, and Desulfovibrio in the HRI group were significantly higher than that in the LRI group (P < 0.01). In the metabolome, we found that Glycine, L-lysine, and L-tryptophan were positively correlated with RFI’s SGE. KEGG pathway analysis revealed that most differential metabolites were involved in amino acid metabolism. The Pearson correlation analysis of the candidate social biomarkers was carried out. Amino acid metabolites were discovered to have significant correlations with Escherichia and Fusobacterium. Therefore, Escherichia and Fusobacterium may influence the SGE of RFI through amino acid metabolism, thereby affecting feed efficiency.
Institute
Sichuan Agricultural University
Departmentanimal science and technology
LaboratoryGuoqing Tang Group
Last NameWang
First NameShujie
AddressHuimin Road, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
Email670186296@qq.com
Phone15680993607
Submit Date2022-07-02
Raw Data AvailableYes
Raw Data File Type(s)raw(Thermo)
Analysis Type DetailLC-MS
Release Date2022-07-11
Release Version1
Shujie Wang Shujie Wang
https://dx.doi.org/10.21228/M8BB0F
ftp://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/Studies/ application/zip

Select appropriate tab below to view additional metadata details:


Project:

Project ID:PR001411
Project DOI:doi: 10.21228/M8BB0F
Project Title:Revealing the Social Biomarkers of Residual Feed Intake by Using 16s rRNA and LC-MS/MS in Duroc Pig
Project Summary:Feed efficiency (FE) is a typical social affected trait. However, the mechanisms involved are not fully elucidated. According to the rank of residual feed intake (RFI)’s the social genetic effect (SGE), ten high and low pigs were selected, named LRI and HRI groups. The sampling of jejunal chyme after slaughter. 16S rRNA and LC-MS/MS were conducted to investigate the relationship between the gut microbiome or metabolites and the SGE of RFI. The results showed significant differences between HRI and LRI groups. Compared with the HRI group, Escherichia, Eubacterium, and Gemmiger were enriched in the LRI group (P < 0.01), whereas the abundance of Fusobacterium, Eubacterium, and Desulfovibrio in the HRI group were significantly higher than that in the LRI group (P < 0.01). In the metabolome, we found that Glycine, L-lysine, and L-tryptophan were positively correlated with RFI’s SGE. KEGG pathway analysis revealed that most differential metabolites were involved in amino acid metabolism. The Pearson correlation analysis of the candidate social biomarkers was carried out. Amino acid metabolites were discovered to have significant correlations with Escherichia and Fusobacterium. Therefore, Escherichia and Fusobacterium may influence the SGE of RFI through amino acid metabolism, thereby affecting feed efficiency.
Institute:Sichuan Agricultural University
Last Name:Wang
First Name:Shujie
Address:Huimin Road, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
Email:670186296@qq.com
Phone:15680993607

Subject:

Subject ID:SU002296
Subject Type:Mammal
Subject Species:Sus scrofa
Taxonomy ID:9823
Age Or Age Range:174-196day
Weight Or Weight Range:110-120kg
Gender:Female

Factors:

Subject type: Mammal; Subject species: Sus scrofa (Factor headings shown in green)

mb_sample_id local_sample_id Factor
SA211516LRI9high SGE of RFI
SA211517LRI10high SGE of RFI
SA211518LRI1high SGE of RFI
SA211519LRI7high SGE of RFI
SA211520LRI8high SGE of RFI
SA211521LRI6high SGE of RFI
SA211522LRI2high SGE of RFI
SA211523LRI4high SGE of RFI
SA211524LRI3high SGE of RFI
SA211525LRI5high SGE of RFI
SA211526HRI8low SGE of RFI
SA211527HRI9low SGE of RFI
SA211528HRI10low SGE of RFI
SA211529HRI7low SGE of RFI
SA211530HRI1low SGE of RFI
SA211531HRI2low SGE of RFI
SA211532HRI3low SGE of RFI
SA211533HRI4low SGE of RFI
SA211534HRI5low SGE of RFI
SA211535HRI6low SGE of RFI
Showing results 1 to 20 of 20

Collection:

Collection ID:CO002289
Collection Summary:After ranking the RFI values of 294 pigs, the model equation was used to calculate RFI’s SGE. The top 10 highest RFI’s SGEs and 10 lowest RFI’s SGEs were selected as the LRI and HRI groups, respectively. The jejunal contents of 20 pigs were collected after being humanely slaughtered. Stores samples in liquid nitrogen immediately. Then, the samples were stored at − 80 °C refrigerators.
Sample Type:Jejunum

Treatment:

Treatment ID:TR002308
Treatment Summary:After ranking the RFI values of 294 pigs, the model equation was used to calculate RFI’s SGE. The top 10 highest RFI’s SGEs and 10 lowest RFI’s SGEs were selected as the LRI and HRI groups, respectively. The jejunal contents of 20 pigs were collected after being humanely slaughtered. Stores samples in liquid nitrogen immediately. Then, the samples were stored at − 80 °C refrigerators.

Sample Preparation:

Sampleprep ID:SP002302
Sampleprep Summary:Weigh a 25 mg sample of jejunal content and add 400μl of extract (methanol: water = 4:1). Then, using the high-throughput tissue grinder, pulverize at -20 °C (60 Hz). After 30 minutes of vertexing at 40 kHz for 30 minutes at 5 °C for mixing and sonication, put the extracted samples at -20 °C for 30 minutes. After centrifuging the solution at 13,000 g for 15 minutes (4 °C), the supernatant was collected and fed into the LC-MS/MS apparatus for analysis.

Combined analysis:

Analysis ID AN003613 AN003614
Analysis type MS MS
Chromatography type HILIC HILIC
Chromatography system Waters 2D UPLC Waters 2D UPLC
Column Waters Acquity BEH C8 (100 x 2.1mm,1.7um) Waters Acquity BEH C8 (100 x 2.1mm,1.7um)
MS Type ESI ESI
MS instrument type Ion trap Ion trap
MS instrument name Thermo Q Exactive Focus Thermo Q Exactive Focus
Ion Mode POSITIVE NEGATIVE
Units peak area peak area

Chromatography:

Chromatography ID:CH002669
Instrument Name:Waters 2D UPLC
Column Name:Waters Acquity BEH C8 (100 x 2.1mm,1.7um)
Flow Gradient:0-1 min, 2% B; 1-9 min, 2%-98% B; 9-12 min, 98% B; 12-12.1 min, 98% B to 2% B; and 12.1-15min, 2% B
Flow Rate:0.35 mL/min
Solvent A:Pos mode:100% water; 0.1% formic acid, Neg mode:100% water; 10 mM ammonium formate
Solvent B:100% acetonitrile
Chromatography Type:HILIC

MS:

MS ID:MS003364
Analysis ID:AN003613
Instrument Name:Thermo Q Exactive Focus
Instrument Type:Ion trap
MS Type:ESI
MS Comments:The mobile phase consisted of 0.1% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile (B) in the positive mode, and in the negative mode, the mobile phase consisted of 10 mM ammonium formate (A) and acetonitrile (B). The gradient conditions were as follows: 0-1 min, 2% B; 1-9 min, 2%-98% B; 9-12 min, 98% B; 12-12.1 min, 98% B to 2% B; and 12.1-15min, 2% B. The flow rate was 0.35 mL/min and the injection volume was 5 μL. The mass spectrometric settings for positive/negative ionization modes were as follows: spray voltage, 3.8/−3.2 kV; sheath gas flow rate, 40 arbitrary units (arb); aux gas flow rate, 10 arb; aux gas heater temperature, 350 °C; capillary temperature, 320 °C. The full scan range was 70–1050 m/z with a resolution of 70000, and the automatic gain control (AGC) target for MS acquisitions was set to 3e6 with a maximum ion injection time of 100 ms. Top 3 precursors were selected for subsequent MSMS fragmentation with a maximum ion injection time of 50 ms and resolution of 17500, the AGC was 1e5. The stepped normalized collision energy was set to 20, 40 and 60 eV.
Ion Mode:POSITIVE
  
MS ID:MS003365
Analysis ID:AN003614
Instrument Name:Thermo Q Exactive Focus
Instrument Type:Ion trap
MS Type:ESI
MS Comments:The mobile phase consisted of 0.1% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile (B) in the positive mode, and in the negative mode, the mobile phase consisted of 10 mM ammonium formate (A) and acetonitrile (B). The gradient conditions were as follows: 0-1 min, 2% B; 1-9 min, 2%-98% B; 9-12 min, 98% B; 12-12.1 min, 98% B to 2% B; and 12.1-15min, 2% B. The flow rate was 0.35 mL/min and the injection volume was 5 μL. The mass spectrometric settings for positive/negative ionization modes were as follows: spray voltage, 3.8/−3.2 kV; sheath gas flow rate, 40 arbitrary units (arb); aux gas flow rate, 10 arb; aux gas heater temperature, 350 °C; capillary temperature, 320 °C. The full scan range was 70–1050 m/z with a resolution of 70000, and the automatic gain control (AGC) target for MS acquisitions was set to 3e6 with a maximum ion injection time of 100 ms. Top 3 precursors were selected for subsequent MSMS fragmentation with a maximum ion injection time of 50 ms and resolution of 17500, the AGC was 1e5. The stepped normalized collision energy was set to 20, 40 and 60 eV.
Ion Mode:NEGATIVE
  logo