Summary of Study ST003056

This data is available at the NIH Common Fund's National Metabolomics Data Repository (NMDR) website, the Metabolomics Workbench, https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org, where it has been assigned Project ID PR001699. The data can be accessed directly via it's Project DOI: 10.21228/M83B08 This work is supported by NIH grant, U2C- DK119886.

See: https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/about/howtocite.php

This study contains a large results data set and is not available in the mwTab file. It is only available for download via FTP as data file(s) here.

Show all samples  |  Perform analysis on untargeted data  
Download mwTab file (text)   |  Download mwTab file(JSON)   |  Download data files (Contains raw data)
Study IDST003056
Study TitleUntargeted metabolomics revealed multiple metabolic perturbations in plasma of T2D patients in response to Liraglutide - Part 2
Study SummaryDespite the global efforts put into the clinical research and studies in order to protect against Type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), the incidence of T2DM remains high causing a major health problem and impacting the health and care systems. Therefore, T2DM-related treatments and therapies are continuously invented for the clinical use, including Liraglutide. The last is a GLP-1 analogue and shows its beneficial health outcomes e.g., improved glycemic control, lower body weight, and reduced cardiovascular disease risks. The intrinsic mechanisms of these beneficial effects are not fully understood; however, our research group has previously published proteomics work demonstrating the involvement of certain important proteins in part in the beneficial health outcomes of Liraglutide. Since proteomics and metabolomics are complementary to each other in the context of the biological pathways, studying the metabolic impacts of Liraglutide on T2DM patients would add further information about the beneficial health outcomes of Liraglutide. Thus, herein, we performed an untargeted metabolomics approach for identifying metabolic pathways impacted by the treatment of Liraglutide in T2DM patients. Methods: Untargeted liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry was used for metabolomics analysis of plasma samples collected from T2DM patients (n=20) before and after receiving Liraglutide treatment. Metabolic profiling and related pathway and network analyses were conducted. Results: The metabolic profiling analyses identified 93 endogenous metabolites were significantly affected by the Liraglutide treatments, which 49 metabolites up-regulated and 44 metabolites down-regulated. Moreover, the metabolic pathway analyses revealed that the most pronounced metabolite and metabolic pathways that were affected by the Liraglutide treatment was Pentose and glucuronate interconversion, suggesting the last may be a potential target of the Liraglutide treatment could be involved in part in the beneficial effects seen in T2DM patients, specially, we found that glucuronate interconversion pathway which is known by its role in eliminating toxic and undesirable substances from the human body, impacted in Liraglutide treated patients. The last findings ar consistence with our previous proteomics findings. Conclusion: These findings, taken together with our previous results, provide a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms involved in the beneficial effects of Liraglutide at the proteomic and metabolic levels in T2DM patients.
Institute
King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre (KFSHRC)
Last NameAl Mogren
First NameMaha
AddressZahrawi Street, Al Maather, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia
Emailmalmogren@alfaisal.edu
Phone966541205332
Submit Date2023-11-03
Raw Data AvailableYes
Raw Data File Type(s)raw(Waters)
Analysis Type DetailLC-MS
Release Date2024-08-05
Release Version1
Maha Al Mogren Maha Al Mogren
https://dx.doi.org/10.21228/M83B08
ftp://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/Studies/ application/zip

Select appropriate tab below to view additional metadata details:


Project:

Project ID:PR001699
Project DOI:doi: 10.21228/M83B08
Project Title:Untargeted metabolomics revealed multiple metabolic perturbations in plasma of T2D patients in response to Liraglutide
Project Summary:Despite the global efforts put into the clinical research and studies in order to protect against Type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), the incidence of T2DM remains high causing a major health problem and impacting the health and care systems. Therefore, T2DM-related treatments and therapies are continuously invented for the clinical use, including Liraglutide. The last is a GLP-1 analogue and shows its beneficial health outcomes e.g., improved glycemic control, lower body weight, and reduced cardiovascular disease risks. The intrinsic mechanisms of these beneficial effects are not fully understood; however, our research group has previously published proteomics work demonstrating the involvement of certain important proteins in part in the beneficial health outcomes of Liraglutide. Since proteomics and metabolomics are complementary to each other in the context of the biological pathways, studying the metabolic impacts of Liraglutide on T2DM patients would add further information about the beneficial health outcomes of Liraglutide. Thus, herein, we performed an untargeted metabolomics approach for identifying metabolic pathways impacted by the treatment of Liraglutide in T2DM patients. Methods: Untargeted liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry was used for metabolomics analysis of plasma samples collected from T2DM patients (n=20) before and after receiving Liraglutide treatment. Metabolic profiling and related pathway and network analyses were conducted. Results: The metabolic profiling analyses identified 93 endogenous metabolites were significantly affected by the Liraglutide treatments, which 49 metabolites up-regulated and 44 metabolites down-regulated. Moreover, the metabolic pathway analyses revealed that the most pronounced metabolite and metabolic pathways that were affected by the Liraglutide treatment was Pentose and glucuronate interconversion, suggesting the last may be a potential target of the Liraglutide treatment could be involved in part in the beneficial effects seen in T2DM patients, specially, we found that glucuronate interconversion pathway which is known by its role in eliminating toxic and undesirable substances from the human body, impacted in Liraglutide treated patients. The last findings ar consistence with our previous proteomics findings. Conclusion: These findings, taken together with our previous results, provide a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms involved in the beneficial effects of Liraglutide at the proteomic and metabolic levels in T2DM patients.
Institute:King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre (KFSHRC)
Last Name:Al Mogren
First Name:Maha
Address:Zahrawi Street, Al Maather, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia
Email:malmogren@alfaisal.edu
Phone:966541205332

Subject:

Subject ID:SU003171
Subject Type:Human
Subject Species:Homo sapiens
Taxonomy ID:9606
Gender:Male
Species Group:Mammals

Factors:

Subject type: Human; Subject species: Homo sapiens (Factor headings shown in green)

mb_sample_id local_sample_id Factor
SA331650V1-10Post-treatment
SA331651V1-11Post-treatment
SA331652V1-13Post-treatment
SA331653V1-9Post-treatment
SA331654V1-12Post-treatment
SA331655V1-7Post-treatment
SA331656V1-3Post-treatment
SA331657V1-4Post-treatment
SA331658V1-6Post-treatment
SA331659V1-14Post-treatment
SA331660V1-8Post-treatment
SA331661V1-15Post-treatment
SA331662V1-21Post-treatment
SA331663V1-22Post-treatment
SA331664V1-25Post-treatment
SA331665V1-28Post-treatment
SA331666V1-20Post-treatment
SA331667V1-19Post-treatment
SA331668V1-16Post-treatment
SA331669V1-17Post-treatment
SA331670V1-18Post-treatment
SA331671V1-2Post-treatment
SA331672V1-1Post-treatment
SA331673V0-9Pre-treatment
SA331674V0-10Pre-treatment
SA331675V0-11Pre-treatment
SA331676V0-12Pre-treatment
SA331677V0-8Pre-treatment
SA331678V0-7Pre-treatment
SA331679V0-2Pre-treatment
SA331680V0-3Pre-treatment
SA331681V0-4Pre-treatment
SA331682V0-6Pre-treatment
SA331683V0-13Pre-treatment
SA331684V0-14Pre-treatment
SA331685V0-21Pre-treatment
SA331686V0-22Pre-treatment
SA331687V0-25Pre-treatment
SA331688V0-28Pre-treatment
SA331689V0-20Pre-treatment
SA331690V0-19Pre-treatment
SA331691V0-15Pre-treatment
SA331692V0-16Pre-treatment
SA331693V0-17Pre-treatment
SA331694V0-18Pre-treatment
SA331695V0-1Pre-treatment
Showing results 1 to 46 of 46

Collection:

Collection ID:CO003164
Collection Summary:The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (registration no. E-18-3075). Recruited patients were asked to sign a written informed consent form before enrolling. Twenty patients who were diagnosed with T2DM were referred to the King Khaled University Hospital's (KKUH), Obesity Research Center, where this study took place. Patients were treated with an appropriate dose of Liraglutide for a three months as described previously (8). Samples were taken pre-treatment and post-treatment. Note: the T2DM participants were on other medications including insulin and metformin beside the Liraglutide treatment.
Collection Protocol ID:Liraglutide_sample_collection.pdf
Collection Protocol Filename:Liraglutide_sample_collection.pdf
Sample Type:Blood (plasma)

Treatment:

Treatment ID:TR003180
Treatment Summary:Patients with indications of add-on liraglutide were started on treatment by their physician in a scaled-up dose from 0.6 mg to 1.8 mg of a once-daily subcutaneous injection over a period of three weeks. The follow-up visit was scheduled 3 months after receiving the full dose (1.8 mg) of liraglutide. Urine samples were collected at two time points: one sample before and another sample after treatment with liraglutide. Blood samples were collected by venipuncture into plain tubes (Vacutainer, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) from each patient after a 10 h fast. The plasma was separated by centrifugation (15 min, 3000× g), divided into several aliquots, and stored at −80 °C for further analysis.
Treatment Compound:Liraglutide

Sample Preparation:

Sampleprep ID:SP003177
Sampleprep Summary:Metabolite extraction was performed as mentioned elsewhere [1]. Briefly,100 μL aliquot of plasma was mixed with 900 μL of an extraction solvent 1:1 acetonitrile (ACN): methanol (MeOH). Concurrently, quality control (QC) samples were generated by taking aliquots from all samples to verify system stability. The mixtures were agitated on a thermomixer (Eppendorf, CITY, Germany) at 600 rpm and kept at room temperature (RT) for one hour. Subsequently, the samples underwent centrifugation at 16000 rpm, at a temperature of 4ºC, for a duration of 10 minutes. After centrifugation, 950 μL of the resultant supernatant was transferred into a 1.5-ml Eppendorf tube and then subjected to complete evaporation using a SpeedVac system (Christ, Germany). The dried samples were reconstituted with 100 μL of a 50% mobile phase A and B (A: 0.1% Formic acid in dH2O, B: 0.1% Formic acid in 50% ACN: MeOH). This reconstitution was followed by brief vortexing and then introduced into the LC-MS system for analysis.
Sampleprep Protocol Filename:Saxenda_Metabolite_Extraction.pdf

Combined analysis:

Analysis ID AN005010 AN005011
Analysis type MS MS
Chromatography type Reversed phase Reversed phase
Chromatography system Waters Acquity UPLC Waters Acquity UPLC
Column Waters XSelect HSS C18 (100 × 2.1mm,2.5um) Waters XSelect HSS C18 (100 × 2.1mm,2.5um)
MS Type ESI ESI
MS instrument type QTOF QTOF
MS instrument name Waters Xevo-G2-S Waters Xevo-G2-S
Ion Mode POSITIVE NEGATIVE
Units Area Area

Chromatography:

Chromatography ID:CH003784
Chromatography Summary:Waters Acquity UPLC system coupled with a Xevo G2-S QTOF mass spectrometer with an electrospray ionization source (ESI) was used to explore the metabolic profile. The extracted metabolites were separated using an ACQUITY UPLC using an XSelect column (100×2.1mm 2.5 μm) (Waters Ltd., Elstree, UK). Mobile phase solvent A was 0.1% formic acid in dH2O, while solvent B consisted of 0.1% formic acid in 50% ACN: MeOH. A gradient elution program was run: 0-16 min with 95-5% A, 16-19 min at 5% A, 19-20 min 5-95% A, and 20-22 min maintaining 5-95% A, all at a flow rate of 300 µL/min. MS spectra were obtained in both positive (ESI+) and negative (ESI-) electrospray ionization modes. The MS parameters were as follows: source temperature at 150°C, desolvation temperature at 500°C (ESI+) or 140°C (ESI-), capillary voltage at 3.20 kV (ESI+) or 3 kV (ESI-), cone voltage at 40 V, desolvation gas flow at 800.0 L/h, and cone gas flow at 50 L/h. Collision energies for low and high functions were set at off and 10 V to 50 V, respectively, in MSE mode. The mass spectrometer was calibrated using sodium formate in the 100–1200 Da range. Data were collected using Masslynx™ V4.1 workstation in continuum mode (Waters Inc., Milford, Massachusetts, USA).
Methods Filename:Saxenda_LC_MS.pdf
Instrument Name:Waters Acquity UPLC
Column Name:Waters XSelect HSS C18 (100 × 2.1mm,2.5um)
Column Temperature:55
Flow Gradient:0-16 min 95- 5% A, 16-19 min 5% A, 19-20 min 5-95% A, 20-22 min 95- 95% A
Flow Rate:300 µL/min
Solvent A:100% water; 0.1% formic acid
Solvent B:50% methanol/50% acetonitrile; 0.1% formic acid
Chromatography Type:Reversed phase

MS:

MS ID:MS004749
Analysis ID:AN005010
Instrument Name:Waters Xevo-G2-S
Instrument Type:QTOF
MS Type:ESI
MS Comments:The DIA data were collected with a Masslynx™ V4.1 workstation in continuum mode (Waters Inc., Milford, MA, USA). The raw MS data were processed following a standard pipeline using the Progenesis QI v.3.0 software.
Ion Mode:POSITIVE
Analysis Protocol File:Saxenda_LC_MS.pdf
  
MS ID:MS004750
Analysis ID:AN005011
Instrument Name:Waters Xevo-G2-S
Instrument Type:QTOF
MS Type:ESI
MS Comments:The DIA data were collected with a Masslynx™ V4.1 workstation in continuum mode (Waters Inc., Milford, MA, USA). The raw MS data were processed following a standard pipeline using the Progenesis QI v.3.0 software.
Ion Mode:NEGATIVE
Analysis Protocol File:Saxenda_LC_MS.pdf
  logo