Summary of Study ST004011

This data is available at the NIH Common Fund's National Metabolomics Data Repository (NMDR) website, the Metabolomics Workbench, https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org, where it has been assigned Project ID PR002506. The data can be accessed directly via it's Project DOI: 10.21228/M8QG1M This work is supported by NIH grant, U2C- DK119886.

See: https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/about/howtocite.php

This study contains a large results data set and is not available in the mwTab file. It is only available for download via FTP as data file(s) here.

Show all samples  |  Perform analysis on untargeted data  
Download mwTab file (text)   |  Download mwTab file(JSON)   |  Download data files (Contains raw data)
Study IDST004011
Study TitleMetabolic and Lipidomic Trade-offs in Helicoverpa armigera: Dynamics Under Plant Protease Inhibitor-Induced Stress-(study 2)
Study SummaryPlant protease inhibitors retard the growth and development of insects by inhibiting their digestive proteases. In response, insects try to adapt to these plant defensive molecules by modulating their protease expression. However, their survival mechanisms might not be limited only to digestive plasticity. To explore this, we performed a comprehensive lipidomics and metabolomics analysis in Helicoverpa armigera fed with a recombinant Capsicum annuum protease inhibitor (rCanPI-7) having unique four inhibitory repeat domains with potent activity against insect trypsins and chymotrypsins. These results revealed that H. armigera employs a dynamic and multifaceted physiological response to dietary stress induced by rCanPI. Upon ingestion of rCanPI-7, down regulation of glycolysis and TCA cycle indicated a decrease in primary energy metabolism while oxidative stress was evident from the depletion of reduced glutathione, peroxidation of membrane lipids, and accumulation of ceramides which are the hallmarks of mitochondrial dysfunction. Investigation of the dynamics in the turnover of different molecules hints that H. armigera activated multiple compensatory strategies such as mobilizing triglycerides and amino acid catabolism as an alternative source of energy, upregulation of antioxidants, membrane remodeling, activation of apoptosis, and shifts in neuromodulatory metabolites linked to cognitive adaptation. Collectively, these findings point to a tightly regulated physiological tug-of-war in H. armigera, where the damaging impact of rCanPI-induced oxidative and nutritional stress is counteracted by a suite of compensatory metabolic, structural, and neuromodulatory adjustments. To our knowledge, this is the first report of lipidomic profiling in H. armigera, providing novel insights into its biochemical resilience and identifying potential metabolic vulnerabilities for enhancing biopesticide strategies.
Institute
Translational Health Science And Technology Institute (THSTI)
Last NameKumar
First NameYashwant
AddressNCR Biotech Science Cluster,, Faridabad, Haryana, 121001, India
Emaily.kumar@thsti.res.in
Phone+911292876796
Submit Date2025-06-20
Raw Data AvailableYes
Raw Data File Type(s)mzML, raw(Thermo)
Analysis Type DetailLC-MS
Release Date2025-07-21
Release Version1
Yashwant Kumar Yashwant Kumar
https://dx.doi.org/10.21228/M8QG1M
ftp://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/Studies/ application/zip

Select appropriate tab below to view additional metadata details:


Project:

Project ID:PR002506
Project DOI:doi: 10.21228/M8QG1M
Project Title:Metabolic and Lipidomic Trade-offs in Helicoverpa armigera: Dynamics Under Plant Protease Inhibitor-Induced Stress
Project Type:Metabolomics
Project Summary:Plant protease inhibitors retard the growth and development of insects by inhibiting their digestive proteases. In response, insects try to adapt to these plant defensive molecules by modulating their protease expression. However, their survival mechanisms might not be limited only to digestive plasticity. To explore this, we performed a comprehensive lipidomics and metabolomics analysis in Helicoverpa armigera fed with a recombinant Capsicum annuum protease inhibitor (rCanPI-7) having unique four inhibitory repeat domains with potent activity against insect trypsins and chymotrypsins. These results revealed that H. armigera employs a dynamic and multifaceted physiological response to dietary stress induced by rCanPI. Upon ingestion of rCanPI-7, down regulation of glycolysis and TCA cycle indicated a decrease in primary energy metabolism while oxidative stress was evident from the depletion of reduced glutathione, peroxidation of membrane lipids, and accumulation of ceramides which are the hallmarks of mitochondrial dysfunction. Investigation of the dynamics in the turnover of different molecules hints that H. armigera activated multiple compensatory strategies such as mobilizing triglycerides and amino acid catabolism as an alternative source of energy, upregulation of antioxidants, membrane remodeling, activation of apoptosis, and shifts in neuromodulatory metabolites linked to cognitive adaptation. Collectively, these findings point to a tightly regulated physiological tug-of-war in H. armigera, where the damaging impact of rCanPI-induced oxidative and nutritional stress is counteracted by a suite of compensatory metabolic, structural, and neuromodulatory adjustments. To our knowledge, this is the first report of lipidomic profiling in H. armigera, providing novel insights into its biochemical resilience and identifying potential metabolic vulnerabilities for enhancing biopesticide strategies.
Institute:Translational Health Science And Technology Institute (THSTI)
Department:NCD
Laboratory:Biomarker lab
Last Name:Kumar
First Name:Yashwant
Address:NCR Biotech Science Cluster,, Faridabad, Haryana, 121001, India
Email:y.kumar@thsti.res.in
Phone:01292876796

Subject:

Subject ID:SU004149
Subject Type:Insect
Subject Species:Helicoverpa armigera
Taxonomy ID:29058

Factors:

Subject type: Insect; Subject species: Helicoverpa armigera (Factor headings shown in green)

mb_sample_id local_sample_id Sample source Treatment
SA461710EC_2Early Control
SA461711EC_1Early Control
SA461712EC_3Early Control
SA461713EI_1Early Fed
SA461714EI_2Early Fed
SA461715EI_3Early Fed
SA461716LC_1Late Control
SA461717LC_2Late Control
SA461718LC_3Late Control
SA461719LI_2Late Fed
SA461720LI_3Late Fed
SA461721LI_1Late Fed
SA461722MC_1Mid Control
SA461723MC_2Mid Control
SA461724MC_3Mid Control
SA461725MI_1Mid Fed
SA461726MI_2Mid Fed
SA461727MI_3Mid Fed
Showing results 1 to 18 of 18

Collection:

Collection ID:CO004142
Collection Summary:Experiment design and feeding assays were performed as per our previous study (Lomate et al., 2018). In brief, H. armigera larvae were maintained at optimal growth conditions in the laboratory with 27 ± 2°C, 60 ± 5% relative humidity and a photoperiod of 14 h light and 10 h dark. An artificial diet (AD) was prepared as per (Mahajan et al., 2013), and the PI diet was prepared by adding 150 μg of recombinant Capsicum annum protease inhibitor (rCanPI-7) to the artificial diet. Neonates were fed on artificial diet for 2 days, and then first instar larvae were transferred to the control artificial diet (AD-fed) and rCanPI-7 incorporated artificial diet (CanPI-fed) for 48 hours. Whole larvae were harvested at 0.5, 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h, each set containing 100 larvae. Pooled samples of 0.5, 2, and 6 h (early response), 12 and 24 h (mid response), and 48 h (late response) were studied using lipidomic and metabolomic studies. At each stage of bioassay, the harvested samples were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C until further use. Three biological replicates were used for both lipidomic and metabolomic study.
Sample Type:insect gut

Treatment:

Treatment ID:TR004158
Treatment Summary:NA

Sample Preparation:

Sampleprep ID:SP004155
Sampleprep Summary:Three biological replicates of AD-fed and rCanPI-fed insects of early, mid, and late response were used for lipid profiling. Total lipids were extracted using as (Matyash et al., 2008) with some modifications. Methanol (0.5 mL) was added to 25 mg of crushed tissue, followed by thorough vortexing for 30 s. Next, 1.25 mL of methyl-tert-butyl ether was added, and the mixture was incubated for 1h on a shaker at room temperature (~25°C). Later, 0.3 mL MS-grade water was added to introduce phase separation, followed by incubation at 25°C for 10 min. Samples were then centrifuged at 400 rpm and 10°C for 5 min. The upper organic phase was collected and dried using a SpeedVac concentrator. Samples were stored at −80 °C till further use. Before running on LC-MS/MS, the extract was re-suspended in 100 μL of a 65:30:5 (acetonitrile: 2-propanol: water, v/v/v) solution.

Chromatography:

Chromatography ID:CH005025
Chromatography Summary:solvent A consisted of a 2:3 v/v ratio of water to acetonitrile, and solvent B was a 9:1 v/v ratio of propanol to acetonitrile, both containing 10mM ammonium formate and 0.1% formic acid. Temperature of the column was at 40°C and a constant solvent flow rate of 0.3 mL/min was maintained.
Instrument Name:Thermo Dionex Ultimate 3000 RS
Column Name:Waters ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 (100 x 2.1mm,1.8um)
Column Temperature:40°C
Flow Gradient:A gradient elution method was employed for an 18-min period, where solvent B increased from 30 to 97% over the first 0 to 12 min, followed by a 3 min hold, then, solvent B was returned to 30% from 15.2 to 18 min.
Flow Rate:300 μL/min
Solvent A:40% Water/60% Acetonitrile; 10mM Ammonium formate; 0.1% Formic acid
Solvent B:90% Propanol/10% Acetonitrile; 10mM Ammonium formate; 0.1% Formic acid
Chromatography Type:Reversed phase
  
Chromatography ID:CH005026
Chromatography Summary:solvent A consisted of a 2:3 v/v ratio of water to acetonitrile, and solvent B was a 9:1 v/v ratio of propanol to acetonitrile, both containing 10mM ammonium formate and 0.1% formic acid. Temperature of the column was at 40°C and a constant solvent flow rate of 0.3 mL/min was maintained.
Instrument Name:Thermo Dionex Ultimate 3000 RS
Column Name:Waters ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 (100 x 2.1mm,1.8um)
Column Temperature:40°C
Flow Gradient:A gradient elution method was employed for an 18-min period, where solvent B increased from 30 to 97% over the first 0 to 12 min, followed by a 3 min hold, then, solvent B was returned to 30% from 15.2 to 18 min.
Flow Rate:300 μL/min
Solvent A:40% Water/60% Acetonitrile; 10mM Ammonium formate; 0.1% Formic acid
Solvent B:90% Propanol/10% Acetonitrile; 10mM Ammonium formate; 0.1% Formic acid
Chromatography Type:Reversed phase

Analysis:

Analysis ID:AN006615
Analysis Type:MS
Chromatography ID:CH005025
Has Mz:1
Has Rt:1
Rt Units:Seconds
Results File:ST004011_AN006615_Results.txt
Units:relative intensity
  
Analysis ID:AN006616
Analysis Type:MS
Chromatography ID:CH005026
Has Mz:1
Has Rt:1
Rt Units:Seconds
Results File:ST004011_AN006616_Results.txt
Units:relative intensity
  logo