Return to study ST000049 main page

MB Sample ID: SA002148

Local Sample ID:Heat_Treated_02
Subject ID:SU000067
Subject Type:Insect
Subject Species:Centroptilum triangulifer;Atherix;Megaloptera
Taxonomy ID:2078957;124299;50553
Species Group:Insect

Select appropriate tab below to view additional metadata details:


Subject:

Subject ID:SU000067
Subject Type:Insect
Subject Species:Centroptilum triangulifer;Atherix;Megaloptera
Taxonomy ID:2078957;124299;50553
Species Group:Insect

Factors:

Local Sample IDMB Sample IDFactor Level IDLevel ValueFactor Name
Heat_Treated_02SA002148FL000657Mayflyspecies
Heat_Treated_02SA002148FL000657Mayfly Heat TreatedTreatment
Heat_Treated_02SA002148FL000657no wing padswing pads

Collection:

Collection ID:CO000050
Collection Summary:whole insects were collected
Collection Protocol Comments:Original culture material was obtained from the Stroud Water Research Center (Avondale, PA). Larvae were reared at 22°C and fed a periphytic diet. When larvae reached a suitable size, they were separated from their food source for 12 hours to evacuate gut contents. Larvae were then divided into two treatment groups – a control group maintained at the culturing temperature of 22°C, and a thermal challenge group. The thermal challenge group was subjected to a temperature increase at a rate of 1°C per hour. This rate of temperature change is commonly observed in temperate streams. When the treatment temperature reached 30°C, larvae from both control and treatment groups were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen in groups of 12-13 larvae. Each grouping of 12-13 larvae comprised a composite replicate for the metabolic profiling analysis. A total of 3 replicates each for the control and thermal treatments were used in this study. Some larvae had developed dark wing pads during the experiment. This is a signal that the larvae were very close to emerging from the aquatic larval phase to a winged sub-adult phase. Enough of these larvae were present in the control treatment to be removed from the control cohort and considered as an independent sample.
Sample Type:whole insect
Volumeoramount Collected:50 mg
Storage Conditions:-80C

Treatment:

Treatment ID:TR000068
Treatment Summary:Metabolomics profile of mayfly larvae exposed to heat
Treatment Protocol Comments:Heat Treated | Control | ControlX
Treatment:Abiotic
Animal Acclimation Duration:exposed to heat (22C to 30C ramp); fasted for 8 hours | control (fasted for 8 hours) | control (fasted for 6 hours)

Sample Preparation:

Sampleprep ID:SP000063
Sampleprep Summary:Control and heat-treated mayfly samples were provided in triplicate and were processed individually. One sample was provided for AD, ControlX, MF control (from a previous study) and MG larvae. Three replicates of the larvae listed above having only a single sample were created. Aliquots of 50-300mg of insect larvae were mixed with degassed 1:1 Acetonitrile:Water solution in a 2 mL snap cap tube at a concentration of 50 mg/mL. Megalopterans were substantially larger than the other larvae and were prepared at 200 mg/mL. Samples were homogenized and then centrifuged at 4?C for 5 minutes at 14000rcf. The supernatant was removed and placed into a new tube. Samples were centrifuged again at 4?C for 5 minutes at 14000rcf and a volume of the homogenate corresponding to 40 mg insect larvae were taken. After homogenization, the three larval replicates from AD, ControlX, MG and MF control (from a previous study) were pooled and a single sample created for each larval type. There was insufficient Mayfly (heat and control) sample material to create an internal pool, so an external pool was made by combining equal concentration amounts of AD, MG and MF control (from a previous study) pool quality check (QC) samples. Samples were completely dried by vacuum centrifuge and were reconstituted by adding 630 µL of D2O (Aldrich) and 70 µL of Chenomx ISTD solution (Chenomx, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada). The samples were vortexed and centrifuged at 14000rcf for 2 minutes. 650 µL of sample was transferred into 5mm NMR tubes and analyzed by NMR.
Sampleprep Protocol Filename:RTI_Metabolomic_Analysis_of_Thermally_Challenged_Larvae_Procedure.docx
Processing Method:Homogenization and Solvent Removal with SpeedVac
Processing Storage Conditions:4°C
Extraction Method:50% Aqueous Acetonitrile
Extract Concentration Dilution:dried on SpeedVac
Extract Storage:-80C
Sample Resuspension:resuspended in D2O + Chenomx ISTD solution

Analysis:

MB Sample ID:SA002148
Analysis ID:AN000085
Laboratory Name:DHMRI
Analysis Type:NMR
Acquisition Date:41624
Software Version:TopSpin 3.0
Operator Name:Kevin Knagge, Wimal Pathmasiri
Randomization Order:Yes
Detector Type:NMR
Data Format:Bruker
Chromatography ID:CH000054
Num Factors:7

NMR:

NMR ID:NM000022
Analysis ID:AN000085
Instrument Name:Bruker Avance III
Instrument Type:FT-NMR
NMR Experiment Type:1D 1H
Field Frequency Lock:D20
Standard Concentration:0.5 mM
Spectrometer Frequency:950 MHz
NMR Probe:5mm Cryogenically Cooled ATMA
NMR Solvent:D20
NMR Tube Size:5mm
Shimming Method:Topshim (Gradient)
Pulse Sequence:noesypr1d
Water Suppression:yes
Pulse Width:8.68
Power Level:12.589W
Receiver Gain:4
Offset Frequency:4468.30 Hz
Chemical Shift Ref Cpd:DSS
Temperature:298 K
Number Of Scans:256
Dummy Scans:4
Acquisition Time:1.73 sec
Relaxation Delay:2s
Spectral Width:18939.395 Hz
Num Data Points Acquired:65536
Real Data Points:65536
Line Broadening:0.5
Zero Filling:Yes
Apodization:Lorentzian
Baseline Correction Method:Polynomial
Chemical Shift Ref Std:DSS
  logo