Return to study ST001491 main page

MB Sample ID: SA125821

Local Sample ID:25
Subject ID:SU001565
Subject Type:Human
Subject Species:Homo sapiens
Taxonomy ID:9606
Gender:Female

Select appropriate tab below to view additional metadata details:


Combined analysis:

Analysis ID AN002470 AN002471 AN002472 AN002473
Analysis type MS MS MS MS
Chromatography type HILIC HILIC Reversed phase Reversed phase
Chromatography system Thermo Dionex Ultimate 3000 RS Thermo Dionex Ultimate 3000 RS Thermo Dionex Ultimate 3000 RS Thermo Dionex Ultimate 3000 RS
Column SeQuant ZIC-HILIC (100 x 2.1mm,3.5um) SeQuant ZIC-HILIC (100 x 2.1mm,3.5um) Hypersil GOLD (150 x 2.1mm,1.9um) Hypersil GOLD (150 x 2.1mm,1.9um)
MS Type ESI ESI ESI ESI
MS instrument type Orbitrap Orbitrap Orbitrap Orbitrap
MS instrument name Thermo Q Exactive HF hybrid Orbitrap Thermo Q Exactive HF hybrid Orbitrap Thermo Q Exactive HF hybrid Orbitrap Thermo Q Exactive HF hybrid Orbitrap
Ion Mode POSITIVE NEGATIVE POSITIVE NEGATIVE
Units MS count MS Counts MS Counts MS Counts

MS:

MS ID:MS002290
Analysis ID:AN002470
Instrument Name:Thermo Q Exactive HF hybrid Orbitrap
Instrument Type:Orbitrap
MS Type:ESI
MS Comments:Data processing. Data from each mode were independently analyzed using Progenesis QI software (v2.3) (Nonlinear Dynamics). Metabolic features from blanks and that did not show sufficient linearity upon dilution in QC samples (r < 0.6) were discarded. Only metabolic features present in > 2/3 of the samples were kept for further analysis. Inter- and intra-batch variations were corrected by applying locally estimated scatterplot smoothing local regression (LOESS) on pooled samples injected repetitively along the batches (span = 0.75). Data were acquired in four batches for HILIC and RPLC modes. Dilution effects were corrected using probabilistic quotient normalization (PQN) (Rosen Vollmar et al., 2019). Missing values were imputed by drawing from a random distribution of low values in the corresponding sample. Data from each mode were then merged, producing a dataset containing 6,630 metabolic features. Metabolite abundances were reported as spectral counts. Metabolic feature annotation. Peak annotation was first performed by matching experimental m/z, retention time and MS/MS spectra to an in-house library of analytical-grade standards. Remaining peaks were identified by matching experimental m/z and fragmentation spectra to publicly available databases including HMDB (http://www.hmdb.ca/), MoNA (http://mona.fiehnlab.ucdavis.edu/) and MassBank (http://www.massbank.jp/) using the R package ‘MetID’ (v0.2.0) (Shen et al., 2019). Briefly, metabolic feature tables from Progenesis QI were matched to fragmentation spectra with a m/z and a retention time window of ± 15 ppm and ± 30 s (HILIC) and ± 20 s (RPLC), respectively. When multiple MS/MS spectra match a single metabolic feature, all matched MS/MS spectra were used for the identification. Next, MS1 and MS2 pairs were searched against public databases and a similarity score was calculated using the forward dot–product algorithm which considers both fragments and intensities (Stein and Scott, 1994). Metabolites were reported if the similarity score was above 0.4. Spectra from metabolic features of interest important in random forest models (see below) were further investigated manually to confirm identification.
Ion Mode:POSITIVE
Capillary Temperature:375C
Capillary Voltage:3.4kV
Collision Energy:25 & 35 NCE
Collision Gas:N2
Dry Gas Temp:310C
  
MS ID:MS002291
Analysis ID:AN002471
Instrument Name:Thermo Q Exactive HF hybrid Orbitrap
Instrument Type:Orbitrap
MS Type:ESI
MS Comments:Data processing. Data from each mode were independently analyzed using Progenesis QI software (v2.3) (Nonlinear Dynamics). Metabolic features from blanks and that did not show sufficient linearity upon dilution in QC samples (r < 0.6) were discarded. Only metabolic features present in > 2/3 of the samples were kept for further analysis. Inter- and intra-batch variations were corrected by applying locally estimated scatterplot smoothing local regression (LOESS) on pooled samples injected repetitively along the batches (span = 0.75). Data were acquired in four batches for HILIC and RPLC modes. Dilution effects were corrected using probabilistic quotient normalization (PQN) (Rosen Vollmar et al., 2019). Missing values were imputed by drawing from a random distribution of low values in the corresponding sample. Data from each mode were then merged, producing a dataset containing 6,630 metabolic features. Metabolite abundances were reported as spectral counts. Metabolic feature annotation. Peak annotation was first performed by matching experimental m/z, retention time and MS/MS spectra to an in-house library of analytical-grade standards. Remaining peaks were identified by matching experimental m/z and fragmentation spectra to publicly available databases including HMDB (http://www.hmdb.ca/), MoNA (http://mona.fiehnlab.ucdavis.edu/) and MassBank (http://www.massbank.jp/) using the R package ‘MetID’ (v0.2.0) (Shen et al., 2019). Briefly, metabolic feature tables from Progenesis QI were matched to fragmentation spectra with a m/z and a retention time window of ± 15 ppm and ± 30 s (HILIC) and ± 20 s (RPLC), respectively. When multiple MS/MS spectra match a single metabolic feature, all matched MS/MS spectra were used for the identification. Next, MS1 and MS2 pairs were searched against public databases and a similarity score was calculated using the forward dot–product algorithm which considers both fragments and intensities (Stein and Scott, 1994). Metabolites were reported if the similarity score was above 0.4. Spectra from metabolic features of interest important in random forest models (see below) were further investigated manually to confirm identification.
Ion Mode:NEGATIVE
Capillary Temperature:375C
Capillary Voltage:3.4kV
Collision Energy:25 & 35 NCE
Collision Gas:N2
Dry Gas Temp:310C
  
MS ID:MS002292
Analysis ID:AN002472
Instrument Name:Thermo Q Exactive HF hybrid Orbitrap
Instrument Type:Orbitrap
MS Type:ESI
MS Comments:Data processing. Data from each mode were independently analyzed using Progenesis QI software (v2.3) (Nonlinear Dynamics). Metabolic features from blanks and that did not show sufficient linearity upon dilution in QC samples (r < 0.6) were discarded. Only metabolic features present in > 2/3 of the samples were kept for further analysis. Inter- and intra-batch variations were corrected by applying locally estimated scatterplot smoothing local regression (LOESS) on pooled samples injected repetitively along the batches (span = 0.75). Data were acquired in four batches for HILIC and RPLC modes. Dilution effects were corrected using probabilistic quotient normalization (PQN) (Rosen Vollmar et al., 2019). Missing values were imputed by drawing from a random distribution of low values in the corresponding sample. Data from each mode were then merged, producing a dataset containing 6,630 metabolic features. Metabolite abundances were reported as spectral counts. Metabolic feature annotation. Peak annotation was first performed by matching experimental m/z, retention time and MS/MS spectra to an in-house library of analytical-grade standards. Remaining peaks were identified by matching experimental m/z and fragmentation spectra to publicly available databases including HMDB (http://www.hmdb.ca/), MoNA (http://mona.fiehnlab.ucdavis.edu/) and MassBank (http://www.massbank.jp/) using the R package ‘MetID’ (v0.2.0) (Shen et al., 2019). Briefly, metabolic feature tables from Progenesis QI were matched to fragmentation spectra with a m/z and a retention time window of ± 15 ppm and ± 30 s (HILIC) and ± 20 s (RPLC), respectively. When multiple MS/MS spectra match a single metabolic feature, all matched MS/MS spectra were used for the identification. Next, MS1 and MS2 pairs were searched against public databases and a similarity score was calculated using the forward dot–product algorithm which considers both fragments and intensities (Stein and Scott, 1994). Metabolites were reported if the similarity score was above 0.4. Spectra from metabolic features of interest important in random forest models (see below) were further investigated manually to confirm identification.
Ion Mode:POSITIVE
Capillary Temperature:375C
Capillary Voltage:3.4kV
Collision Energy:25 & 50 NCE
Collision Gas:N2
Dry Gas Temp:310C
  
MS ID:MS002293
Analysis ID:AN002473
Instrument Name:Thermo Q Exactive HF hybrid Orbitrap
Instrument Type:Orbitrap
MS Type:ESI
MS Comments:Data processing. Data from each mode were independently analyzed using Progenesis QI software (v2.3) (Nonlinear Dynamics). Metabolic features from blanks and that did not show sufficient linearity upon dilution in QC samples (r < 0.6) were discarded. Only metabolic features present in > 2/3 of the samples were kept for further analysis. Inter- and intra-batch variations were corrected by applying locally estimated scatterplot smoothing local regression (LOESS) on pooled samples injected repetitively along the batches (span = 0.75). Data were acquired in four batches for HILIC and RPLC modes. Dilution effects were corrected using probabilistic quotient normalization (PQN) (Rosen Vollmar et al., 2019). Missing values were imputed by drawing from a random distribution of low values in the corresponding sample. Data from each mode were then merged, producing a dataset containing 6,630 metabolic features. Metabolite abundances were reported as spectral counts. Metabolic feature annotation. Peak annotation was first performed by matching experimental m/z, retention time and MS/MS spectra to an in-house library of analytical-grade standards. Remaining peaks were identified by matching experimental m/z and fragmentation spectra to publicly available databases including HMDB (http://www.hmdb.ca/), MoNA (http://mona.fiehnlab.ucdavis.edu/) and MassBank (http://www.massbank.jp/) using the R package ‘MetID’ (v0.2.0) (Shen et al., 2019). Briefly, metabolic feature tables from Progenesis QI were matched to fragmentation spectra with a m/z and a retention time window of ± 15 ppm and ± 30 s (HILIC) and ± 20 s (RPLC), respectively. When multiple MS/MS spectra match a single metabolic feature, all matched MS/MS spectra were used for the identification. Next, MS1 and MS2 pairs were searched against public databases and a similarity score was calculated using the forward dot–product algorithm which considers both fragments and intensities (Stein and Scott, 1994). Metabolites were reported if the similarity score was above 0.4. Spectra from metabolic features of interest important in random forest models (see below) were further investigated manually to confirm identification.
Ion Mode:NEGATIVE
Capillary Temperature:375C
Capillary Voltage:3.4kV
Collision Energy:25 & 50 NCE
Collision Gas:N2
Dry Gas Temp:310C
  logo