Summary of Study ST002430

This data is available at the NIH Common Fund's National Metabolomics Data Repository (NMDR) website, the Metabolomics Workbench, https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org, where it has been assigned Project ID PR001563. The data can be accessed directly via it's Project DOI: 10.21228/M8NX4M This work is supported by NIH grant, U2C- DK119886.

See: https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/about/howtocite.php

This study contains a large results data set and is not available in the mwTab file. It is only available for download via FTP as data file(s) here.

Show all samples  |  Perform analysis on untargeted data  
Download mwTab file (text)   |  Download mwTab file(JSON)   |  Download data files (Contains raw data)
Study IDST002430
Study TitleInsights from a Multi-Omics Integration (MOI) Study in Oil Palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) Response to Abiotic Stresses: Part Two—Drought
Study TypeMulti-Omics Integration (MOI) Study
Study SummaryDrought and salinity are two of the most severe abiotic stresses affecting agriculture Worldwide and bear some similarities in the response of plants to them. The first is also known as osmotic stress and shows similarities mainly with the osmotic effect, the first phase of salinity stress. Multi-Omics Integration (MOI) offers a new opportunity for the non-trivial challenge of unraveling the mechanisms behind multigenic traits, such as drought and salinity resistance. The current study carried out a comprehensive, large-scale, single-omics analysis (SOA) and MOI studies on the leaves of young oil palm plants submitted to water deprivation. After performing SOA, 1,955 DE enzymes from transcriptomics analysis, 131 DE enzymes from proteomics analysis, and 269 DE metabolites underwent MOI analysis, revealing several pathways affected by this stress, with at least one DE molecule in all three omics platforms used. Besides, the similarities and dissimilarities in the molecular response of those plants to those two abiotic stresses underwent mapping. Cysteine and methionine metabolism (map00270) was the most affected pathway in all scenarios evaluated. The correlation analysis revealed that 91.55% of those enzymes expressed under both stresses had similar qualitative profiles, corroborating the already known fact that plant responses to drought and salinity show several similarities. At last, the results shed light on some candidate genes for engineering crop species resilient to both abiotic stresses.
Institute
The Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa)
DepartmentEmbrapa Agroenergy
LaboratoryGenetics and Plant Biotechnology
Last NameSouza Jr
First NameManoel Teixeira
AddressParque Estacao Biologica, Final Avenida W3 Norte - Asa Norte, Brasilia, Distrito Federal, 70770901, Brazil
Emailmanoel.souza@embrapa.br
Phone+55.61.3448.3210
Submit Date2022-09-28
Publicationshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97835-x
Raw Data AvailableYes
Raw Data File Type(s)mzXML
Analysis Type DetailLC-MS
Release Date2023-01-20
Release Version1
Manoel Teixeira Souza Jr Manoel Teixeira Souza Jr
https://dx.doi.org/10.21228/M8NX4M
ftp://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/Studies/ application/zip

Select appropriate tab below to view additional metadata details:


Combined analysis:

Analysis ID AN003955 AN003956
Analysis type MS MS
Chromatography type Reversed phase Reversed phase
Chromatography system Shimadzu Nexera X2 Shimadzu Nexera X2
Column Waters Acquity BEH C18 (150 x 2mm, 1.7um) Waters Acquity BEH C18 (150 x 2mm, 1.7um)
MS Type ESI ESI
MS instrument type QTOF QTOF
MS instrument name Bruker maXis Impact qTOF Bruker maXis Impact qTOF
Ion Mode POSITIVE NEGATIVE
Units Peak intensity Peak intensity

MS:

MS ID:MS003690
Analysis ID:AN003955
Instrument Name:Bruker maXis Impact qTOF
Instrument Type:QTOF
MS Type:ESI
MS Comments:High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) was performed in a MaXis 4G Q-TOF MS system (Bruker Daltonics, Germany) using an electrospray source in the positive and negative ion modes (ESI(+)–MS and ESI(−)–MS). The MS instrument settings used were: endplate offset, 500 V; capillary voltage, 3800 V; nebulizer pressure, 4 bar; dry gas flow, 9 L/min, dry temperature, 200 °C; and column temperature, 40 °C. The acquisition spectra rate was 3.00 Hz, monitoring a mass range from 70 to 1200 m/z. Sodium formate solution (10 mM NaOH solution in 50/50 v/v isopropanol/water containing 0.2% formic acid) was directly injected through a 6-port valve at the beginning of each chromatographic run to external calibration. UHPLC–MS data was acquired by the HyStar Application version 3.2 (Bruker Daltonics, Germany), and data processing was done using Data Analysis 4.2 (Bruker Daltonics, Germany).
Ion Mode:POSITIVE
  
MS ID:MS003691
Analysis ID:AN003956
Instrument Name:Bruker maXis Impact qTOF
Instrument Type:QTOF
MS Type:ESI
MS Comments:High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) was performed in a MaXis 4G Q-TOF MS system (Bruker Daltonics, Germany) using an electrospray source in the positive and negative ion modes (ESI(+)–MS and ESI(−)–MS). The MS instrument settings used were: endplate offset, 500 V; capillary voltage, 3800 V; nebulizer pressure, 4 bar; dry gas flow, 9 L/min, dry temperature, 200 °C; and column temperature, 40 °C. The acquisition spectra rate was 3.00 Hz, monitoring a mass range from 70 to 1200 m/z. Sodium formate solution (10 mM NaOH solution in 50/50 v/v isopropanol/water containing 0.2% formic acid) was directly injected through a 6-port valve at the beginning of each chromatographic run to external calibration. UHPLC–MS data was acquired by the HyStar Application version 3.2 (Bruker Daltonics, Germany), and data processing was done using Data Analysis 4.2 (Bruker Daltonics, Germany).
Ion Mode:NEGATIVE
  logo