Summary of Study ST001801

This data is available at the NIH Common Fund's National Metabolomics Data Repository (NMDR) website, the Metabolomics Workbench, https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org, where it has been assigned Project ID PR001136. The data can be accessed directly via it's Project DOI: 10.21228/M8VQ4D This work is supported by NIH grant, U2C- DK119886.

See: https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/about/howtocite.php

This study contains a large results data set and is not available in the mwTab file. It is only available for download via FTP as data file(s) here.

Show all samples  
Download mwTab file (text)   |  Download mwTab file(JSON)   |  Download data files (Contains raw data)
Study IDST001801
Study TitleCHDWB human plasma exposomics analysis - 1
Study TypeUntargeted MS anlaysis
Study SummaryWe analyzed 80 archival samples from individuals (57 females, 23 males; aged 41 to 68 y) without known disease or occupational or environmental exposures of concern as a pilot to test the utility of XLE in large-scale human biomonitoring studies. Using a requirement for at least 3 co-eluting accurate mass m/z features ( 5 ppm) within 30 s of database retention time, we identified 49 chemicals belonging to various environmental chemical classes. An unsupervised 2-way hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) of log transformed intensity showed clustering according to chemical class. In particular, persistent chemicals were highly correlated with each other (all raw P < 0.001), including p,p’-DDE, PCBs 153, 180, 138, 118 and 74, PBDE-47, hexachlorobenzene (HCB) and trans-nonachlor. Results showed a general increase of chemical levels with increasing age quartiles (Q3 and Q4 : 53 to 68 versus Q1 and Q2: 41 to 52) using unsupervised clustering, a trend particularly evident for the cluster of p,p’-DDE, PCBs 153, 180, 138, 118 and 74, PBDE-47, HCB and trans-nonachlor. Examination of data according to body mass index (BMI) showed that individuals with BMI ≥ 40 had lower levels of environmental chemicals, which may be attributed to high lipophilicity and propensity to distribute in adipose tissue versus plasma. Quantification with reference standardization showed that use of two SRM samples with differing environmental chemical concentrations can overcome variable batch effects in quantification for large-scale studies. Examples of the most frequently detected chemicals shows that overall distributions were positively skewed by a small subset of individuals with high concentrations.
Institute
Emory University
DepartmentMedicine/Pulmonary
LaboratoryDean Jones
Last NameHu
First NameXin
AddressEmory University Whitehead building (Rm 225), 615 Michael Street
Emailxin.hu2@emory.edu
Phone4047275091
Submit Date2021-05-06
Raw Data AvailableYes
Raw Data File Type(s)mzXML
Analysis Type DetailGC-MS
Release Date2021-05-28
Release Version1
Xin Hu Xin Hu
https://dx.doi.org/10.21228/M8VQ4D
ftp://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/Studies/ application/zip

Select appropriate tab below to view additional metadata details:


Treatment:

Treatment ID:TR001891
Treatment Summary:50 µL formic acid (Emprove® Essential DAC, Sigma-Aldrich) was added to 200 µL SRM aliquots and immediately followed by addition of 200 µL hexane – ethyl acetate (2:1 v/v, ≥99% pure, Sigma-Aldrich) containing the internal standards (final concentration: 1 ng/mL). The sample mixture was shaken vigorously on ice using multi-tube vortexer (VWR VX-2500) for 1 h and centrifuged at 1000 g, 4 °C for 10 min. The sample mixture was chilled during entire extraction procedure. The organic supernatant was transferred to a new tube with 25 mg MgSO4 (≥99.99% pure, Sigma-Aldrich) and vortexed vigorously to remove water. After 10 min centrifugation at 1000 g, 80 µL of the final supernatant was spiked with instrumental internal standards (final concentration: 1 ng/mL) for analysis. Two 13C labeled chemicals [13C12]PCB-28 and [13C12]PBB-153 were used as volumetric internal standards added to the final extract, and nine 13C labeled chemicals (99% isotope enrichment for each) were spiked as recovery standards to estimate chemical recovery efficiency by XLE: [13C12]PCB-101, [13C12]PCB-153, [13C12]PCB-180, [13C12]PBDE-47, [13C12]PBDE-99, [13C6]anthracene, [13C10]mirex, [13C6]cis-permethrin, and [13C12]p,p’-DDE.
  logo