Summary of Study ST003380
This data is available at the NIH Common Fund's National Metabolomics Data Repository (NMDR) website, the Metabolomics Workbench, https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org, where it has been assigned Project ID PR002096. The data can be accessed directly via it's Project DOI: 10.21228/M8PJ8N This work is supported by NIH grant, U2C- DK119886.
See: https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/about/howtocite.php
This study contains a large results data set and is not available in the mwTab file. It is only available for download via FTP as data file(s) here.
Study ID | ST003380 |
Study Title | Deletion of Kcnj16 altered transcriptomic and metabolomic profiles of Dahl salt-sensitive rats |
Study Type | Untargeted metabolomis |
Study Summary | The inwardly rectifying K+ Channel Kir5.1 (Kcnj16) is essential in renal salt handling and blood pressure control. However, the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. Here, we integrated transcriptomics and metabolomics to comprehensively profile the changes in genes and metabolites in the Dahl salt-sensitive (SS) rat lacking Kcnj16 to identify potential mechanisms. Consistent with the phenotype of knock-out (KO) rats, the transcriptomic profile predicted reduced blood pressure, kidney damage, and increased ion transport. Canonical pathway analysis suggested activation of metabolic-related while suppression of immune responses-related pathways in KO rats. Untargeted metabolomic analysis revealed different metabolic profiles between WT and KO rats. Integration of transcriptomic and metabolomic profiles suggested altered tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, amino acid, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) metabolism that are related to SS hypertension. In conclusion, besides increased ion transport, our data suggest suppressed immune responses-related and altered metabolic-related pathways of SS rats lacking Kir5.1. |
Institute | University of South Florida |
Department | Molecular Pharmacology and Physiology |
Laboratory | Alexander Staruschenko |
Last Name | Xu |
First Name | Biyang |
Address | 560 channelside drive Tampa FL 33602 |
bxu@usf.edu | |
Phone | 3322014356 |
Submit Date | 2024-07-31 |
Num Groups | 2 |
Total Subjects | 11 |
Num Males | 11 |
Raw Data Available | Yes |
Raw Data File Type(s) | d |
Analysis Type Detail | LC-MS |
Release Date | 2024-08-08 |
Release Version | 1 |
Select appropriate tab below to view additional metadata details:
Project:
Project ID: | PR002096 |
Project DOI: | doi: 10.21228/M8PJ8N |
Project Title: | Deletion of Kcnj16 altered transcriptomic and metabolomic profiles of Dahl salt-sensitive rats |
Project Type: | Untargeted metabolomic analysis |
Project Summary: | The objective of the project was to compare the metabolomic profiles in the kidney, urine and plasma of SSWT and SSKcnj16-/- rats. Untargeted metabolomic analysis revealed different metabolic profiles between SSWT and SSKcnj16-/- rats, with 219, 790, and 31 differentially expressed metabolites in plasma, urine, and kidney in SSKcnj16-/- rats compared to SSWT rats. |
Institute: | University of South Florida |
Department: | Molecular Pharmacology and Physiology |
Laboratory: | Alexander Staruschenko |
Last Name: | Xu |
First Name: | Biyang |
Address: | 560 channelside drive, Tampa, FLORIDA, 33602, USA |
Email: | bxu@usf.edu |
Phone: | (332) 201-4356 |
Subject:
Subject ID: | SU003501 |
Subject Type: | Mammal |
Subject Species: | Rattus norvegicus |
Taxonomy ID: | 10116 |
Gender: | Male |
Factors:
Subject type: Mammal; Subject species: Rattus norvegicus (Factor headings shown in green)
mb_sample_id | local_sample_id | Sample source | Genotype |
---|---|---|---|
SA367303 | s.9052.24 | kidney cortex | control |
SA367304 | s.9052.26 | kidney cortex | control |
SA367305 | s.9052.27 | kidney cortex | control |
SA367306 | s.9052.31 | kidney cortex | control |
SA367307 | s.9052.32 | kidney cortex | control |
SA367297 | s.9052.25 | kidney cortex | KO |
SA367298 | s.9052.33 | kidney cortex | KO |
SA367299 | s.9052.30 | kidney cortex | KO |
SA367300 | s.9052.29 | kidney cortex | KO |
SA367301 | s.9052.28 | kidney cortex | KO |
SA367302 | s.9052.23 | kidney cortex | KO |
SA367314 | s.9052.06 | plasma | control |
SA367315 | s.9052.03 | plasma | control |
SA367316 | s.9052.07 | plasma | control |
SA367317 | s.9052.10 | plasma | control |
SA367318 | s.9052.01 | plasma | control |
SA367308 | s.9052.05 | plasma | KO |
SA367309 | s.9052.04 | plasma | KO |
SA367310 | s.9052.11 | plasma | KO |
SA367311 | s.9052.02 | plasma | KO |
SA367312 | s.9052.08 | plasma | KO |
SA367313 | s.9052.09 | plasma | KO |
SA367292 | s.9052.22 | Urine | control |
SA367293 | s.9052.21 | Urine | control |
SA367294 | s.9052.15 | Urine | control |
SA367295 | s.9052.18 | Urine | control |
SA367296 | s.9052.12 | Urine | control |
SA367286 | s.9052.13 | Urine | KO |
SA367287 | s.9052.20 | Urine | KO |
SA367288 | s.9052.19 | Urine | KO |
SA367289 | s.9052.17 | Urine | KO |
SA367290 | s.9052.16 | Urine | KO |
SA367291 | s.9052.14 | Urine | KO |
Showing results 1 to 33 of 33 |
Collection:
Collection ID: | CO003494 |
Collection Summary: | Flash frozen kidney tissue, urine and plasma from arterial blood were collected |
Sample Type: | urine, plasma, kidney cortex |
Treatment:
Treatment ID: | TR003510 |
Treatment Summary: | NA |
Sample Preparation:
Sampleprep ID: | SP003508 |
Sampleprep Summary: | Kidney: 10 uL/mg 1X PBS was added to the pulverized kidney tissue followed by vortexing to form homogenous mixture. 50 uL of homogenate was used. 500 ng Ring 13C6-Phe IS (internal standard) were added to all samples and sonicated in ice bath for 30 seconds x 4 times. 300 uL 50x50 MeOH: ACN mixture were then added and incubated on ice for 30 min with occasional vortexing (every 10 min). The mixture were then centrifuged at 18,000 g for 20 min at 4oC, and dry under N2 stream on cold blocks. Urine: 50 uL urine sample was used. 500 ng Ring 13C6-Phe IS (internal standard) were added to all samples and sonicated in ice bath for 30 seconds x 4 times. 300 uL 50x50 MeOH: ACN mixture were then added and incubated on ice for 30 min with occasional vortexing (every 10 min). The mixture were then centrifuged at 18,000 g for 20 min at 4oC, and dry under N2 stream on cold blocks. Plasma: 25 uL of plasma was used. 500 ng Ring 13C6-Phe IS (internal standard) were added to all samples and sonicated in ice bath for 30 seconds x 4 times. 150 uL 50x50 MeOH: ACN mixture were then added and incubated on ice for 30 min with occasional vortexing (every 10 min). The mixture were then centrifuged at 18,000 g for 20 min at 4oC, and dry under N2 stream on cold blocks. |
Combined analysis:
Analysis ID | AN005535 | AN005536 | AN005537 | AN005538 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Analysis type | MS | MS | MS | MS |
Chromatography type | HILIC | HILIC | Reversed phase | Reversed phase |
Chromatography system | Agilent 1290 Infinity | Agilent 1290 Infinity | Agilent 1290 | Agilent 1290 |
Column | Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH HILIC (150 x 2.1mm,1.7um) | Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH HILIC (150 x 2.1mm,1.7um) | Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 (150 x 2.1mm, 1.8um) | Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 (150 x 2.1mm, 1.8um) |
MS Type | ESI | ESI | ESI | ESI |
MS instrument type | QTOF | QTOF | QTOF | QTOF |
MS instrument name | Agilent 6550 QTOF | Agilent 6550 QTOF | Agilent 6550 QTOF | Agilent 6550 QTOF |
Ion Mode | POSITIVE | NEGATIVE | POSITIVE | NEGATIVE |
Units | peak area | peak area | peak area | peak area |
Chromatography:
Chromatography ID: | CH004209 |
Instrument Name: | Agilent 1290 Infinity |
Column Name: | Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH HILIC (150 x 2.1mm,1.7um) |
Column Temperature: | 50 |
Flow Gradient: | 0 min, 100% B; 1 min, 100% B; 5 min, 90% B; 13.0 min, 0% B; 16 min, 0% B; 16.5 min, 100% B; and 20 min, 100% B |
Flow Rate: | 400 uL/min |
Solvent A: | Water with 1% acetonitrile, 5mM ammonium acetate & 0.1% formic acid |
Solvent B: | Water with 95% acetonitrile, 5mM ammonium acetate & 0.1% formic acid |
Chromatography Type: | HILIC |
Chromatography ID: | CH004210 |
Instrument Name: | Agilent 1290 |
Column Name: | Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 (150 x 2.1mm, 1.8um) |
Column Temperature: | 50 |
Flow Gradient: | 0 min, 0% B; 1 min, 0% B; 3 min, 5% B; 13.0 min, 100% B; 16 min, 100% B; 16.5 min, 0% B; and 20 min, 0% B |
Flow Rate: | 400 uL/min |
Solvent A: | Water with 1% acetonitrile, 5mM ammonium acetate & 0.1% formic acid |
Solvent B: | Water with 95% acetonitrile, 5mM ammonium acetate & 0.1% formic acid |
Chromatography Type: | Reversed phase |
MS:
MS ID: | MS005260 |
Analysis ID: | AN005535 |
Instrument Name: | Agilent 6550 QTOF |
Instrument Type: | QTOF |
MS Type: | ESI |
MS Comments: | For each column, the run time is 20 min using a flow rate of 400 μL/min. A total of four samples per run was performed to give maximum coverage of metabolites. Samples were injected in duplicate or triplicate, and a quality control sample, made up of a subset of samples from the study was injected several times during a run. All raw data files obtained were converted to compound exchange file format using Masshunter DA reprocessor software (Agilent, USA). Mass Profile Professional (Agilent, USA) was used for data alignment and to convert each metabolite feature (m/z x intensity x time) into a matrix of detected peaks for compound identification. Components that were matched were further examined by comparison to a purchased reference standard of the proposed compound. Mass accuracy of the Q-TOF method was <5ppm with retention time precision better than 0.2%. A 1.2x fold change can be detected with a precision of 4%. |
Ion Mode: | POSITIVE |
MS ID: | MS005261 |
Analysis ID: | AN005536 |
Instrument Name: | Agilent 6550 QTOF |
Instrument Type: | QTOF |
MS Type: | ESI |
MS Comments: | For each column, the run time is 20 min using a flow rate of 400 μL/min. A total of four samples per run was performed to give maximum coverage of metabolites. Samples were injected in duplicate or triplicate, and a quality control sample, made up of a subset of samples from the study was injected several times during a run. All raw data files obtained were converted to compound exchange file format using Masshunter DA reprocessor software (Agilent, USA). Mass Profile Professional (Agilent, USA) was used for data alignment and to convert each metabolite feature (m/z x intensity x time) into a matrix of detected peaks for compound identification. Components that were matched were further examined by comparison to a purchased reference standard of the proposed compound. Mass accuracy of the Q-TOF method was <5ppm with retention time precision better than 0.2%. A 1.2x fold change can be detected with a precision of 4%. |
Ion Mode: | NEGATIVE |
MS ID: | MS005262 |
Analysis ID: | AN005537 |
Instrument Name: | Agilent 6550 QTOF |
Instrument Type: | QTOF |
MS Type: | ESI |
MS Comments: | For each column, the run time is 20 min using a flow rate of 400 μL/min. A total of four samples per run was performed to give maximum coverage of metabolites. Samples were injected in duplicate or triplicate, and a quality control sample, made up of a subset of samples from the study was injected several times during a run. All raw data files obtained were converted to compound exchange file format using Masshunter DA reprocessor software (Agilent, USA). Mass Profile Professional (Agilent, USA) was used for data alignment and to convert each metabolite feature (m/z x intensity x time) into a matrix of detected peaks for compound identification. Components that were matched were further examined by comparison to a purchased reference standard of the proposed compound. Mass accuracy of the Q-TOF method was <5ppm with retention time precision better than 0.2%. A 1.2x fold change can be detected with a precision of 4%. |
Ion Mode: | POSITIVE |
MS ID: | MS005263 |
Analysis ID: | AN005538 |
Instrument Name: | Agilent 6550 QTOF |
Instrument Type: | QTOF |
MS Type: | ESI |
MS Comments: | For each column, the run time is 20 min using a flow rate of 400 μL/min. A total of four samples per run was performed to give maximum coverage of metabolites. Samples were injected in duplicate or triplicate, and a quality control sample, made up of a subset of samples from the study was injected several times during a run. All raw data files obtained were converted to compound exchange file format using Masshunter DA reprocessor software (Agilent, USA). Mass Profile Professional (Agilent, USA) was used for data alignment and to convert each metabolite feature (m/z x intensity x time) into a matrix of detected peaks for compound identification. Components that were matched were further examined by comparison to a purchased reference standard of the proposed compound. Mass accuracy of the Q-TOF method was <5ppm with retention time precision better than 0.2%. A 1.2x fold change can be detected with a precision of 4%. |
Ion Mode: | NEGATIVE |