Summary of Study ST000963
This data is available at the NIH Common Fund's National Metabolomics Data Repository (NMDR) website, the Metabolomics Workbench, https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org, where it has been assigned Project ID PR000661. The data can be accessed directly via it's Project DOI: 10.21228/M87D53 This work is supported by NIH grant, U2C- DK119886.
See: https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/about/howtocite.php
Study ID | ST000963 |
Study Title | Lipidomics of inflammation-induced optic nerve regeneration |
Study Type | untargeted LC-MS/MS profiling |
Study Summary | In adult mammals, retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) fail to regenerate their axons when damaged. As a result, RGCs die after acute injury and in progressive degenerative diseases such as glaucoma; such damage can lead to permanent vision loss and blindness. Little is known about the roles of lipids in axon injury and repair despite their fundamental importance in composition of cell membranes, myelin sheaths and mediation of signaling pathways. Study of the lipidome in the biology of optic nerve (ON) regeneration has been largely neglected. A better understanding of the roles that lipids play in RGC biology may enhance understanding of RGC-related diseases and point to novel treatments. Established experimental models of ON regeneration allow exploration of molecular determinants of RGC axon regenerative success and failure. In this study, we used high-resolution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to analyze lipidomic profiles of the ON and retina in an ON crush model with and without intravitreal Zymosan injections to enhance regeneration. Our results reveal profound remodeling of retina and ON lipidomes that occur after injury. In the retina, Zymosan treatment largely abrogates widespread lipidome alterations. In the ON, Zymosan induces lipid profiles that are distinct from those observed in naïve and vehicle-injected crush controls. We have identified a number of lipid species, classes and fatty acids that may be involved in the mechanisms of axon damage and repair. Lipids upregulated during RGC regeneration may be interesting candidates for further functional studies. |
Institute | University of Miami |
Department | Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute |
Laboratory | Sanjoy K. Bhattacharya Lab |
Last Name | Bhattacharya |
First Name | Sanjoy |
Address | 900 NW 17th St, Miami, FL 33136, USA |
sbhattacharya@med.miami.edu | |
Phone | 3054824103 |
Submit Date | 2018-04-17 |
Num Groups | 9 |
Total Subjects | 28 |
Num Males | 28 |
Raw Data Available | Yes |
Raw Data File Type(s) | raw(Thermo) |
Analysis Type Detail | LC-MS |
Release Date | 2018-09-27 |
Release Version | 1 |
Select appropriate tab below to view additional metadata details:
Combined analysis:
Analysis ID | AN001577 |
---|---|
Analysis type | MS |
Chromatography type | Reversed phase |
Chromatography system | Thermo Accela 600 |
Column | Thermo Acclaim C30 (150 x 2.1mm,3um) |
MS Type | ESI |
MS instrument type | Orbitrap |
MS instrument name | Thermo Q Exactive Orbitrap |
Ion Mode | UNSPECIFIED |
Units | peak area |
Chromatography:
Chromatography ID: | CH001106 |
Chromatography Summary: | Reversed phase chromatographic separation was achieved using Accela Autosampler, Accela 600 pump and Acclaim C30 column: 3 µm, 2.1x150 mm (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). The column temperature was maintained at 30 ºC (negative mode) or 45ºC (positive mode) and tray temperature at 20ºC. Solvent A was composed of 10 mM ammonium acetate (LC-MS grade) in 60:40 methanol:water (LC-MS grade) with 0.2% formic acid (LC-MS grade). Solvent B was composed of 10 mM ammonium acetate with 60:40 methanol:chloroform with 0.2% formic acid. The flow rate was 260 µL/min and injection volume was 5 µL. The gradient was 35-100% solvent B over 13.0 min, 100% solvent B over 13.0-13.8 min, 100-35% solvent B over 13.8-14.5 min, 35% solvent B over 14.5-18.0 min, 0% solvent B over 18.0-20.0 min. |
Instrument Name: | Thermo Accela 600 |
Column Name: | Thermo Acclaim C30 (150 x 2.1mm,3um) |
Column Temperature: | 30 (negative mode)/45 (positive mode) |
Flow Gradient: | The gradient was 35-100% solvent B over 13.0 min, 100% solvent B over 13.0-13.8 min, 100-35% solvent B over 13.8-14.5 min, 35% solvent B over 14.5-18.0 min, 0% solvent B over 18.0-20.0 min. |
Flow Rate: | 260 µL/min |
Sample Injection: | 5 µL |
Solvent A: | 60% methanol/40% water; 0.2% formic acid; 10 mM ammonium acetate |
Solvent B: | 60% methanol/40% chloroform; 0.2% formic acid; 10 mM ammonium acetate |
Analytical Time: | 20 min |
Oven Temperature: | 20ºC |
Chromatography Type: | Reversed phase |