Summary of Study ST000442

This data is available at the NIH Common Fund's National Metabolomics Data Repository (NMDR) website, the Metabolomics Workbench, https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org, where it has been assigned Project ID PR000341. The data can be accessed directly via it's Project DOI: 10.21228/M8989V This work is supported by NIH grant, U2C- DK119886.

See: https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/about/howtocite.php

Perform statistical analysis  |  Show all samples  |  Download binned data  
Download mwTab file (text)   |  Download mwTab file(JSON)   |  Download data files (Contains raw data)
Study IDST000442
Study TitleMetabolomics Analysis of Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCa) Cell Lines
Study TypeMetabolomics comparison of different breast cancer cell lines
Study SummaryWe used untargeted metabolomic profiling to distinguish this form of BCa from estrogen receptor positive (ER+) subtypes (+/- HER2/neu) and determine that may explain why a commonly used chemotherapeutic, paclitaxel, is generally ineffective at eliciting long-term cytotoxic and/or cytostatic responses in cell line models of TNBC. This metabolomics study used broad spectrum 1H NMR to compare Luminal A (BT474, MCF-7) and triple-negative (MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468) BCa cell lines, to determine differences in the two subtypes as well as distinguish therapeutic treatment responses for identifying new targets for drug discovery.
Institute
University of North Carolina
DepartmentDiscovery Sciences
LaboratorySumner Lab
Last NameSumner
First NameSusan
AddressEastern Regional Comprehensive Metabolomics Resource Core, UNC Nutrition Research Institute, 500 Laureate Way, Kannapolis, NC, 28081
Emailsusan_sumner @unc.edu
Phone704-250-5066
Submit Date2016-08-02
Num Groups4
Total Subjects24
Study Comments4 breast cancer cell lines, treated with paclitaxel compared to controls (3 replicates/line/condition)
PublicationsJ. Proteome Res., Article ASAP, DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00430
Raw Data AvailableYes
Raw Data File Type(s)1r
Analysis Type DetailNMR
Release Date2016-12-22
Release Version1
Susan Sumner Susan Sumner
https://dx.doi.org/10.21228/M8989V
ftp://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/Studies/ application/zip

Select appropriate tab below to view additional metadata details:


Sample Preparation:

Sampleprep ID:SP000470
Sampleprep Summary:Added 1 mL of an ice-cold chloroform to the tubes and 10 ceramic beads. Tubes were vortexed for 30 seconds on a multi-tube vortexer at 5000 rpm three times to homogenize and centrifuged samples at 4 °C in a swinging bucket centrifuge for 60 min at 3,700 rpm. Majority of aqueous (top) layer was carefully transferred to 5 mL cryotubes. Majority of lipid (bottom) layer was carefully transferred to 7 mL glass vials. Remaining protein layer and residual aqueous & lipid layers were transferred into a 2 mL Lo-Bind tubes. Original tubes were rinsed with 600 µL of 2:1 chloroform:methanol solution and transferred to the 2 mL tubes. Centrifuged tubes at 15,000 rpm at 4 °C for 20 min and transferred remaining aqueous & lipid fractions into respective tubes. For each study sample, an 800 µL aliquot of the aqueous fractions was transferred to labeled 2.0 mL Lo-Bind tubes. Analytical pooled QC samples were generated by transferring an additional 75 µL aliquot from all study samples into a 10 mL tube. The total pooled sample was vortexed and 800 µL aliquots were transferred to 2.0 mL tubes labeled Pool. All tubes were frozen for 1 hr and lyophilized to dryness overnight. Samples were reconstituted by adding 700 µL of 90:10 D2O:Chenomx ISTD master mix to each, vortexed for 2 mins and centrifuged at 16,000 rcf for 4 min. A 600 µL aliquot of the supernatant was transferred into 5 mm NMR tubes (Bruker-Biospin, Switzerland), and kept on ice until data acquisition.
Processing Method:lyophilization
Extraction Method:Acetonitrile:water and chloroform
Sample Resuspension:NMR master mix
Cell Type:breast cancer
  logo